skoner

absolutely right Mohamengina i agree with your opinion 100% they deserved to get paid for this fantastic work

YES EPOKHA That is exactly what i want to say. Ambient sound. there is no wrong part~mate fox1 FOX2 FOX3 RIFLE MAGNUM violent breath in high G chatter /airport noise and etc. if ED invest not only grapfic but also sound part the dcs will be much much much better because sound is so important factor as visual effect

i agree DCS is excellent combat sim ,especially physical engine there is no better than DCS in my case but in sound field i feel something has to be improved .... of course most parts of the sound is good enough however i want to point out radio com sound effect yeah i agree they are still good but uh.. compared to other sim like MS FS-X/ falcon 4.0 AF i think there is room for improvement so i want to know what do you think about my opinion and i hope E.D consider that part thank!

thanks for your answer

sometimes in battle field aircraft take damage and goes through some system failure but if the aircraft can still go she has to land at AB and then just shut down the engines after a while ground crew fix the aircraft automatically. generally, after ground crew fixing service the aircraft is fine when the aircraft regain power but in the case of CDU failure there is some difference even if the aircraft's fixed by ground crew there is still system failure when i restart the engines i can't fix my ship in this case .... Haw.... i can't align EGI and CDu show some system failure how can i fix this problem ? thanks

COD 4 gun sounds video

look at this motherFuXXXXX http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14M85h8wbqM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-Jb9_sg34Y

jesus!! This is really worth to wait ~nice!

thank but i can't figure out any difference in each Fuze setting can you give me some mk-82 airburst profile setting ?

sorry but ah... can you explain what is function of fuze ? i haven't figured out yet thanks

if Next DCS.... if Next DCS is F/A-18 ... can we perform refueling TASK? :D what do you think?

oh sorry i misunderstanded Yo-Yo which means idiot i didn't know yo-yo is ED person sorry Sobek

i understand cultural difference but i just ask politely E.D will be able to make that sobek your word's offensive

is it hard to simulate prandtl glauert singularity?

F/A - 18 E SuperHornet!! hoorah~

yes i agree it's not bad just hope to be improved to improve sense of speed there is other source to use (EX-> sound effect , reaction to pilot etc whatever) just i guess other than passing object at high speed

by this time E.D's prducts get better and better but i think there is one more thing to be improved sense of speed generally, people playing air combat game want to feel extremely high speed .. like a movie of course i know the movie scene is exaggerated but when i'm flying over 100~200ft and over 300kn i feel very slow to combat jet 100ft is low altitude right? this is same opinion people playing E.D products have in my country on the other hand i feel much faster in DCS A-10 than in FC2.0 so i guess E.D also think about that concept finally we wish to feel much more faster speed in next generation DCS than previous one thanks:thumbup:

really? i don't know about that thaks pal

JTAC designates Target Mark by WP , Laser and IR point This method occurs randomly so far but i think this method is useless for example JTAC already gives myship target coordinate by SADAL so I absolutely locate target position nevertheless , if A-10c delivers laser guide bomb JTAC marks Target by laser and in night O.P mark by IR point uselessly and ramdomly let's try to look another case IN night OP the target is located in the middle of city so target wil be surrounded by brilliant light because of street light in this case player will be hard to distinguish brilliant street light from the verge of the IR point so it's difficult to find target in this case method of mark by laser is more efficient than IR point let's try to look another case if the target is situated in the middle of the dense forest player is too hard to fine target even if JTAC transmits target coordinate in this case if JTAC designates Target by laser play will be easy to find object so i wish to add JTAC command if player select method which JTAC designates target ( Request WP/ Request mark by laser/Request mark by IR point) i think player will use JTAC more efficient depending upon the situation and DCS A-10c will be more realistic just i guess thanks

Thanks!! thank to you!! i can solve this mysterious problem when i change the browser from explorer to chrome i could get Miz file

This is grate job~ but let me ask you something i can't get this mission in the form of MIZ file i acessed download link and download the file the file's form is ZIP file! not miz i decompressed this file then got Mission file but the mission file is not Miz or trk so i can't use this great mission how can i use this file . thanks

I believe F/A-18 super Hornet is best Choice ! and if E/D describe carrier realistically more than FS-X i'll be willing to pay the extra cost ... like FS-X add-on

Thanks for your help grimes

oh I'm sorry but it does not work,for me i'm still have same problem bahger mentioned would you mind sending refuling mission file to my email for me my email address is skoner@naver.com and i'll appreciate it if you'll send a file . Thanks