pepin1234
-
Posts
3830 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by pepin1234
-
-
Well, I think we agree that somebody is lying here ;)
internet please. Let's save our words and search yourself
-
If any of you is searching for a HUD photo which shows a F-15 gets locked by a Su-27, I have one and I can upload it tonight.
But it was not a real dog fight: during the visit in 1992, F-15s And Su-27s had a scheduled formation flight, during which a Su-27 made a joke:
http://www.clubhyper.com/reference/f15vssu27sm_1.htm
It broke the formation and locked a F-15 from its rear. The F-15 has 3 fuel tanks and was thus unable to get rid of the tailing flanker. You will see that from the photo.
Don't turn and say me something serious about that:
the same situation with the F-117 " always visible " by the Yugoslavian air defence but also visible by the major Milorad Milutinovic and his mig resulting the F-117 with twice impact, one of them by his R-73.In the real life the USAF have a really hard job against a strong force equiped with russian hardware, the RWR could be into collapse.
and yes I am sorry...
or maybe you are a 16 years old and we are losing the time reading to you.
-
Sorry, man, this was the Falcon downed by ground fire, not by migs
the same situation with the F-117 " always visible " by the Yugoslavian air defence but also visible by the major Milorad Milutinovic and his mig resulting the F-117 with twice impact, one of them by his R-73.
In the real life the USAF have a really hard job against a strong force equiped with russian hardware, the RWR could be into collapse.
and yes I am sorry...
-
Well, could Yougoslavian airforce show a single F-16 wreckage to public?
As far as I know, the Mig29 of Nebojsa Nikolic was shot down by a Dutch F-16 on 6 Apr 1999 and the photo of its wreckage is shown on numerous journals:megalol:
Here we go:
http://www.pbase.com/vmarinkovic/image/30732911
the others two F-15 mentioned in this thread. One of them were able to landing damaged and the other one were seriusly damage getting forced landing at allied territory but retired of the service ( thats why they keep the big lie that the F-15 have not lose in combat )
-
Evidence from reputable source please, or I call bullshit.
if you like evidence, Internet is your place. Read and compared and lets dont be ignorant. Is not a secret that Serbian have not the same powerfull news empire. The best example of how they want to lying to the world, is the current Syrian civil war and his and his fantastic news histories. No more lies!
-
2
-
-
Sorry for OT, but this is a great example of latin phrase "omen nomen" - Nebojsa means "The one which is not affraid" in Czech :smilewink:
They must have a lot of courage to face those fancy modern NATO fighters with their outdated 29s. :v:
and all of them have this medall: They have the " Medalja za Hrabrost " in english means " Medal for Bravery ".
-
Well, any source?
It sounds to me a good story. If a F-16 was shot down, then the Mig must have the hud footage right? We all know that the hud footage of a downed MIG-29 (killed by a F-16 in the no fly zone) in 27 Dec 1992 was opened to public :D
What mean any source for you??
The Yougoslavian Mig-29 had a lot of problems in their radars and a lot of technical problems and were not spare parts for them. They were not able to use their radar. There are 3 Nato F-16 shootdown by yugoslavian Migs by the serbian pilots: Nebojsa Nikolic, Ljubisa Velickovic, Iljo Arizanov, one F-15 by the serbian pilot Zoran Radosavljevic and other F-15 damaged by the serbian pilot Slodoban Peric.
All of them are denied by the most profetional liars ever existed.
-
Yes, you have CNN and some subversive publicity magazine. I have personal testimonies.
Do you have some source or it is common joke of mighty Russian planes being king of the skies?Read here again and look what happen in our game in real time:
First, the main tactic of a Su-25 against an A-10 at his 6, is try to get the faster speed as possible, they are so slow. After a time in straight direction, air brake, throtle in idle and turn 180° geting lower altitud.Anyway our game is going so far when we compared the hardware of both sides. Maybe exist a politic balace, but honestly we should see how the F-15 maneuvers with a full payload at 8000 m, it is complet unreal and in the reality when they do such maneuvers they must going straight into inspection and be grounded.
Adding how ED have gave us the aim-7/120 missiles capability against the R-27/77 missiles with an abusive superiority and a exaggerated reaction capability against targets.
Seeing how the USA ARMY lying constantly hiding the true of some outcome in war. For example in Yugoslavia war a Mig-29 shootdown with R-73 a F-16, after that a spokesman USA Army say the F-16 have a training accident somewhere in USA. :music_whistling:
Or how the afghanistan rebels destroy a expensive and sophisticated armor with a old Soviet mine.:doh:
All that they hold in hiding and we can not allow all that sickly publicity come into our game.
All people wish a Apache helicopter into our game... :police:All right, lets see how is the loop learning with the Huey, first Tail rotor Heli into our game....
-
please keep in calm till the 13.2 drivers become available. The 13.1 driver do not allow automatic update from the software, maybe AMD do not like surprises and is better wait for the next driver at all.
-
First, the main tactic of a Su-25 against an A-10 at his 6, is try to get the faster speed as possible, they are so slow. After a time in straight direction, air brake, throtle in idle and turn 180° geting lower altitud.
Anyway our game is going so far when we compared the hardware of both sides. Maybe exist a politic balace, but honestly we should see how the F-15 maneuvers with a full payload at 8000 m, it is complet unreal and in the reality when they do such maneuvers they must going straight into inspection and be grounded.
Adding how ED have gave us the aim-7/120 missiles capability against the R-27/77 missiles with an abusive superiority and a exaggerated reaction capability against targets.
Seeing how the USA ARMY lying constantly hiding the true of some outcome in war. For example in Yugoslavia war a Mig-29 shootdown with R-73 a F-16, after that a spokesman USA Army say the F-16 have a training accident somewhere in USA. :music_whistling:
Or how the afghanistan rebels destroy a expensive and sophisticated armor with a old Soviet mine.:doh:
All that they hold in hiding and we can not allow all that sickly publicity come into our game.
All people wish a Apache helicopter into our game... :police:All right, lets see how is the loop learning with the Huey, first Tail rotor Heli into our game....
-
1
-
-
Let's be honest. R27 sucked IRL combat..That's a fact. Lot's of them launched in EE conflict, lots of misses..Unless monkeys were flying those jets having no idea how to employ the weapon..I think it's safe to say, the missile failed.
Could you say how many conflicts please. Detailed, and the numbers of missiles launched??
-
1
-
-
it's built to deal with far more sophisticated foes. Just as an F-15E can make insurgents hit the road, so can an F-35.
:megalol: That is true, but at the moment the F-35 is one of the biggest fail of the USA aviation. better redesign to and start again.
-
Answer
1- Will be a big help, some time I set some recon armor forward, then when I need to drive other vehicle the recon vehicle come back to his group. the same with the AAA.
2- Dont think so. One of the best things that brings us the CA is that we do not need the triggers so much. Anyway I dont think that brake a trigger, " All group inside zone " is relative.
3- Well just try to sorprise a tank in a city and when you get to see him, suddenly he turn the cannon aiming you.
4- The same of the 3. Endly you got it but just wait and see how fast you drive back.
5- Confirmed, work and I like it
6- Well I have tested again, and I have to say was my fault. I have to remove the target assigned.
So 5 and 6 please have not sense
-
First say thank for the good job with CA. The Simulator get a new level obviously.
Here are the things I think could be better.
1- When the commander move a single unit of a group, the unit should remain at the new position when the commander leave his unit with the handbreak on. ( a lot of AAA died easyly because they can not stay in a new strategy position to defend the group )
2- Could exist a option to disengage one unit of a group and make a individual unit
3- I dont know how work a gearbox armor, but should exist a single key to set the reverse gear ( right now is so dificult a combat in a city because take so long make the reverse gear )
4- The reverse gear speed is extremely slowly.
5- Some modern tanks have a laser to measure the distance of the target at the same time he shoot. ( now the binoculars view should be always corrected with the cannon )
6- The artillery dont stop to fire when a previous trigger editor have been set pre-mission launched
-
Honestly the campaing is really good, but could be better. I think you should set the Germans armors and the Geppard AAA, also you could add the German Roland. Right now I recomend set just 3 vehicles per group because a big group move together and like that we get a lot of lost units. The recogns units should be implemented in every big group and set just one single unit per group, but separate. The airfield should be defending by better A-A (Buks, Hawks, Kubs etc) and the Rolands, Tunguskas, Tors should be the secundary missile defence for these systems. Dont set triggers for the commanders units, better set some menssage and recomend the actions. Set some MLRS units at both sides. Please set the mission time start 30 min before. Sometimes I find the missions at 5:30 pm, few time for use the light day.
-
Hi. We know that the MLRS have a big impact in the game FPS, but they are a great tool for the ground commander and rarely we see MLRS because that problem. Anyway some day I hope this problem be solved. Here a list of the MLRS we have in the game but we only use a type single rocket per MLRS unit.
---The rockets available for our MLRS are:
BM-21 Grad system: 9M22U rocket
Smerch system: 9M55K rocket
M270 system: M26 rocket
---Here some list of the reality:
BM-21 Grad:
Smerch:
M270:
-
Also. Right now I was playing the mission WAR and the name have not any connection with the campaing. The NATO side have a lot of soviet hardware, Why?? they should not be in this side, not that the soviet hardware are a kaka?? so the NATO should use their wonderfull hardware. Su-25T in the NATO side?? no way, even imagine a Georgia revolution against the ex soviets they just should have Su-25A. Other thing very remarcable is that you set some NATO group around the URRSS airfield side. Do you like make easyly the job for the A-10C and so you brings easyly the coords for the NATO forces. Anyway, you set some A-10C for the URRSS side but they have not easy job because they have not freindly groups around the NATO airfield.:music_whistling::music_whistling:
-
The missions are not bad, but usually you set T-55 against abrams. Also some RED groups are together with slowly vehicle, example one APC truck and a lot of ZU-AAA, these vehicles do not cross the rivers. Some times I find ZU-AAA closed together with a group. Not good idea the ZU-AAA closed is not a vehicle. Also the blue side have all the IR A-A and then the RED side have just some Shilkas. Come on man, thats not fair.
-
2. (here's the kicker) how would you rate the western jets in DCSW from easiest to hardest in terms of WVR and BVR? The F15 DACT followed a logical progression, of older generation fighters to new and faster fighters. However I have NO IDEA who would come out on top BVR or WVR between an F-16 and F-18.
So please, discuss! let me know your opinions!
The russian fighters seem downgraded compared with the F-15. So the best strategy to training and get a good fit, is the Awacs, but the F-15 pilots say they have not bullseye orientation and they are disadvantage, so few servers use the Awacs. Does not matter how much we training because with the new missiles features and the new strategy of ED the Su/migs always will be in disadvantage, but go ahead, I am sure lot of people wish to training.
-
I think is a smart and good decision. The Gripen is cheaper, logic and efficient. At the other hand the F-35 is expensive, unlogic and not efficient at all. Also is not good idea have the canadian army full of USA hardware.:thumbup::smartass:
-
good job. go ahead
-
The AIM-7 is electronically superior to the R-27R, and it has greater range. You are correct, though, the R-27R has higher peak speed..
No, you are not right. The AIM-7 is a missile with a bad background. The R-27R is a missile made to be superior. The only argument you can take to say that is the the russian electronic is "simple" but thats not mean they are inferior. Some time is the contrary. The history can say much about that and also the present with the overview of the F-22 and F-35.
This is a separate problem and I already put in a bug for this, though F-15 ECM should already make use of R-27R poorGood job from your part. Also could you notify please that the Su-27/33 have two greats ECM pods, good enough to weaken your "superior" Aim-7
Those missiles are no more special than any other missiles. The are designed to perform a function. So are other missiles.Here is your mistake, specialy when you are a moderator here and we are the customers saying our opinions with complet right. Obiosly you misunderstand me and I am not glorifying military hardware of my side using the same affirmation of you: " is electronically superior ".
I just like clarify that the missile has sufficient aerodynamic design to support the performance should have and we do not see it in our game, with simulator level category.
-
I Agree.
I disagree, AIM-120C should be better and also R77.
Where do you want to reach to be happy??
120c=75%PK R77=75%PK?
120c=75%PK R77=50%PK?
120c=75%PK R77=25%PK?
Do you have something else you agree or disagree?? just to know.
The only new negative feature have the new AIM-120 is he lose speed when maneuvering, even the AIM-7M in this 1.2.2 version is better than the R-27R. Really disappointing, when the R-27R have better performance and superior speed.
The only thing should do the F-15 against a RU missile is dispence 3 or 4 times chaffs and solved the problem. unbelievable!! does not matter the altitud to launch the R-27, he lose the track and speed easyly.
The R-27R and ER have a special aerodynamic design to support the heavy weigh missile and also have bigs wings to performs the real capability of the missile.
I am curious and waiting the next patch...
-
1
-
-
Here the Tacview. No comments...
Somebody can say me some Tipps to find my fit, no way with the new russians missiles!! :cry:
Why the Su-25T feels more sluggish than the A-10C
in DCS World 1.x (read only)
Posted
When I say liars, and please read again. I have never mention US pilots because in the yugoslavian operation were other imperialist nations. By the way how come that you being a moderator come into disagree with us and sometimes you could use offensives word, mostly against the russian hardware.
Is not the first time I got you arguing with the users of this forum.
What kind of moderator are you that you believe you have the rights to decide which hardware of our games is better and the best you can do is avoid the confrontation with the ED customers???????