-
Posts
856 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by GumidekCZ
-
-
I can confirm, that model arguments for "BORT NUMBERS"! now (thanks to BUG) controls the model of pilots. BORT number is now showing.
-
1
-
-
True CZECH liveries with correct camouflage lines, color shades and stencils, NOT like we have as default in DCS right now (skin competition winner)
Tiger scarf: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3323159/
Tiger ripping through: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3318237/
Without Tiger: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3318869/( Wish I have an Nvidia card right now, because the Radeon MSAA 4x edges look like a chain saw
)
-
7
-
-
On 3/23/2025 at 7:29 AM, Special K said:
Do you use MSI afterburner?
The menu isn't multithreaded, it never was. So you are always on one core. Do you have anything in your Saved Games\DCS\Scripts\exports.lua?
Thanks for reply.
My problem was some Lua code loop running on that single core just after reaching DCS menu, which result in quick freezing entire PC.
I solved it by deleting Saved Games / DCS folder - now I still dont know which Lua script there was the initiator of that loop - if time will allow, I will try to find that. -
Same here, one core reaching 100% in DCS menu and in mission also. This makes DCS freezing in less then 60 seconds - unplayable!
-
1
-
-
-
17 hours ago, Flappie said:
Thanks, @UnderTaker2003. Antialising looks "OK" to me. It has its limits as stated previously by user @Czar66.
I tried to reproduce the black smudge issue with my NVIDIA GPU (you never know) but I couldn't. I'll now ask my fellow testers with AMD GPUs to try and replicate the issue.
I think this may be really the problem of AMD GPUs. We need to compare exact screens AMD vs Nvidia with same graphic setting, where sharp 3d model edges or map watter edge are almost (not exactly) horizontal.
-
1
-
-
Ground SAM units IR seekers are still unable to detect pre-emptive FLARES
-
-
great idea to improve KB handling.
-
1
-
-
THIS IS SPARTA!!!! oh sorry no, THIS IS UGLY!!!!
I also did a clean AMD driver instalation to be sure.
@BIGNEWY open the picture and look at the edges. ED needs to improve this. This is really a killer of DCS graphics.
Display resolution doesnt matter as I check my old screenshots.
-
1
-
-
-
-
@NineLine Please, can the ED team finally fix the DIMM export after such a long time since the problem was reported?
Many thanks.-
1
-
-
-
-
Same issue still present - thats horrible! It ruins the game immersion!
-
2
-
-
On 11/13/2024 at 10:39 PM, DimSim said:
Just for clarity, I see the name 'User Snap View Saving'.
I find saving the default view works with most, but not all aircraft, namely the A-10C II does not seem to save the default.
Thanks, I was not at my PC to check correct naming. Will fix it.
-
I solved the problem with this:
-
1
-
-
So I had to find solution by my self (I have been foolish)
And I found it.
I didnt know, that "User Snap View Saving" in MISC DCS settings have effect on this problem - because it is wrongly named. It have not effect just on quick view, but also on user saved default view.So if anybody in troubles with default view angle not set after DCS restarted ... make sure that this option is checked
-
3
-
-
The WORNG descent profile reported long time ago (April 27 2024):
https://forum.dcs.world/topic/347820-ai-descent-angle-wrong-calculated/#comment-5422844 -
WP now in feets after previous update - NICE! GJ!
But INS still set to NAV instead of IFA -
33 minutes ago, NineLine said:
Make sure you pass your findings along to campaign creators, this most likely needs to be tuned in the Mission Editor and less about the AI. Remember the AI is not 100% the same as player aircraft so they cannot adjust as easily. A reason the GFM is needed).Thanks.
At the time we released Gamblers and started to fixing old Raven One, AI behaved reasonable, able to rejoin in turn and climbed without problems. Now its just ...beeeeep....
Other developers knows about it, players reported annyoing stupid behaviour months ago.Do the developers need to adjust AI lead climb profile in every new/old mission? Really? Thats what you want from them/us? instead of further tuning AI logic and may be adding some options for AI into ME?
-
On 10/31/2024 at 11:22 PM, NineLine said:
I am not sure I am seeing the issue here other than you are trying to force the AI to do something and limiting their ability to do that. I can maybe see limiting their speed or afterburner use at cruise speeds but why on climb? Also, I do not see this S maneuver in your track unless you mean when they hit the end of your assigned path which would just mean they have run out of commands and don't know how to proceed.
When I tried restricting Afterburner I allowed 375ks, and it climbed fairly smoothly and reached altitude just about a minute later than the unit with afterburner allowed. You set the speed of the restricted after-burner unit to 330, and I can see in tacview that it did struggle to maintain speed and climb more. Even losing a little altitude near the end.
Do you know how many of paid missions I had to tune or put there AFB restriction for AI as Lead in climb? MANY! I hate this! But Im glad I can help to campaign developers and bring players smoother flight experience.
IRL pilots always need to plan the flight and choose between quick AFB climb and saving fuel after reaching cruise alt, OR to do shallow climb without using of AFB - more fuel saving when heavy loaded and better to wingmen form-up in climb, not after reaching cruise alt as in first example.
So as most of DCS campaign missions - where AI is a lead, I (and many others) would like to se smooth AI flight with whatever I setup in ME (except the near stall speeds). I cant immagine, how mix of AFB with speedbrake climb can be NOT-BUG in your eyes.
One good thing ED had done - get rid of the side wave glitch when AI crossing WP as mentioned in recent change log. GOOD JOB TEAM! -
F-16C
152nd_Fighter_Squadron
80th_Fighter_Squadron
36th_Fighter_Squadron
174th_Fighter_Squadron
132nd_Wing _Iowa_ANGM-2000C:
2004 Tigermeet
2010 TigermeetThis results in jittery lines in F2 view:
-
1
-
Rocket Pod Fairings
in Wish List
Posted · Edited by GumidekCZ
Same video, another Hornet, smaller Rocket pod:
And finally, HERE IS THE MOMENT OF FAIRING BEEN PIERCED BY ROCKET!