59th_Reaper

Very small update:)

Don't be afraid guys! The project is not dead, but Krieger hasn't got free time at now. Small update soon as possible...

np ;)

http://walkarounds.airforce.ru/avia/rus/mig/mig-29smt/mig-29smt.htm

Sorry, but this project is nonpublic (yet)...

Don't fear guys!:-D We're working on our airbase project. We'll continue the Fulcrum model within 1-2 months! S!

The Fulcrum project is breaking now, through other projects.

Like this... http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=878622&postcount=224

We don't know yet. It's a very complicated work, so i think the date will first half or middle of 2011...

...or when the Duke Nukem 4ever released... :D

ED and the tools release?:) LOL What is the date, April 1st?:-D

Why are heat effects on the wingtails?:-DDD

IJ:-D

20 years in navy, and? We must sitting into our ass from that? It's a sim, not real life. Were you a fighter pilot? I think not...

You don't know... Do you speak hungarian? I think not...

Just for you: Fox leather = When a company is pull down you (customer) again and again with a product, what is same as like before products (some differents, but the base is same). I hope i can help you... S!

Jól van hülye gyerek, inkább pihenjél...

Ok guys... You can't see the forest for the trees. Good luck for assist of the "ED's 6th fox leather" project, and have a nice fly in single player combat! P.S.: 22 years, i won...

Man, man! You don't understand nothing. This is a simulator and we're in 2010. If we're following your train of thought the Chuck Yeager Combat's graphic is enough for a battle sim... Ha-ha. I don't like the FSX, but some graphic features is very good in that sim. Else. If the ED can't make realistic sounds (YOU SAID THIS, NOT ME), why they call their sound engine "Realistic"? And please select your words, because i flew with sims then, when you're a simply mind of your parent's head...

Thank you for your answer, but some things. I saw the A-10 screenshots and i know how many work to do this. Nice graphics but the DX11 have more features than this. Example FSX... I know this unfair contrasting, because the Microsoft is a very different company (the biggest) than the ED. And the FSX is not perfect product neither. Realistic sounds: I think you need to go a military airbase and pls listen the sounds (especially the plane moving, afterburners, flybys etc.). And this new engine (in DCS/FC2) have got so many bugs... Clouds: I think the clouds in the DCS:A-10C are really pretty than the FC's clouds, but henceforward are "MS paint style"... And dynamic/different weather is still not in the game. You flying in same weather everywhere... Check this: http://www.realenvironmentxtreme.com/gallery.html I don't want blame the ED, but it's my and some people's opinion...

Dear Viper (and the ED testers, lol)! When you detect the bug in your testing product, then will be a real tester... Until then you say clever things, but they will be disbelieving. Only one example (of numerous): The cockpit deck moving (open-close) sound is same as the cockpit sound. It was detected within 5 secs of the first run... Nice testing!:) But no offense and this is offtopic at here... Cheers

I fully understand that, but i don't know what is the concept. If you made this (porting FC1 into FC2(with DCS module)), why do you leave this line at now? If the DCS is a brand new engine (of course not), why don't you making new features really like engine smoke, various photorealistic clouds, dynamic weather, realistic sounds, multicrew planes,etc.? I see only a product with slightly upgraded Lock On graphics and 1-1 nice detailed (AFM, cockpit) plane.

So, what you are said: FC2 is a repaired FC1. If is true, why not a simply 1.13 patch only and why compatible with BS? And why is a payment product? It's only a repaired version, you said...

Gratulations! You've rived the essence from my minds... Why the ED invest his energy into the FC2 project if leave this now? Fox leather effect?

Dear ED! The DCS series is a simply LO clone. You're saying it's a brand new product, but not. This program has same good things and bad things from the Flanker2.0+LO+FC trio. What other that is the garnish (newer DX, menus, etc.). I don't see the concept in the DCS series. Why don't you make a start-up base and you must make only the new planes in the future. DCS:A-10C plenty other like the DCS:BS, but you're saying it's a series. The ED said a long time ago: "We will publish new planes (with AFM, clickable cockpit) by 9 months..." Where are these planes? The BS was came out in March of 2009. I think these are 17 months, but the next plane is nowhere. I agree with Frazer in the compatibility question. I think of course so many people will play with DCS:A-10C, but the "only 1 plane sims" age was expired... The people would like playing online with different planes. If you don't respect this, you're on the bad way... P.S.: I like the ED's product (Flanker series, LO, FC), but i would like any powerful concurrency by now, because the ED is sitting on the bay... Best regards, 59th_Reaper