cool_t

Naaa...Im more about the Force :)

Remember missiles can pull massive G's but.....when a missile is going Mach 2.ect ect...it can only navigate a specific realm in which, thrust-drag-intercept points are limited by thrust-drag-intercept points. Where a slower jet can produce more coverage of an average intercept point where the Missile wants to just hit the target and get there as fast as possible.......

Sorry...As soon as the missile comes of the rail the Missile can be deadly for "X" amount of time; loosing power. Remember the shortest distance between 2 points is a straight line....

Well stated :)

What did you like or dislike about F-C 1....????

LOL.......Remember as soon as the Missile comes of the rail/SAM-Site---Its loosing power, where "Some" jets have potential power, FUEL. ET/1/3rd.... OMG

Lol.......I must really be scary then.....I mean think about it...Muuuhahahahaah...

Right.....but there is a "True" advantage...where Migs/Su have almost "Real time" data link........

Just retain a balance between your indications "RWR"s and your intuition...........Good pilots can 4 C the future and predict many out-comes in battle... :)

Stay on TOPIC people.......... F-C-1.0....and F-C-2.0........ What was and what is 2 B.......... 4,000....Plus hits on thread.......VOTE and Put in your THOUGHTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The AWAX...."Non-Real-Time" updates in the F-15c has been a corner stone for Mig/Su pilots...Many people have been addressing that the F-15c does "NOT" have a data link and I have stated many times about "How much time it takes AWAX to give us real-time info on bandits in a flowing battle field" In a close knife fight a "real time" data link gives you the edge when you loose sight of the bandit, MIG/Su pilots have had the glory of "Real time" data links in the LOMAC series....where in my F-15c I had to improvise with my radar 2 sneak up on bandits with out being seen...AKA..."Ninja"

DCS? we will wait. As far as lomac- and ED-crunching scripts and numbers for flight physics, thats there "Business Plan" 2 update, release, and market the information and/or "Game-updates" as seen fit for the development and "Life span" of LOAMC series. As far as F-C- 2.0 for us people who dont test the product or know what has been changed we will wait and hope for the best; we just hope that as consumers that ED- has made the proper "Business Plan" move 2 satisfy there consumer base in this update. If one is going to sell and advertise apples that taste like carrots a firms consumer base will move to a firm that sells a product that satisfies ones needs. F-C-1.0 was cool we had good times but we also learned allot about supply and demand in a "Global Market" it does not matter how large or small a firm is or how many products one sells; proper goods and services will make or break any firm in a competitive consumer based product industry. Collective knowledge from ones consumer base also can define development of a firms product "How well a firm provides goods and services" to its consumers. If one goes 2 a place 2 eat and they have repeated good service they will return....... I truly hope that F-C 2.0 has at least addressed many of the "Holes" in F-C 1.0 F-C 2.0 from the sounds of it and at least hearing that the ET missile has been addressed should have many pilots thinking about there next move, in my eyes this will drastically change the battle field in Hyper-Lobby.....

SAM Launch....Know your maps and SAM Sites....Same moves...

So..... With the ET...at 1/3rd and ER tweaked...Even if the F-15c stays the same I will see a 12 to 1 Kill ratio in my F-15c....With my "Ninja Moves" ohhh sorry secret ninja moves.... All in all the F-15c is the premier fighter in LOMAC..with its feathers trimmed...

SAR-AR-Missiles BVR-Launch--Take the Missile for a ride head on do some low G turns then snap hard into a good launch pattern....Remember once the bandits missile come off the rail it is loosing power, depending on when you react and make it move for intercept points. Med-Range launch--Cork screw then jink...look for smoke and vapor-chaff---and then pull up once then pull up hard--chaff.. Knife-fight-launch-- Chaff, pull hard-gs...and rudder into bandits 6 for the kill IR-Launch BVR--Just assume that there is an ET coming your way and set up for your next attack. Med-Range launch--Look for smoke plume and assume there is an ET on the way...Flare..Flare..Flare..Flare.. set up for a kill run.. Knife-fight Launch....Flare Flare Flare...then pull hard...Rudder into bandits 6 for the kill...

Did they get hacked?????

K.....Understandable... Well in your wisdom G.G.....How do you feel about 2.0 so far? Compared 2 F-C-1.0 ect.ect???

I got and Email from LADY-ADMIN...stating that your server/P.C. detected a Virus on my P.C. Today...I got message...I have not benn on 3rd squad server in weeks if not months....LOCK on is not even on my P.C. right now... ???

Right..... My purpose here is only 2 understand if ED...has heard "Our" ----"Wish-List"... As far as "Whats out there" GG...we dont need to go into who knows what about what.... As far as this sim...I wont Fly anything else...period.. I guess Im just lost in the fact that the SU-27. cant use R-77s?? in this updated version? I know it sounds like Im in left field because im a die hard F-15c driver but if the 27-gets no upgrade or the mig...whats the use?? As far as the EAGLE is concerned well time will tell... P.S. PROBING.....Muuuhahahaha,......Muuuhahahahaaaa

Right...LOMAC-FC-Config...which are far from real life. So being that this is a simulation why cant the SU-27 carry R-77s? or "Represent" variants of the SU-27 family? In most cases its just a hard-point and soft-wear upgrade...simple ans effective on a good platform.

Right....LOMAC-FC-Configuration all jets........... It will be interesting....Im just taking a break from LOMAC for a while. P.S. http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/su-27/su-27_weapons.htm

Oh...Not the case at all...Yes I do hope the EAGLE gets some of its feathers back in the right places, indeed. Also I am assuming the SU-27 will carry the R-77 which would be "Up to date" and also good for SU-Pilots, the Su-27 has a nice fuel load/air/ground configuration. It would be nice 2 C the Su-27 with R-77s...More of a challenge in my eyes. Going up against the Su-27 in F-C 1.0 was a game of Cat-n-mouse, I always assumed there was an ET-launch from 10-15 nm. therefor I engaged accordingly (Many good SU-Pilots out there). The Mig-29....well Fuel was very very small, radar was way of the charts and it was better in close/med range engagements. a large percentage of my kills we Mig-29s. The Mig-29, in F-C-1.0 was a bit over kill with its power-plant compared to the F-15c where in reality we all know specific power-plant details. The SU-33...Seemed a bit sluggish in its power-plant as well. It had a great fuel load and weapons load but all in all not a good platform in a target rich battle field...you need a good wing man to be effective against multiple targets in the SU-33. The F-15c in F-C 1.0 configuration in my opinion is the premier fighter platform in the LOMAC series. With its massive fuel load, TWS, weapons load, and SA-tools its is the most deadly air-craft in the right hands. Many times I have intercepted A-50s far behind enemy lines and made it home (Also got shot down) but the mission capability of the F-15c goes far beyond any fighter in the LOMAC series, in the right hands. The A-10 is very fun, as with the Su-25s' I just hope that at least the AIM-120 is not a dud and the AIM-9 does not perform like a bottle rocket.

Well in that case some Air-Craft will be able to use there "Stand-Off" performance as intended when they were created. In LOMAC- B 4 F-C- The F-15c was more of a "Stand off" Air-Craft platform, where T-W-S-Kills in one flight were very common. When F-C-1.0.. was implemented the Eagle turned into a rather sluggish, single intercept Air-Craft where T-W-S kills in one flight were VERY RARE/ TWS-engagements in F-C-1.0.. were more of a way to push bandits away from a specific bandit that I would target for the kill/Due to missile "Tweaking" ect ect ect... So with "Some" missile "Tweaks" in 2.0 perhaps the T-W-S-Multiple engagement success envelope will become more deadly for pilots that can manipulate multiple targets into a kill zone. ;) Flight physics for Air-Craft platforms---The Eagle has a very very distinct power-plant performance as do migs/Su's....and going up against many great pilots in Migs/Su's I had to "Tweak" my moves according to my Eagles Power-Plant and the load on the jet..where in 2.0 shall the Eagle live up 2 its "Known" power-plant performance? As well as the Su-Migs? Looking back at F-C- and the LOMAC development I hope 2 C the Eagle in 2.0 soar to an aloft perch, high above the battle field, ready to scream down with fear and deception only to return to its nest to rest.... Muuuuhahahahahahaha.......Muuuuhahahahahahaaaaa!!! P.S. RELEASE DATE?????

Sweet......Well with the post from "Wags" introducing FC-2.0 I will come 2 the verdict that the F-15c will live up to its reputation, or at least NOT represent a shadow of the F-15c's concept and purpose. "eg" Power-plant, radar-IFF, Weapons-Gun sight/Missile-physics; also the same with other air-craft as well; radar platforms-power-plants-weapons-ect ect. I think there was a post way way way back about F-C-F-15c Flight envelope compared to the "Real" flight envelope of the F-15c...One thing wrong about the comparison was the "Time" it took to get up to specific altitudes/Speeds..F-C- was WAY off... Still all in all...cant wait..

Well, Remember that F-C...Is just a simulation. With all of our collective knowledge we all formed many opinions about all the air-craft-weapons-radar-ect...ect... With the "New" F-C- 2.0 perhaps all that was "Left out" of the air-craft Mig-Su/F-15..ect..ect will be implemented or refined as best as it can be. Such will be proven when the game is in our hands....cant wait ;)