Jump to content

Creampie

Members
  • Posts

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Creampie

  1. Is it possible to maybe make the spotting dots scale with resolution? It seems it really only helps with 1080, A little bit with 1440 & No noticable difference with 4k. I would like to play the game in 4k as it looks a lot better. But seeing things is just incredibly difficult for me personally. I shouldn't have to play the game in a lower resolution to utilize this feature to its potential. Would just be a really nice feature to have some use in higher resolutions.
  2. The group I play with have not noticed any increase in CPU usage, only temps. Even after rolling the update back just to compare. CPU temp is certainly the concern of DCS when their consumers are having issues due to an unexpected error with an update. However it is not of concern if people keep playing on the update and damage their hardware (not likely) Not much though went into your proposed title change.
  3. Pretty common thing with ARMs in DCS when there is a target jamming, HOJ
  4. Same result on both of my machines, 7950x +20c on average 14900k + 22c on average This is just sitting in the main menu lol. Actual memes
  5. Bump Are there plans to make the new weapon available? @BIGNEWY
  6. Excuse my understanding, But that means no current plan to alter any current employed weapons?
  7. With the altercation of the 701 to the 701R on the Deka module JF-17, What other weapons do you guys plan on altering since you have control of them now? There are a lot of very unique weapons on the JF17, BRMs, 802aks, AKG, 400(soon?). I only ask because even the 701s where in a pretty good spot & I am not sure why they had been changed in the first place. Leads me to wonder about its more unique weapons.
  8. Deleting these files fixes the issue, @Flappie @BIGNEWY missing_texture.bmp missing_texture_highvis.bmp missing_texture_NM.bmp missing_texture_roughmet.tga missing_texture_volumetric.dds Voronka.dds Voronka_beton.tga Voronka_beton_Height.tga Voronka_beton_Normal.tga Voronka_Height.tga Voronka_Normal.tga Voronka_RoughMet.dds From DCS World>Bazar>TempTextures
  9. Link is broken
  10. I'm pretty sure it's destroyed ground units doing it. Some of them are just really large bomb craters you see under destroyed vehicles.
  11. nullWhy in the heck???
  12. It is differential. Sometimes it won't do it at all. Most times it does this, on old & new.
  13. After doing a little more digging It seems to be a conflict between configuration panel/rearming panel. Below is a picture of how the JF auto starts with no user input. (Assuring codes are 1688 on rearm page before spawning) Either pylon #2 or #6 will have the correct code & you have to manually change each one, Rather than "Apply to all pylons"
  14. Since ME/Laser code updates to -001. I've noticed this in multiplayer and single player autostarts & manual starts tacview not needed.
  15. What would be unrealistic about it?
  16. What does this even mean?
  17. Any word?
  18. Thank you for solidifying my point of the $8 Mig29. Clicky cockpits are fun, its what I want in a module. But for most people it not really offering anything aside from that, I personally don't think it will offer us much.
  19. Oh I don't mean it with malice, I am happy about it, Good for them. I've dropped mk84s on them and theyve flown away
  20. What server banned you guys from flying the chinook?
  21. Sure, This game is built completely on the a PvE mindset. I am using PVP as an example, as it does represent a fair amount of people. PVE represents the majority of DCS, So naturally they would structure that first and foremost. But basing the justifcation around information is quite foolish, A prime example is this F35, They have sheer speculation. Sure, there are FC3 red aircraft, but thats all there ever has been. Look at the FF 9.12 that is coming, It is nothing different besides a clicky cockpit, fighting things it has no parity with. Soon to be fighting EF & F35s, It doesn't make sense. There is plenty of information on aircraft like the Su-30MKK (completely declassified), J-10A, Mi28nm & a slew of other eastern block aircraft, saying it is based off of information is just incredibly false. I like many other do not care they are making some module that will be a gimmick, I do however care & ED should too, they are just missing such a large mark with red aircraft. Deka has a Su30MKK, They've been working on it since like 2020 or something. Let them release it.
  22. It's quite simple for a lot of us; (From a red enjoying PVP perspective) Put the EF & F35 aside for a moment There is zero parity in a counter-part, F18/16/14/etc > jf/27/29/etc by a large margin Now bring the EF & F35 back in; F35/EF > F18/16/14/etc > jf/27/29/etc Even the PVP aspect aside, Many of us love aircraft other than NATO ones.
  23. Close F35 thread too then.
×
×
  • Create New...