T-Bone Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 Black Sea Ops will be updated to run with the current patch when it is released. At this moment it is 1.11, but it will be 1.12 compatable and 1.2 hopefully. T-Bone [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus G72GX | CPU: Core 2 Duo Overclocked @ 2.9Ghz | Memory 6GB DDR2 | Graphics Card: nVidia GTX 260m 1GB | OS: Windows 7 Home Premium | Monitor: Samsung 32" LCD LOMAC 1.0 to FC 1.12 System RIP (2003-2010) | AMD Athlon 64 3000+ overclocked to 2565MHz | NVidia Geforce 7800 GS AGP 256 MB | 1GB Kingston PC2700 DDR DRAM | Windows 2000 with SP4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necroscope Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 ....nope:F-15 exterior, SU-33 maneuvers!!!:rolleyes::o No! :) Su-27 - Much more beautiful then F-15! :)))))) May be F-15 have more powerfull computer, but on exterior and maneuvers - Su - Best. :) Всех убью, один останусь! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Bone Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 I still say F-16C is the best looking plane. If the F-16 was a woman, I'd marry her. T-Bone [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus G72GX | CPU: Core 2 Duo Overclocked @ 2.9Ghz | Memory 6GB DDR2 | Graphics Card: nVidia GTX 260m 1GB | OS: Windows 7 Home Premium | Monitor: Samsung 32" LCD LOMAC 1.0 to FC 1.12 System RIP (2003-2010) | AMD Athlon 64 3000+ overclocked to 2565MHz | NVidia Geforce 7800 GS AGP 256 MB | 1GB Kingston PC2700 DDR DRAM | Windows 2000 with SP4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necroscope Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 I like this foto of F-15, ^_) P.S. PLS, don`t kick me! ^) http://www.micom.net/oops/HangarCrash.jpg Всех убью, один останусь! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necroscope Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 f-15 - Boy http://www.micom.net/oops/It's%20a%20boy.jpg Всех убью, один останусь! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dronas Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 DimAss Coljo Yappo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EVIL-SCOTSMAN Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 how the F**K did the cop car get under there ? I know the story of the hangar one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necroscope Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 I know the story of the hangar one. Tell me, PLS. ^) Всех убью, один останусь! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EVIL-SCOTSMAN Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 it was an engine test, and the dude forgot to break or the things holding the aircraft in place snapped, thus allowing the aircraft to move forward. it was awhile ago that i got told the full story, but i think somethings broke and the aircraft went forward at full afterburner and straight into the hangar door. but basically it was a test that went wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anivanov Posted December 3, 2005 Author Share Posted December 3, 2005 everything go wrong, sooner or later...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anivanov Posted December 6, 2005 Author Share Posted December 6, 2005 f-15 is going to retirement, f-22 is here..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maverick-90 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 it's F/A-22.....not F-22 well i don't like it...Ok for sure it's Stealthy and has Thrust vectoring, but the C/C (Cost to Capability) Rate is far too low i think. It's Air to Air only, with the A/G-Role limited to 4 Bombs that can be carried.....not really worth the Price, a (nearly) A/A only fighter is way to un-economically in today's world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaGURUinzaSKY Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 it's F/A-22.....not F-22 well i don't like it...Ok for sure it's Stealthy and has Thrust vectoring, but the C/C (Cost to Capability) Rate is far too low i think. It's Air to Air only, with the A/G-Role limited to 4 Bombs that can be carried.....not really worth the Price, a (nearly) A/A only fighter is way to un-economically in today's world. and why americans buy it then? Robbie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maverick-90 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Because they have the money, and the USA don't have that much people who are against the big Military Funding they got over there... the USA has many things that are un-economically (B-2, 15 Carriers, Big Reserve Fleet) but they have the money to afford it, unlike most other Countries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mobius1 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 it's F/A-22.....not F-22 well i don't like it...Ok for sure it's Stealthy and has Thrust vectoring, but the C/C (Cost to Capability) Rate is far too low i think. It's Air to Air only, with the A/G-Role limited to 4 Bombs that can be carried.....not really worth the Price, a (nearly) A/A only fighter is way to un-economically in today's world. Like you said, it's the F/A-22, meaning it has ground attack capabilities. It can carry varius smart munitions and even if it carried only 4-bombs, that would be just as many if not more than some other strike aircraft, but with more capabilities. The F/A-22 can take the place of the F-15C, F-15E, F-16, F/A-18, and other aircraft, so really, imagine the cost of the aircraft it takes the place of added together and it really isn't that un-economical (not saying that it doesn't cost a helluva lot of money ;)). Stupid thermals... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaGURUinzaSKY Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Because they have the money, and the USA don't have that much people who are against the big Military Funding they got over there... the USA has many things that are un-economically (B-2, 15 Carriers, Big Reserve Fleet) but they have the money to afford it, unlike most other Countries. Well if they got money and no people against, I see no problems.. it's a good aircraft and they will spend more money for A/G aicraft if they need it.. no? Robbie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maverick-90 Posted December 7, 2005 Share Posted December 7, 2005 Well in my oppinion, today it's the best way to buy a real Multirole, a very big Airforce gets unhandy, like the Red Army was back in the '80s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaGURUinzaSKY Posted December 7, 2005 Share Posted December 7, 2005 can anybody explain why a long time ago was just F-number and now F/A- number.. ? Thanx Robbie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maverick-90 Posted December 7, 2005 Share Posted December 7, 2005 Well because it was equipped with Bombing abilities, i can hold 4 jdams internally AFAIK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anivanov Posted December 7, 2005 Author Share Posted December 7, 2005 mav-90, yeah it is F/A-22, i just forget to add A.I dont like this plane. it is modern airplane(multirole), but sooner or later American Airforces will see it"s not a bingo A/G plane.I think there is no need to mix up AIR and GROUNDATACKER caracteristics.for example:if you mix up this caracteristics F/A looses on fighter feature, and its the same thing for the aircraft which primary purpose is to attack ground targets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maverick-90 Posted December 7, 2005 Share Posted December 7, 2005 The F/A-22 can take the place of the F-15C, F-15E, F-16, F/A-18, Oops must have missed your post.. Well if you manage an arrested landing in a F/A-22 you're a real Pro! Well it's my oppinion, you don'T have to share it, i don'T like it, cuz it'S not enough plane for the money it costs ;-) Well i'm german, so may the US throw their money where they want :icon_jook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anivanov Posted December 7, 2005 Author Share Posted December 7, 2005 Original posted by Maverick-90 Well i'm german, so may the US throw their money where they want :icon_jook not US, US goverment and their president.........he is spending money just because he can tell to the nation he bought something really goood........:cool::cool::cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mobius1 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Oops must have missed your post.. Well if you manage an arrested landing in a F/A-22 you're a real Pro! Of course I can, just give me a second....:icon_jook I was saying capability-wise it had a similar role. The carrier version of the F-35 could take the place of the F/A-18, but I doubt it since the F/A-18E/F's are still very new and very capable.;) Stupid thermals... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maverick-90 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 understood ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anivanov Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Of course I can, just give me a second....:icon_jook I was saying capability-wise it had a similar role. The carrier version of the F-35 could take the place of the F/A-18, but I doubt it since the F/A-18E/F's are still very new and very capable.;) F/A-18E/F are still young ( they are short time in U.S. Airforces ) and they will play an important role for many years..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts