seavoyage

Can Dynamic Spawn 'Hide Not Flyable' and 'Dy. Spawn Template' restrictions be used to permit players without certain mods to load the .miz and circumvent the 'Mods Requirement'?

Interested in flying with you guys. Looks like you are planning on Afghanistan. Here's a .miz . All you need to do is swap to Red Devil livery. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3339627/

Were you able to resolve the issue? It sounds similar to my post on the SimShaker for Aviators DCS Channel: https://discord.com/channels/679923885595951128/910419903411015680/1261070667353428048 I have tried "Fix DCS Export' and done a DCS Repair. I found this related thread on the SimShaker for Aviators Discord Channel https://discord.com/channels/679923885595951128/921643357040672788/1078944348982497350 regarding SSA Port 29375 per SimShaker website FAQs https://simshaker-for-aviators.github.io/SimShaker-for-Aviators-Releases/faq.html I followed the instructions to install SSA for DCS. Output Mode: USB Forcefeel. Seat Handler 1.0.0.10 "ForceFeelState: OK." Test Vibe Motor Shaker: all motors works ... vibration si felt DCS F/A-18 recognized in DS Debug View. Logs show Export is being sent to DCS Scripts Export.lua . So the HF8 seat checks out but the DCS telemetry may not be received... I do not feel any vibrations in game DCS, and a SSA error message comes up. Ooops ... Something is wrong during calculation Exception: Index was outside the bounds of the array Stack.Trace: at SimShaker.Core.DataProvider.DCSDataProvider.CalculateWindsANDSpeed() at SimShaker.Core.DataProvider.DCSDataProvider.UseReceivedSimDataMethod(String receivedUDPMessage) What did I miss in configuration? Checking Port conflict https://discord.com/channels/679923885595951128/910419903411015680/1107021363186769980 mentioning Port 29375 may be assigned to DCS and SSA. Local IP 127.0.0.1 a netstat -ab UDP search: UDP DCS.exe on 7080, 63816 and 43001, (10308 for MP) SimShaker for Aviators,exe 29375 (DCS), 54930 (XPlane ?) and 62017. ibaJetSeatHandler,exe 29376 . No conflicting UDP Ports?

What is the command to display the Sensor Operator view and the Pilot Station?

Caution: Meta/Oculus may have disseminated another auto update today which came up when I started Oculus. My DCS Steam did not launch. Fix was to stop Oculus VR Runtime, roll back my Oculus diagnostic, client and runtime files, then restart Oculus VR Runtime.

SteamVRruns smoother and more stable than on ED on OculusVR, but SteamVR stutters when loading DCS.

Posted by Tribbin: URL to DookieShoes73 Reddit post:

Posted by Tribbin: URL to DookieShoes73 Reddit post:

Posted by Tribbin: Possible Hotfix posted by Mongoose on DCS Wingman Finder Discord: DCS 2.9.3.51704 (ED) now launches for me with VR enabled. I have turned off Oculus Autoupdate and set Oculus VR Runtime Service to Manual Start. URL to DookieShoes73 Reddit post: \

Meta confirmed can not roll back from autoinstalled v63 to v62. On SteamVR both DCS Standard and MT work fine. OpenXR is enabled. From Oculus: "For now it seems like the only solution is really to play via Steam by using the launch option force_oculus_VR. I'm not sure if DCS allows it, but maybe you could login to your Quest account inside the game via the Steam? If it does, that could be an option to play. Aside from that, I don't see much of an alternative until the fix rolls out from the developers. You can try to look for ways to roll back to V62 if you really have to, though I can't advise it as they are all unofficial methods, but some of them do mostly work." ED Support suggested renaming the DCS folder and the result: DCS v2.9.2.49940 Open Beta (non_steam) VR Enabled (Oculus v63) launched! ...but only once After DCS launches it creates a new DCS folder and I'm back to DCS not launching as DCS ignores the renamed folder. I have to manually delete the generated Saved Games\DCS folder to launch on OculusVR. A new options.lua is generated in ~\Saved Games\DCS\Config and you need to disable VR to relaunch DCS. I override the Saved Games path with DCS Updater Utility and Launch VR On or rename options.lua to options.lua.BAK . This hack occasionally launched DCS VR enabled in v2.9.2.49940 Open Beta and Oculus is v63, OpenXR Same finding when tested on v2.9.3.51740. Meanwhile - SteamVR is the backup. DCS Steam is v2.9.3.51740

Progress? ED Support suggested renaming the DCS folder and the result: DCS v2.9.2.49940 Open Beta (non_steam) VR Enabled (Oculus v63) launched! ...but only once After DCS launches it creates a new DCS folder and I'm back to DCS not launching as DCS ignores the renamed folder. I have to manually delete the generated Saved Games\DCS folder to launch on OculusVR. A new options.lua is generated in ~\Saved Games\DCS\Config and you need to disable VR to relaunch DCS. I override the Saved Games path with DCS Updater Utility and Launch VR On. This hack occasionally launched DCS VR enabled in v2.9.2.49940 Open Beta and Oculus is v63, OpenXR I am now testing on v2.9.3.51740. Meanwhile - SteamVR is the backup. DCS Steam is v2.9.3.51740

From Oculus: "For now it seems like the only solution is really to play via Steam by using the launch option force_oculus_VR. I'm not sure if DCS allows it, but maybe you could login to your Quest account inside the game via the Steam? If it does, that could be an option to play. Aside from that, I don't see much of an alternative until the fix rolls out from the developers. You can try to look for ways to roll back to V62 if you really have to, though I can't advise it as they are all unofficial methods, but some of them do mostly work." Progress? ED Support suggested renaming the DCS folder and the result: DCS v2.9.2.49940 Open Beta (non_steam) VR Enabled (Oculus v63) launched! ...but only once After DCS launches it creates a new DCS folder and I'm back to DCS not launching as DCS ignores the renamed folder. I have to manually delete the generated Saved Games\DCS folder to launch on OculusVR. A new options.lua is generated in ~\Saved Games\DCS\Config and you need to disable VR to relaunch DCS. I override the Saved Games path with DCS Updater Utility and Launch VR On or rename options.lua to options.lua.BAK . This hack occasionally launched DCS VR enabled in v2.9.2.49940 Open Beta and Oculus is v63, OpenXR Same finding when tested on v2.9.3.51740. Meanwhile - SteamVR is the backup. DCS Steam is v2.9.3.51740

I was only able to launch DCS if on SteamVR. Unfortunately can not migrate any of the purchased mods from ED E-shop (Only possible from Steam to ED standalone). Meta confirmed can not roll back from autoinstalled v63 to v62. On SteamVR both DCS Standard and MT work fine. OpenXR is enabled.

Any members care to comment on the Chendu J-20 Mighty Dragon aircraft portrayed in the film Born to Fly https://www.imdb.com/title/tt22058628/? or the F-35 vs J-10 and J-20 action?

Thanks to VNAO and OP: Flight Model Mod Works well with Suspension Mod VNAO T-45C suspension fix (digitalcombatsimulator.com) Additional Mods: Helios Profile: T45 Goshawk Helios Profile (digitalcombatsimulator.com) Comm activation SRS http://dcssimpleradio.com/ #Only relevant for MP not SP iUFCExport https://apps.apple.com/us/app/iufcexport/id1551491580 Mission: Bankler's CASE I Recovery Trainer https://forum.dcs.world/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=357040&key=85ef75bb510375235fec567e86d82053 T-45C Training by Rudel_chw Flight Model: (SFM) NOTE: Version 1.0.1 https://www.mediafire.com/file/igxeyo81nx1i01w/VNAO_T45_v1.0.1.zip/file Discord aerodynamics = -- Cx = Cx_0 + Cy^2*B2 +Cy^4*B4 { Cy0 = 0.0, -- zero AoA lift coefficient Mzalfa = 6.2, -- coefficients for pitch agility Mzalfadt = 0.7, -- coefficients for pitch agility kjx = 4.5, -- Inertia parametre X - Dimension (clean) airframe drag coefficient at X (Top) Simply the wing area in square meters (as that is a major factor in drag calculations) - smaller = massive inertia kjz = 0.00125, -- Inertia parametre Z - Dimension (clean) airframe drag coefficient at Z (Front) Simply the wing area in square meters (as that is a major factor in drag calculations) Czbe = -0.016, -- coefficient, along Z axis (perpendicular), affects yaw, negative value means force orientation in FC coordinate system cx_gear = 0.07, -- coefficient, drag, gear ?? cx_flap = 0.08, -- coefficient, drag, full flaps -- 0.006 for first 10 degrees cy_flap = 0.21, -- coefficient, normal force, lift, flaps -- 0.095 for first 10 degrees cx_brk = 0.12, -- coefficient, drag speedbrake (0.04 for speedbrake, extra 0.08 to emulate the spoilers (see spoilers.lua and airbrakes.lua)) --[[ OLD table table_data = { -- M Cx0 Cya B B4 Omxmax Aldop Cymax {0.0, 0.012, 0.10, 0.04, 0.03, 0.5, 14, 1.0, }, {0.4, 0.0145, 0.10, 0.04, 0.03, 10.56, 14, 1.4, }, {0.5, 0.015, 0.09, 0.04, 0.03, 11.56, 14, 1.5, }, {0.6, 0.015, 0.08, 0.04, 0.03, 12.56, 14, 1.6, }, {0.7, 0.015, 0.07, 0.04, 0.03, 11.56, 14, 1.5, }, {0.8, 0.015, 0.06, 0.04, 0.03, 10.56, 14, 1.4, }, -- Cx0 {0.85, 0.015, 0.06, 0.04, 0.03, 9.56, 14, 1.4, }, -- 0.030 {0.9, 0.045, 0.05, 0.04, 0.03, 9.56, 14, 1.4, }, -- 0.060 }--]] -- slat extension is automatic below 200 KCAS, linear to 100 KCAS -- effect of slats is higher AoA possible, higher drag, higher lift -- slat Cd at M0.6 is ~0.016 for 20 degree slat extension, with linear mapping -- slat Cl at M0.6 is ~0.06/degree for 20 degree slat extension, 2/3 comes from the first 10 degrees --[[ -- attempt #1 from naca report table_data = { -- M Cx0 Cya B B4 Omxmax Aldop Cymax {0.00, 0.0320, 0.066, 0.04, 0.03, 0.5, 14.50, 1.11, }, {0.15, 0.0320, 0.066, 0.04, 0.03, 10.56, 14.50, 1.11, }, -- 20 degree slat extension at sea level {0.225, 0.0240, 0.064, 0.04, 0.03, 10.56, 12.50, 0.89, }, -- 10 degree slat extension at sea level {0.30, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.04, 0.03, 10.56, 10.50, 0.77, }, -- 0 degree slat extension at sea level {0.40, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.04, 0.03, 10.56, 10.30, 0.75, }, {0.50, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.04, 0.03, 11.56, 10.20, 0.73, }, {0.60, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.04, 0.03, 12.56, 10.10, 0.71, }, {0.70, 0.0163, 0.062, 0.04, 0.03, 11.56, 9.90, 0.68, }, {0.80, 0.0165, 0.066, 0.04, 0.03, 10.56, 8.75, 0.65, }, {0.85, 0.0180, 0.070, 0.04, 0.03, 9.56, 8.25, 0.60, }, {0.88, 0.0190, 0.078, 0.04, 0.03, 9.56, 8.25, 0.68, }, {0.9, 0.0200, 0.079, 0.04, 0.03, 9.56, 6.50, 0.72, }, {1.0, 0.0200, 0.073, 0.04, 0.03, 9.56, 6.50, 0.74, }, {1.1, 0.0200, 0.065, 0.04, 0.03, 9.56, 6.80, 0.74, }, } --]] -- now correcting for parasitic drag (drag index) -- roughly 1.5x at the top end to model a drag index of ~40 when empty -- removed 10 degree slat line, was causing SFM interpolation bug -- Cya max M0.15 of 0.95 results in approach noflap=137-140, fullflap=120-123 targets: 143/126 @ 14,000# -- test: change Cya 0.96 -> 0.92 for M0.0 and M0.15, leave Cya 0.71 for M0.30, test at 14000# -- result: 138-141 noflap, 121-123 flaps -- test: Cya 0.92 -> 0.84 for M<=0.15, 0.71->0.66 M0.3, 14K# -- result: 145-147 noflap, 126-127 flaps -- test: Cya normalization 0.60 @ M0.40, 0.61 @ 0.30, 14K# -- result: 145-147 noflap, 126-127 flaps -- test: Cya 0.84->0.85 M<=0.15, 14K# -- result: 144-147 noflap, 125-126 flaps close! -- test: Cya 0.85->0.86, Cyflap 0.22->0.21, 14000# -- result: 143-146 noflap, 126-127 flaps close for 14K# -- test: Cya 0.86->0.87 M<=0.15 -- result: 142-145 noflap, 125-126 flaps done for 14K# (on target) -- test: weight 12K#, target: 135/116.5 -- result: 131-133 noflap, 115-116 flaps done for 12K# (~2% too little lift w/o flaps) -- test: weight 16K#, target: 153/134 -- result: 152-156 noflap, 134-135 flaps done for 16K# (on target) --[[ table_data = { -- M Cx0 Cya B B4 Omxmax Aldop Cymax {0.00, 0.0220, 0.087, 0.149, 0.00, 0.5, 13.15, 1.11, }, {0.15, 0.0220, 0.087, 0.149, 0.00, 1.0, 13.15, 1.11, }, -- 20 degree slat extension at sea level {0.30, 0.0160, 0.061, 0.149, 0.00, 4.5, 11.50, 0.77, }, -- 0 degree slat extension at sea level {0.40, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.149, 0.00, 6.5, 10.30, 0.75, }, {0.50, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.149, 0.00, 8.0, 10.20, 0.73, }, {0.60, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.149, 0.00, 8.1, 10.10, 0.71, }, {0.70, 0.0190, 0.062, 0.149, 0.00, 8.3, 9.90, 0.68, }, {0.80, 0.0200, 0.066, 0.149, 0.00, 8.3, 8.75, 0.65, }, {0.85, 0.0215, 0.070, 0.149, 0.00, 8.1, 8.25, 0.60, }, {0.88, 0.0245, 0.078, 0.169, 0.00, 7.8, 8.25, 0.68, }, {0.9, 0.0310, 0.079, 0.179, 0.00, 7.6, 6.50, 0.72, }, {1.0, 0.0350, 0.073, 0.352, 0.00, 7.6, 6.50, 0.74, }, {1.1, 0.0370, 0.065, 0.460, 0.00, 7.6, 6.80, 0.74, }, } --]] table_data = { -- M Cx0 Cya B B4 Omxmax Aldop Cymax {0.00, 0.0220, 0.087, 0.149, 0.00, 0.5, 22.91, 1.40, }, {0.15, 0.0220, 0.087, 0.149, 0.00, 1.0, 22.91, 1.40, }, -- 20 degree slat extension at sea level {0.30, 0.0160, 0.061, 0.149, 0.00, 4.5, 22.91, 1.30, }, -- 0 degree slat extension at sea level {0.40, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.149, 0.00, 6.5, 22.91, 1.22, }, {0.48, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.149, 0.00, 7.5, 22.91, 1.05, }, {0.50, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.149, 0.00, 8.0, 22.34, 1.00, }, {0.55, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.149, 0.00, 8.0, 20.91, 0.96, }, {0.60, 0.0160, 0.060, 0.149, 0.00, 8.1, 18.33, 0.91, }, {0.65, 0.0175, 0.061, 0.149, 0.00, 8.2, 22.63, 0.89, }, {0.70, 0.0190, 0.062, 0.149, 0.00, 8.3, 25.21, 0.88, }, {0.80, 0.0200, 0.066, 0.149, 0.00, 8.3, 23.60, 0.86, }, {0.85, 0.0215, 0.070, 0.149, 0.00, 8.1, 21.77, 0.80, }, {0.88, 0.0245, 0.078, 0.169, 0.00, 7.8, 19.00, 0.76, }, {0.9, 0.0310, 0.079, 0.179, 0.00, 7.6, 18.33, 0.76, }, {0.95, 0.0335, 0.075, 0.280, 0.00, 7.6, 13.18, 0.76, }, {1.0, 0.0350, 0.073, 0.352, 0.00, 7.6, 10.30, 0.76, }, {1.1, 0.0370, 0.065, 0.460, 0.00, 7.6, 10.10, 0.76, }, } -- M - Mach number -- Cx0 - Coefficient, drag, profile, of the airplane -- Cya - Normal force coefficient of the wing and body of the aircraft in the normal direction to that of flight. Inversely proportional to the available G-loading at any Mach value. (lower the Cya value, higher G available) per 1 degree AOA -- B2 - Polar 2nd power coeff -- B4 - Polar 4th power coeff -- Omxmax - roll rate, rad/s -- Aldop - Alfadop Max AOA at current M - departure threshold -- Cymax - Coefficient, lift, maximum possible (ignores other calculations if current Cy > Cymax) }, -- end of aerodynamics Suspension mods from https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3317885/ ------------------------ Gear --------------------------------------------- nose_gear_pos = {3.7, -1.86, 0}, -- {forward/back,up/down,left/right} used for initial aircraft placement nose_gear_amortizer_direct_stroke = 0.1882, -- down from nose_gear_pos nose_gear_amortizer_reversal_stroke = -0.365, -- max strut compression up from nose_gear_pos nose_gear_amortizer_normal_weight_stroke = -0.235, nose_gear_wheel_diameter = 0.525, tand_gear_max = 0.64, -- nosewheel steering angle. (tan(32.6)=0.64 +/-32 degrees) main_gear_pos = {-0.3, -2.18, 1.76}, -- used for initial aircraft placement main_gear_amortizer_direct_stroke = 0.1882, -- down from main_gear_pos main_gear_amortizer_reversal_stroke = -0.5795, -- max strut compression up from main_gear_pos main_gear_amortizer_normal_weight_stroke = -0.615, main_gear_wheel_diameter ##################### @Fresh Hi Seavoyage, please tell me how you found out about all this? I am new to programming mods and I would like to update the T-45C. You only just joined the forums, but looking at what you posted you are not new. Which file should I backup and edit? Thanks, Fresh ##################### VNAO_T45.lua (v1.0.1) file under the 'SFM' (Standard Flight Model) section: the changes are 'aerodynamics' parameters. 'engine' parameter remain the same. Under the 'Gear' section, the suspension mods shorten the landing gear by increasing the stroke: nose_gear_amortizer_direct_stroke = 0.1882, -- down from nose_gear_pos nose_gear_amortizer_reversal_stroke = -0.365, -- max strut compression up from nose_gear_pos nose_gear_amortizer_normal_weight_stroke = -0.235, main_gear_amortizer_direct_stroke = 0.1882, -- down from main_gear_pos main_gear_amortizer_reversal_stroke = -0.5795, -- max strut compression up from main_gear_pos main_gear_amortizer_normal_weight_stroke = -0.615,