Mirage-4000

Yeah it’s the first RAF Typhoon combat kill but not first Typhoon combat kill. the first Typhoon combat kill was committed by RSAF Typhoon, actually they shot down dozens of them during the operations of Restoring Hope in Yemen.

Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with these things. However, I hope you can find a way out of this issue. What about shorter and smaller ballistic missiles, were you able to work with? Like the Iranian Fateh would be really interesting stuff.

I'm not sure whether this is the appropriate Topic to address my question. Do you intend to include more ballistic missiles? I mean, you're working on the S-300 and SAMP/T, which have the potential to compete with BMs. So, could we expect more ballistic missile assets other than the standard Scud-B?

According to my understanding, it will be added to the versions of other nations. It makes no sense to include PIRATE in the Germany version.

Do you recall where and when he stated that? because I'm wondering if I didn't listen very carefully when he said this.

This is an old photo for the Spain Eurofighter...

Okay, let's try to simplify things here... according to the slides, this photo is part of a set created by RAF, although I'm not sure. Why is there a Mark 82 bomb in that slide? I'm not sure why, but it may be a mistake. However, I believe the shot is for the Typhoon. and there are a few reasons for this. The typhoon centerline tank is encircled by the landing gear doors, creating a very tight area for the fuel tank (which is why the 1,500L tank was not fitted at the centerline station). Furthermore, look at the pylon; it's the same pylon, same signage, and similar typhoon markings in this photo.

What about this photo? you can notice the landing gear and the centerline fuel tank. it's a typhoon

The source is the Typhoon and Tempest special edition of AirForces Magazine.

Are you sure about that? yeah I know that the Kuwaiti Eurofighters will be the first Eurofighter to integrate Mark bombs, but the UK's Eurofighters carried 1,000Ib unguided bombs during operations in 2011.

I believe these types of questions are quite reasonable in the case of the Eurofighter Typhoon, as it is a multi-national fighter that is adding more capabilities over time, and its capabilities vary from one user to another within the same time frame. Furthermore, it is concerning that we are working on the German version as the baseline, which is much behind the UK's Eurofighter in terms of modernization. For example, in operations against ISIL, the UK's Eurofighter Typhoon employs stand-off weapons such as Storm Shadow and low-collatroal damage weapons such as Brimstone. We know that the Eurofighter Typhoon has evolved into a more focused fighter on A/A roles, but even in A/G role largely attributable to weapon stations in the Eurofighter It can carry out some A/G and anti-ship missions better than some fighters that were originally designed for A/G, such as the French Rafale, making it a very interesting platform whether in A/A or A/G roles. So I think the guys' decision not to commit to a specific variant, tranche, or time frame was a wise one.

As far as I know, the German Eurofighter Typhoon does not use the IRST/FLIR system known as " PIRATE ". Also, it's operating IRIS-T instead of ASRAAM. Moreover, if I recall correctly, the developer stated that they intend to focus on the German version while also working on other versions as liveries. So my question is whether we should expect the PIRATE sensor and the ASRAAM missile to be added during the EA stage or later, or whether we should not expect such systems/weapons to be added at all? because we expect full A/A capability in Early Access, and both PIRATE and ASRAAM are major systems in Typhoon's A/A Capability, if not in the German version it's primary weapon/system in the UK, Spain, and Italy, as well as an exported version for Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, and Qatar.

No developer, in my opinion, should be concerned about "Unbalancing" issues. When I buy a model, I expect the developer to have done it perfectly, or at the very least to have made an effort so that we can enjoy a realism experience. The server host is the person who should be concerned with balancing.