Red_Dragon

I realized that I was missing such an option for the joystick. On the one hand, I lack the precision of my joystick (Cobra M5) for proper refueling. On the other hand, I don't see the point in buying a new grip with more buttons for my Gunfighter 3. Since a new grip can cost 200- 300 usd and all I need is the usual option to reduce the axis response so that my cheaper joystick could work fine in DCS. On the other hand, many pilots in the DCS, as I know, often use cheap joysticks just like me, so many I think have significant difficulties with refueling. After all, the movements of such a joystick do not correspond to the movements of a real stick in an airplane. Those who have VIRPIL or VKB joysticks can program the reduction of axis to the joystick button. But the others don't. What do you think about this? Dear Deka Ironwork Simulations, could you add such an option for refueling?

It turned out that raindrops only work with a high-quality cockpit option, so this is solved

So, I tried the same thing, but starting in the air, and you're right, in this case, the map shows correctly. Thanks again.

Yes, thanks, it looks like you're right! I have to try the ways you suggested.

No, comrade, I don't think that's the case. I used a route with only one point for clarity. I already have the desired speed and height set in the editor for that point. This is Mach 0.5 or 613 km/h. Next, here's a picture from Chuck's famous guide I expect the waypoint caret to indicate 340 knots or 380 miles, which corresponds to 613 km/h and Mach 0.5. But you can see that the indication is much much higher. It remains much higher even though I'm already flying at 830 km/h or Mach 0.7. This happens at all points along the route. I can make a route with 10 or 20 points, but I always see the same thing, the carets are always above the set speed for the route.

I set the speed of Mach 0.5 in the editor for the first point. null But in flight, I always see the speed on the HUD higher than 0.5 and much higher. null Often I can't even reach that speed. null In this case, I've already reached Mach 0.7, but I haven't even reached the set speed, although I set Mach 0.5 for the first point in the editor.

I think this effect used to be when choosing a high option of raindrops and was absent when choosing a low one. Now I don't see the drop effect even with the high option. null

null Не очень понятно. У меня на джефе пока не вышло... Но всеже 1) В редакторе у меня уже установлена опция поведения-боевого порядка: плотный, правый (в данном случае) пеленг. Нужна ли ещё и доп команда для посадки парой и если нужна, то какая из отображенных на скрине? 2) И как узнать, какие параметры глиссады боту нравятся? Если садится за ботом например, то глиссады у него адские ИМХО, на грани срыва часто, скорость может держать минимальную.. С другой стороны в воздухе бот корректирует и скорость и траекторию самым бессовестным образом, почему вдруг тут при приземлении стесняется и боится? И возвращаясь к вопросу, о пар-рах глиссады, на какой скорости вы коснулись ВВП на су 27? 3) Еще не понятно, а как взлетать парой с ботом. Вот я встал на полосе, а бот (настроен на прав.пеленг, плотный строй) ждет чего то (извиняюсь, не лучший скрин, но понять можно -бот на правой полосе ждет, что б занять любимую середину) null . Пока я не пошел на разбег, так и стоял, ожидая. Я встал не правильно или что то еще? Вообще бот может взлетать вместе в ведомым?

Шок! В Новый Год без новогодних лампочек на форуме

Здравствуйте! Есть какой то способ заставить ведомого бота садится с ведущим (мной, занимаю самоль как "клиент") одновременно, парой? Когда я к примеру сажусь на правую сторону ВПП и ведомый-бот находится слева, на достаточно конечно широкую полосу. Сейчас при каждой посадке ведомый удирает внезапно наверх, хотя садимся аккуратно. Не ужели это не возможно в симе?

No historic paks for Soviet era.. Sadly there is nothing about Soviet period of Afgan map. No soviet cars for auto traffic, no An 12, no soviet troopers in appropriate uniform.. I saw only An 12 unofficial mod, but I have had problems with it.

And you're not ED to determine for them what to do and how to perceive customer problems.

You are either a hopeless egoist or too young to understand that there are many people with poor eyesight and very very poor eyesight. Secondly, even GOOD equipment gives very different results. I didn't see any contacts on my 36 inch monitor at 1080, while my friend with the same 1080 resolution saw contacts like huge fat flies. But u don't care.....

This is the first time I've seen contacts on my monitor.. As it turns out, I can only see contacts with the 2 pixel option, even though I'm using 1080 for my 36 inch monitor.. But what about the reflection slider in the cockpit? I tried it on Jeff and the slider doesn't work.

In many photos and videos of the evidence, you can see a wide variety of vegetation. On the map of Syria, unfortunately, now IMHO the variety of vegetation is too simplistic and looks too uniform in all areas of the map. This is the Khmeimim air base IRL This is the Khmeimim air base or Bassel al-Assad air base in DCS Video of Khmeimim (Bassel al-Assad) air base Colors.. from satellite In game also on the Google map, here you can see part of the landscape, it doesn't look like a very desert pattern like on the map of Syria

It looks very unrealistic, in addition to this, these stones are even in the path of airplanes! Of course, these are fake stones and they do not interfere with taxing, but it breaks immersion I used the low settings of the terrain in the hope of not seeing the stones, but it didn't help

As title said.. I think this is more noticeable on maps like PG and Sinai. I also see it in singleplayer and multiplayer. I deleted the shader folder, but I think it's not related to my computer, so I see it on different computers. When I under low cloud level And when I climb above them, they are almost completely grey. But the other layer of clouds, which is still a little higher than me, it remains white

So far, I really LIKED the "dust storm" and much less fog. I think the "dust storm" is the most important addition to such maps as Afghanistan, Sinai, and the Persian Gulf.. But I am in doubt about fog. Why? Perhaps it will not be so noticeable on the map of Normandy or Cola, but on the map of the Caucasus it is too clearly visible that the fog is incredibly homogeneous, it is so perfectly homogeneous that the feeling of artificiality does not leave you the whole flight

Thank you, this is what I needed! By the way, this book seems really interesting

Thank you, this is interesting information, just what interests me. If you have the opportunity or find it possible to find some time for this, it would be great to see a screenshot with the text or maybe just a copied text from the electronic version of the book.. If not, thanks anyway for the information

I probably shouldn't have created a new topic for this question, but I didn't find a more suitable one.,, and the topic with the general discussion of mosquito is closed by the moderator. I had an absurd argument about the job of a mosquito co-pilot. I came across the claim that the navigator could not detect the enemy well on its 6 because he was strapped in and his seat was facing forward.I read Abraham J. Scramble! about that, but is there any documentary evidence of the co-pilot's duty to observe plane's six? It seems absurd to me, but has anyone come across more accurate information about the work of the co-pilot during the mosquito flight? And can anyone tell me exactly what the position of the co-pilot was called in the documents of that time. English is not my native language, so it is difficult for me to navigate and formulate correct queries in Google. Is there any documentary information that the duties of the co-pilot included observation or maybe vice versa (of course I don't really think so) am I wrong and the co-pilot was not obliged to watch plane's 6?

It doesn't really look like the reason is simply the difficulties of development. The developers were going to release this module in the spring of last year.. Or the year before last? The developers wrote that most of the module was ready. So I honestly don't understand what's going on.

У всех по разному. У меня как раз DCS форум через раз грузится стал в яндексе. Некоторые дни вообще не грузится

In 2024 I would say that I expect ATC not only to be realistic, but also to recognize speech.. But maybe we won't see an improvement even of what we have now.