Jump to content

magnetic

Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About magnetic

  • Birthday 02/02/1969

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS World
  • Location
    France
  1. Yes, changing the programming language is a dizzy well in cost and time but I remain convinced that RUST is worth it for its robustness and at 53 years old I learn it...After I do not know the.language used by the teams of dcs. What is it mainly? Well I was dreaming when I asked this but I hope that the leaders have in mind the future of their company, and AI will become very powerful...
  2. For more efficiency, no memory leaks and fast speed core with lower consumption ! I think developpers can try an alpha with RUST language just with 3% slow against C language and similar C++ writing. Now chatGPT can translate some part of codes with great quality ! Possible ?
  3. I see today a new work with better visual explosions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWd1m4okJl8
  4. New explosions better I think , more realist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWd1m4okJl8
  5. Hello, Thanks for reply, after verification no problem on my computer. I tested that and compare with mersh rockets: and the real sounds from real scud here :
  6. Hello, I try scud B mod, thanks for all but I don't hear sound ? No sound ?
  7. For the Tacan Mod , are there same soluce with Moose script API ? Here : https://flightcontrol-master.github.io/MOOSE_DOCS/Documentation/Core.Radio.html##(BEACON).New
  8. I show you a too bright lights from AI planes (Othher too?) , I think this light is too bright in reality life not the same: Here DCS
  9. Really Flagon is wonderfull machine ! I want too !
  10. What this version ? What the official ? I have 1.6.1.0 https://github.com/ciribob/DCS-SimpleRadioStandalone Right or not ? Thanks
  11. Eagle Dynamics planned separate sounds now or not ?
  12. I think DCS can make realist explosions, now multicore can do that ! They can 2D or "sprite fake explosions" for far view and near can make with classic method
  13. DCS have a big problem with realism with smoke and explosions, maybe this effects will be settings for more or less realism, if the problem is stonger PC or lighter PC configuration. DCS 2.0 and directx11 give more realism for water ? Warthunder or arma 3 have a really good effect of the sea. I dont understand why DCS dont work better smoke, clouds or explosions; contrail ( VERY BAD EFFECT, better on F15c around winglet) Smoke more better on other sim or games, THESE EFFECTS ARE THE SOUL OF THE GOOD and IMMERSIVE SENSATION, WHEN I PILOT A PLANE INTO A SIM. IT'S IMPORTANT ! NOT FOR YOU ? The future Directx12 give more power for computation, staff of DCS have plan for use the best of DirectX 12 ?
  14. Flight test with skin "Caucasian" from TDC (Tueurs de Chars) virtual pilot squad BUMBee magnetic
×
×
  • Create New...