Jump to content

Poll: Who still uses LOMAN 2.1?  

29 members have voted

  1. 1. Poll: Who still uses LOMAN 2.1?

    • Yes, I still use LOMAN 2.1
      8
    • No, I don't use LOMAN 2.1
      21


Recommended Posts

Posted

I need to know because I'm thinking of releasing a patch for it that makes it compatible with FC V1.11/12. It would also be a relatively easy way to install Mizzy's stutter reducing/FPS gaining textures (for the people working on it) into the CDDS files relatively painlessly, if it gets released. Still need permission from ED.

 

Also, does anyone know if ModMAN can install directly into the CDDS files? If possible, I would like to make a ModMAN compatible pack as well.

 

EDIT: Turned this into a Poll. Previous thread deleted.

sigzk5.jpg
Posted
I use Modman/Loman 5.

 

Also yes Modman can install directly into the CDDS files.

More than one file at a time?

i7-2600k@4GHz, 8GB, R9 280X 3GB, SSD, HOTAS WH, Pro Flight Combat Pedals, TIR5

Guest ThomasDWeiss
Posted

LOMAN 5 is being downloaded 10 times as much as LOMAN 2.1 at Lockonfiles, but you can make a 2.1 pack because 5 will install it, whereas 2.1 can't install a 5 pack.

Posted
LOMAN 5 is being downloaded 10 times as much as LOMAN 2.1 at Lockonfiles, but you can make a 2.1 pack because 5 will install it, whereas 2.1 can't install a 5 pack.

 

So I can make a LOMAN 2.1 pack that MODMAN can install?

 

Moreover, is MODMAN updated since FC V1.11? The patch came with an extra CDDS file, and by basing my work on TekaTeka's, I've been able to make an update to LOMAN 2.1 so that it installs into the new CDDS file. Has the same been with MODMAN?

sigzk5.jpg
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...