

cript
Members-
Posts
41 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Hi, It's the first time I feel so "involved" in the missions I fly. Many thanks to you Apache600 for this amazing work ! Lots of details and a true "writing" talent. Tomorrow morning I take off with the Su25s:smilewink:
-
Advices for settings with G940 and SimFFB
cript replied to cript's topic in DCS: Mi-8MTV2 Magnificent Eight
Thanks for your reply. Yes it's somewhat a shame. Many new modules but many incomplete ones. -
Need som help, please! how to???
cript replied to buspelle's topic in DCS: Mi-8MTV2 Magnificent Eight
This article is a must ! Many thanks ! :thumbup: -
Hi, I read a lot of threads about the Mi8 trim, the G940 settings and trim problems, SimFFB and curves to set or not... etc. But I am still not satisfied with my settings ; could you please give your opinions and advices ? I play the 1.5.7. version on Win7 x64. In Ka50 the default trim works pretty well with the G940 as the stick stays in position when I trim. In Mi8 it is not. Even the "diamond" which appears with the "RCtrl+Enter" does not change its default place when I trim. Well I understood that's because the Mi8 trim system is only here to relieve efforts on the stick while the trim button is pressed. I guess it should be "felt" in the FFB of the G940. It is not. I tried the SimFFB software, and after having guessed that the "Init ..." menu option was here to send new FFB settings to the stick, I tried different configurations. I also guessed that the number on the right was to tell SimFFB which button was the trim one in DCS (mine is the stick button "S4", labelled nb 6 in DCS configuration). I still have no clue to what I should select to have a proper FFB stick behavior with the Mi8 ! Thanks for your replies. :helpsmilie:
-
There ! I bought today the mi8 [emoji16]It's just a beginning of a long story I hope ! Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
-
Yes I have the G940 system from Logitech, and the FFB works well with the trim of Ka50. So I hope it can be the same thing for the Mi8. Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
-
Thanks to all for your advices.
-
How would you qualify the difficulty to fly the Mi8 compared to the Ka50 ? I still have problems to stay at one point even with auto hover when I am looking for enemies with Shkval, so I am afraid to have problems with Mi8 [emoji17] Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
-
DCS sky and blur effects
cript replied to tacannav's topic in Release Version Bugs and Problems (Read only)
Check your graphic card drivers ? Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk -
Sorry, didn't understand [emoji848] Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
-
I thought about the 123 button on the G940, but I don't know for the 300S, sorry. In addition, I wonder now if curves can be changed on the fly with buttons. An "alt tab " procedure could probably do it, but immersion won't be good [emoji16] Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
-
There is something similar which can be done for the Logitech G940 with the Logitech profiler software. But as said with TM Target, it's an external program. Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
-
Thanks for your replies. I tried some new flights in A10C : still the "computer feeling". I tried some new ones also in Ka50 and it's like I feel the machine a bit more :) When there will be new sales, I think the Mi-8 will be mine !
-
The UH1 and Mi8 are "multi crew" (I don't speak about the long awaited spec) : are these modules still playable or enjoyable solo ? At least with Ka50 or A10C I know that I should be able to "do all these things myself", whereas in multi crew crafts, I can still blame that I'm only one person :clown:
-
Thanks a lot to all of you. Well I'm fond of WWII warplanes but I don't have Normandy map or 2.0 version for now ; I feel it's a bit early for WWII in DCS and keep on Il2 1946 or Il2 Clodo with Team Fusion mod for this era. In DCS, I love 1970's and modern machines. I think I like a bit more Soviet ones too. Perhaps it makes me think about my youngest flights in front of a PC (Flight of the Intruder by Microprose and Su27 by SSI...:)) All in all, that's why I had been attracted by the Mig21 bis module. I seemed to me that there was plenty of avionics to master but with a "flight feeling and clunky ergonomics" still there. A few years ago the A10C gave me the "flying a computer feeling" indeed. For the Ka50, I remembered giving up when it was about giving orders to wingmen and mastering the multiple autopilot modes. About the bugs, I'm really ready to have avionics defaults modelised (as in mig15 or Mig 21 modules) but I will not give time to master them if it's because of a module bug and not "real". I stick with 1.5.7. version for now. I almost forgot to say that plenty of training missions and a campaign were a positive thing for me, as in the Mig21 module. The Mig15 disappointed me for this reason (no free campaign and training missions a bit scarce).