Jump to content

pepin1234

Members
  • Posts

    3830
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by pepin1234

  1. On 5/21/2025 at 2:06 PM, AeriaGloria said:

    It is unknown if ED will give it S-5, but it won’t have S-13 or S-25. It will have all S-8 variants and S-24B for sure. 
     

    Bombs and KMGU also. 
     

    The CCIP/CCRP doesn’t correct for wind unless you pre designate the target and wait 2-8 seconds before firing, but you can also correct for target movement using this method. 
     

    Unlike FC3, its AG mode will likely be limited to 5 km but it depends how ED models it. 

    Can you read carefully the pre purchase post. That talk about that. LRF refer to the IRST laser such is use it for dive bombing

  2. I set upscaling in DCS and then in the AMD software I set Performance settings with Super Resolution ON. After open the game the display change to the lower resolution set in DCS and don't upscale to the max resolution of my display keeping side blank space on the screen. I just update the DCS today.

  3. 2 hours ago, AeriaGloria said:

    Is there a source for any of this? R-27ER uses the exact same seeker as R-27R 

    If you search in Internet, you will find out the head seeker for export was made in Ukraine. It's probably the same head seeker for both variants. Russians made another company for home build their own head seekers. Probably the only way to identify which one it is S/N. Notice Russians show R-27 in Syria, and they always were hiding the S/N.

    they have been made the same for the ex-Soviet hardware made in ex Soviets republics. Example the Su-25 are rebuild in Russia instead to keep production in Georgia. For the legal instance they are restored...

     

  4. 5 hours ago, BIGNEWY said:

    FAQ is now live 

     


     

    Can you please add in the FAQ what is the new implementation of CEC or ECM countermeasures? The current ECM Jamming in your video, blinded the MiG-29A radar. 
     

    That is not only new for MiG-29A but for the whole DCS core. Or do you want to keep only the whole Russian side blinded by ECM? 
     

    if you want to simulate the superiority of USAF ECM versus old Soviet fighters then at least make some changes in the DCS core for the rest of airborne radars modules because is impossible Su-34, Su-30 ECM's stay the same for USAF radars after you want to introduce this abusing implementation for jamming MiG-29A only?

    IMG_0930.jpeg

  5. 6 hours ago, BIGNEWY said:

    folks please try not to derail the topic to much.

    As always the mission creators and server owners can create missions tailored to the type of game play they want. 

    thank you 

    I think what they are trying to tell is we don’t have an AI with proper 3D model to set as 80 timeline enemy for earlier MiG-29 in Cold War conflict. Nobody want to set in Mission Editor those ugly models of F-16A and F-18A

    • Like 3
  6. On 4/24/2025 at 6:40 AM, FoxAlfa said:

    Also, Iraqis didn't get a 'better' MiG-23MLA, but a 'worser' MiG-23MLD that the soviets. Timeline and phrasing matters

    Also Iraq's Mig-29 didn’t have ever R-73. All USAF victories over Mig-29 in Iraq were against R-60 only payload on MiG-29. That detail was not ever told in the propaganda documentaries. It’s valid to say there have been two sceneries with full equipped MiG-29. Eritrea vs Ethiopia and now the current Ukrainian war. All Yugoslavia combats also happened with MiG-29 out of combat order in avionics matters.

    • Like 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Silver_Dragon said:

    What misinformation? Welcome to the real world. When other companies try to make a lousy truck or sports car and you have to go get a license... even in the "civilian" aircraft sector, if you try to make certain brands, they come down on you with a hammer. Now, imagine in the military sector (this forum has already provided extensive examples of what you can and can't do, with certain examples from the land military market).... keep thinking the whole world is a damn conspiracy theory.

    You don’t have idea what you’re talking about. The only I can tell you is that " Life have more opportunities and options, try another things "

    now report my post as you often do…

    • Like 1
  8. 5 hours ago, Silver_Dragon said:

    Belsimtek rejoin by ED long before the Mi-24 project was launched. It's one of the studies that handles the modern modules, and no, there won't be a Belsimtek 2.0. Any Russian/Soviet aircraft requires a license from the current rights holders. This isn't just about making a Su-25K, and that's it. It's already part of DCS World. Sukhoi could issue a cease and desist order, or, as has happened in the Russian section, ban all its helicopter russian / soviet products in Russia (remember the Tu-22M project). Everything requires a license, and contract negotiations..

    Try another way to keep the disinformation. It’s getting old and everyone can see is not a believable story…

    • Like 1
  9. On 4/27/2025 at 9:13 PM, NineLine said:

    I have asked the same question previously, and even the Su-25 was still very protected. 

    What makes differences between DCS Mi-24 and never made by ED DCS Su-25? You made Mi-24… Belsimtek? Bulgaria had (maybe all them were ended to the current war) Su-25K. Please go ahead and make the same Mi-24 and Mi-8 move for exported or obsolete Soviet aircraft! The list is long! Su-25K Bulgarian, MiG-25 some where in a museum from ex Baltics republics, Su-22M4 ex GDR and now Poland and more and more. Make Belsimtek 2.0 move please

    • Like 2
  10. On 4/23/2025 at 5:15 PM, NineLine said:

    That is simply not true. But let's worry about the current modules before we worry about things not here yet. 

    Don’t forget you have a new Cold War map without the main fighter for red force to fight. MiG-23 was the number 1 fighter of GDR. Mig-29A was not enough at 80s time to cover a real conflict. MiG-23 was the main fighter in numbers. Also in the Soviets bases in GDR were MiG-23 instead of MiG-29.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...