Ithronwise
-
Posts
205 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Ithronwise
-
-
The last thread where you asked for changing the flight model (which is property of ED as I already wrote in that thread) was deleted because trying to get information about how to get access to the flight model was a violation of licence rights. If ED don't want anyone but themselves to change their flight models, then you can't go over it.
The flight models of all official modules (and also of the standalone community mods) are the result of years of hard work, research and testing. All these things cost a lot of money and (in case of ED and the 3rd party developers) the only way to get this money back (to pay their employees for example) is to sell modules based on these flight models. If they would give information about their flight models to everyone who asks for it, they would give away the basis of their business and would be bankrupt very soon. -
58 minutes ago, truebrit said:
Does this mod do anything above what the F/A-18c does, or is it just a new exterior model?
Advantage: with fuel tanks you can carry more loadout.
A/G:
Legacy Hornet: 2x AIM-9M/X, 4x GBU-12/GBU-38, 3x Fuel tanks, 1x ATFLIR, 1x AIM-120B/C
Super Hornet: 2x AIM-9M/X, 6x GBU-12/GBU-38, 3x Fuel tanks, 1x ATFLIRA/A:
Legacy Hornet: 2x AIM-9M/X, 6x AIM-120B/C, 3x Fuel tanks
Super Hornet: 2x AIM-9M/X, 7x AIM-120B/C, 3x Fuel tanks
Disadvantage: the inner wing pylons of the Super Hornet can carry a lot of weapons but cannot drop/fire them, so, this stations should only be used for fuel tanks, and the right fuselage station isn't functional (therefore the uneven number of AMRAAMs in the example above)
-
2
-
-
On 3/17/2023 at 10:04 PM, HR-Crumble said:
s there a way I can use this mod but only have legacy hornet pylons A. Shown on the model and B. Fully working as per the legacy and not with a non functional cheek or the pylons shifted to one side?
The mode comes with two command line scripts that allows you to switch from the Super Hornet pylon config to the Legacy Hornet pylon config and back (means both fuselage stations are fully functional, both outer wing pylons are not useable but still visible).
-
7 hours ago, KrackaJac said:
Well this just show how deceptive you all are! The above link will take you straight to the dowload Links
And that shows that you haven't understood how it works. You don't have to pay for the mod if you don't want to. Just put a 0 in the line for the price and you get it for free. Other users who like the mod and know exactly how much hard work it is to make a mod of this quality have no problem giving the developers some money. What's deceptive about that?
The only deceptive attitude comes from you with your expectation that other people's hard work must always be free for you.
-
3
-
-
Meine Werkzeuge der Wahl sind GIMP für die Layer und Inscape zum Erstellen der Zeichen, Logos, Abzeichen u.ä.. Ich speichere die dds-Dateien allerdings im BC3 (DXT5) Format ab, spart Speicherplatz (bei 2048 x 2048 = 4,00 MB Größe statt 5,33 MB) und qualitativ konnte ich keine Unterschiede feststellen.
-
47 minutes ago, captflyby said:
I have installed the super hornet mod. The spash sceen at start up shows a super hornet as the theme. Inside cockpit and outside aircraft remain fa-18c. What am I missing? Help is appreciated. Thank you.
Did you have created a mission with one of the Super Hornet versions (F/A-18E, F/A-18F or EA-18G)?
The Super Hornet mod doesn't replace the Legacy Hornet anymore. So if you load an F/A-18C mission you will get the F/A-18C. If you want the Super Hornet you have to change the aircraft in this mission from F/A-18C to F/A-18E/F or EA-18G in the Mission Editor.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, muzica9 said:
this means all unofficial aircraft mods are affected
Not all, only those based on FC3. Standalone mods like A-4E-C, UH-60L, OV-10A, T-45C and VSN F-4B seems not to be affected. And mods based on full fidelity modules like the CJS Super Hornet or the IDF Mods Project F-16I SUFA are working, too.
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, LtSpoon said:
1. Der Preis der Nitro+ SE war mal kurz bei utopischen 1.400 - 1.500 Euro. Siehe Geizhals Chart
Waren Sie auch. Was ist an der Aussage falsch? Du weißt schon, freie Marktwirtschaft und so, Angebot und Nachfrage? Dass die Preise wieder gesunken sind, ändert doch nichts an der Tatsache, dass sie zum Zeitpunkt des Angebots entsprechend hoch waren und demnach das Angebot im Verhältnis durchaus günstig anzusehen war, wenn jemand unbedingt genau diese Grafikkarte zu dem Zeitpunkt hätte haben wollen. Oder geht es Dir nur darum unbedingt Recht behalten zu wollen? Dann tu ich Dir den Gefallen: Du hattest Recht, die Grafikkarte ist nun (wohlgemerkt 2 Wochen später) neu tatsächlich günstiger als das Gebrauchtangebot seinerzeit im Handelsthread. Bin mir nur nicht sicher, was genau das beweisen soll. Aber vielleicht hilft es ja zumindest diese totgerittene Diskussion zu beenden.
-
1
-
-
I also can confirm that. No crashes anymore in ST and MT (I tested both with the missions in this thread), still on Adrenalin 22.11.2
-
1 hour ago, HoBGoBLiNzx3 said:
If we are updating from the previous version we only need to download the new mod and srs fix correct? There are no changes to the skin pack or tanker?
Correct
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, Linbei said:
The station at the right side of the fuselage of the F/A-18E/F is unavailable yet. Is it because the Superbug mod uses the legacy configuration, and its total available numbers of the stations is limited to 10?
Exactly
-
1
-
-
12 hours ago, TheGhostOfDefi said:
In your base version the Mission goes fine but i edited it to include an unhealthy amount of WAYPOINTS which then crashed the game when the Mission is being loaded.
I can confirm that. And in this mission the VRAM workload was only 11064 MB, GPU workload was 20%, CPU workload was 9% and RAM workload was 23.1 GB when it crashed.
-
I have tried to provoke this issue by building a mission with a large number of all kind of units (2187 in all) but I had no luck (see screenshot). The ME becomes a little laggy but no flickering, no crash. I have the mission attached (Attention, it is a nonsense mission just for testing, so don't try to play it, just load it in the ME). The file size is surprisingly small compared to the both problematic missions posted earlier in this thread. But this cannot be the reason because I have a very complex mission with a lot of trigger actions in it that is twice as large as these both.
So, I have no glue. Maybe it is a special unit that I haven't used in my missions yet or it is a combination between an unit and some waypoint or trigger actions, I don't know. Could someone of the affected users test the attached mission in the ME? Normally it shouldn't cause any problems.
-
44 minutes ago, TheGhostOfDefi said:
Negative! 6800XT and VRAM is not Full. Only Clockrate goes All in. (Tested on other mission than here in this Thread)
How many units do you have in your mission? I have a lot of missions with 400 to 700 units (static and non-static) and never had this issue. Only with the two missions from this thread I saw this issue for the very first time and on both missions the VRAM was full (16384 MB) in the Mission Editor.
-
56 minutes ago, Flappie said:
Here's two:
Thank you @Flappie. I can confirm this issue in both missions (Operation Clear Field Escalation and Operation Scarlet Down). The icons in the ME start flickering and then DCS crashes to the desktop without an error message. I have never seen this in my missions, but I also didn't have that many units in them.
I think it could be a VRAM problem because in both missions the VRAM workload of my 6800XT is 100% in the ME.-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Citizen said:
This is not entirely accurate. While it is true that the lua file contains SFM data that the AI uses, there is also plenty of data in there that affects the player aircraft.
You can validate this claim by performing the following steps:
Test steps:
Attempt to fly over Burke destroyer with stock RCS value.
Result: quite dead
Attempt to fly over Burke destroyer with RCS set to zero.
Result: no engagement from DDG.Ok, thanks for the information. So, at least RCS (and maybe some other values) are also working in the realistic flight model. I played around a little with most of these values in the last weeks to help the developers to solve some annoying issues that only affected the AI-controlled Super Hornets and so I found, that the most values there are only effective for the AI.
10 minutes ago, Roger Hedrick said:Can I change this encrypted flight model value? Or is that not an option?
No, unfortunately (or understandably because ED has invested a lot of time and work in this flight model) not. It is encrypted. The only way would be to write an own flight model.
-
@313 SQN JD Could you share a typical mission file where you face this issue? That could help to find out, what is going wrong. As I wrote I don't have this issue but maybe I just don't use the same units, waypoint actions or trigger actions as you or the other affected users in my missions.
-
2 hours ago, Citizen said:
Scroll on down to the RCS = 3 line and change it to whatever your heart desires. Save. Repeat for the other two. Done!
Unfortunately, these values are only affecting the AI-controlled Super Hornets, because the lua files in the CoreMods folder are containing simplified flight model values for the AI. The values for the realistic flight model, used by the player-controlled Super Hornets are hardcoded and encrypted in the FA-18C.dll in Mods\FA-18C\bin and are the same as for the official F/A-18C module.
By the way, the RCS value for the Super Hornet variants in the luas of the CoreMods\FA-18C folder are already fitted, because the original value is 7.
-
I wonder why this doesn't happen to me. Is it the driver? Has someone of the affected users tried a rollback to 22.11.2?
-
Strange. I build complex missions in the ME, too but couldn't (fortunately) see this issue yet. I also have an AMD + AMD system (AMD Ryzen 3800X + ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT). I am still on Adrenalin 22.11.2. Maybe I don't use the "right" units or trigger actions? Has someone of the affected users an example mission to share?
-
56 minutes ago, LtSpoon said:
Ganz vergessen: Deinen Quatsch mit der deutschen Community ! Das ist eine tolle, vor allem sehr hilfsbereite Community ! Wenn Du mit 1-2 Problemen hast, schreib nicht gleich das alle so sind. Unglaublich was Du von Dir gibst. Was machst Du denn, wenn im engl. Teil mal welche etwas toxisch werden, neues Forum ?
Ich lese in der deutschen Community schon erheblich länger mit als ich schreibe (so ca. 4 Jahre). Und tendentiell reagieren hier erheblich mehr Nutzer angepisst auf Beiträge anderer oder werden gleich persönlich als in den kompletten englischsprachigen DCS-Foren. Und Deine Reaktion war das Paradebeispiel.
47 minutes ago, Kittie said:Jedes mal, wenn man sieht, das hier neue Beitrage kamen, habe ich die Hoffnung, das endlich wieder jemand was verkauft und ich mein wohl verdientes Schnäppchen machen kann. Das ich jedes mal enttäuscht werde, nervt langsam....
Tut mir leid, Kittie. Du hast recht. Es wäre gut, wenn ein Moderator die komplette Off-Topic-Diskussion inkl. der Preisdiskussion löschen würde.
-
4
-
-
1 hour ago, LtSpoon said:
Er argumentiert mit Mondpreisen von Restbeständen oder weil es ein XTXH Chip (SE) ist...Ich weis garnicht, warum er selbst nicht zuschlägt
Weitere Erklärungen oben in meinem Post.
Irgendwie habe ich genau so eine Reaktion erwartet. Danke, dass Du mich nicht enttäuscht hast.
Das ist das Tolle an der deutschen Community hier. Man wird gleich persönlich (daher bin ich lieber im englischsprachigen Raum unterwegs, da sind die Leute weniger verbiestert und pissig). Trotzdem diskutierst Du völlig an meiner Argumentation vorbei. Es ist vollkommen irrelevant, wieviel die Karte neu vor 2 Monaten gekostet hat. Relevant ist nur der Neupreis, der aktuell für so eine Karte verlangt wird. Sind diese Preise überteuert? Natürlich sind sie das. Im Vergleich dazu ist der hier offerierte Preis (Verhandlungsbasis wohlgemerkt) aber eben kein Mondpreis. Dass die 6900XT's anderer Hersteller billiger sind, zieht als Argument nicht. Du kannst auch niemandem, der einen Edeltoaster von DeLonghi gebraucht für 50 € anbietet, Monpreise vorwerfen, nur weil es Toaster anderer Hersteller neu bereits ab 20 € gibt. Und damit zu argumentieren, dass die 7900XT nur etwas teurer ist, ist ein Vergleich von Äpfeln mit Birnen.
Im übrigen, ich brauche die Karte nicht, bin mit meiner 6800XT vollkommen zufrieden. Es ging mir nur darum, dass Du dem Anbieter vorgeworfen hast, er würde einen Mondpreis verlangen und das ist angesichts der aktuellen Neupreise für die Karte nun einmal nicht der Fall. -
On 2/28/2023 at 7:50 AM, LtSpoon said:
Für mich ist das hier eine Community. Solche Preisvorstellungen kann man bei Ebay und Co vll. verlangen, da scheint es ja öfters mal "den Dummen" zum Kauf zu geben. Aber für mich gehört das hier nicht hin ! Das ist aber nur meine Meinung. Schön weiter solche Mondpreise aufrufen !
Auch auf die Gefahr hin, mich zu wiederholen, für eine Sapphire RX 6900 XT Nitro+ SE sind die 899 € gebraucht KEIN Mondpreis. Du kannst nicht einfach daher gehen und den Preis einer RX 6900 XT von irgendeinem beliebigen Hersteller als Vergleich nehmen. Google doch mal spaßeshalber nach einer neuen Sapphire RX 6900 XT Nitro+ SE, Du wirst staunen, was da noch für Neupreise auftauchen.
-
1
-
1
-
-
51 minutes ago, LtSpoon said:
O_o .....ähmm....ne 6900XT gibts neu ab 730 Euro !
Von anderen Herstellern vielleicht, aber eine Sapphire RX 6900XT Nitro+ SE (und die bietet autracer nun einmal an) kriegst Du derzeit nirgendwo neu für unter 1000 €.
CJS Super Hornet Community Mod v2.2 - Official Thread
in Flyable/Drivable Mods for DCS World
Posted · Edited by Ithronwise
The files are overwritten by modified versions that contain additional information/functions for the three Super Hornet variants. The information/functions for the Legacy Hornet remain untouched.
So, you can use Super Hornet and Legacy Hornet at the same time and also the slot for the Legacy Hornet in the Mission Editor isn't changed anymore, so Legacy Hornet missions are working as intended without modifications.