Ragnarok

find to youtube "F-16 dodging 6 Iraqi SAM launches on Jan 19 1991" time 5:20 somethin like barrel roll I think. speed in this moment 170 from 420

unfortunately still waiting for some answers from my sources, but I think it would be best to in "look up 3-9 aspect" SARH embark on weeds with barrel-roll and large progressive reduction speed like in "my exploit". I hope to have clear answers soon...

When I think about it, in the long term, it is much more enjoyable to play against an opponent which is much easier. In fact, I would say a big exam. Never so much killing as Eagle, but the task worthy of the best pilots. How to outsmart someone who is much easier. Who knows, maybe this is not bad for Flanker drivers. Should only be released expectations from the "past life". OK, I'm at peace with destiny. :smilewink: back to training :thumbup:

You're absolutely right

in sustained turn, horisontal, more than 700km/h, eagle must be a little stronger in TRT than flanker, 20deg/s (n=7-8,5G). low altitude. Now in DCS, it is not so...

again, not the point that is better or more realistic plane. Already gradation between pilots, complex approach (like RL) vs. simple effective approach "ekploit". If the dominant this first I love this game. If this is second dominant for fight, I do not like... I believe you, too. only if not childish to forget this game as soon as you get out another game, even simpler. not the point in AIM, R-27, chaff-flare, visual possibility, east-west conflict, nothing... just approach problems the interesting of resolving the complexity of variables. I do not like simplicity! I want more variables that we must take care!!! Only one concern, one solution, that is "exploit". Exploit is not cheat of course.

I will find you on the server, and I'll explain you in first hand :D and do not tell me "good kill", It is so boring... :D

for defansive task, yes. For offensive intentions, NO! people, not the point that is better or more realistic plane. Already gradation between pilots, complex approach (like RL) vs. simple effective approach "ekploit". If the dominant this first I love this game. If this is second dominant for fight, I do not like... I believe you, too. only if not childish to forget this game as soon as you get out another game, even simpler. not the point in AIM, R-27, east-west conflict, nothing... just approach problems the interesting of resolving the complexity of variables. I do not like simplicity!

ok then, from now on I'm flying only F-15C. And all Flanker pilots also. No problem, the eagle is better, flanker is realistic trash, all flying only F-15. Except masochist :D I'm kidding of course, I am consistent person, though I like both planes... but more Flanker :)

Tell me why anyone would have a complex philosophy of struggle, because it can always be easy to fight in this way. I am first in selection, for example.

do you want more exploit in different sutuation? Gave me situation! different aspect, different range, anything else... no radar, just faking it an easy target and attack with AIM-120 in 3nm :D. Easy, very easy... :D ... or am I just talented "exploiter" :D

ok, guys, thanks, but explain to me everything what with which I am familiar years earlier. task for you: two ACMI, how would you resolve this if you have a skin Su-27? you go in silence, watching RWR, watching visual, I'm looking for smoke. When your enemy shoot, doing this exploit and visually reveal a target on the trail of smoke. do not use radar, afraid you'll have 27, he will flee. Play the easy target, leave him the initiative. You have exploit in every situation. And bum... Last night I tested in 104th., six kills this way. It's funny ... zoom in and you see how Su 27 wriggling. Edit: next time I will record "visual finding to missile" from my cockpit. Its easy. exploit for F-15.rar

ok, it may be best to record "exploit", and you to find the solution. your proposition is a multi move fight. Exploit is single move solution for every situation. what I have seen, is that the enemy's large zoom, is used for visual monitoring of over 20 km, no big worries for missiles that goes to him. I will give you track file or ACMI, and you find a solution for "exploit".

I have a suggestion for servers that are very popular. Who was dead, that receives ban for one day. This would have reduced the use of exploit, and many would have acted as the RL. Although a better indicator was when the player goes dead graphics card when is dead :D everyone would behave like real pilots, and ED would not have the trouble of simulates realistic avionics and physics :thumbup:

Then it is really sad. Races in "exploit" more important than tactics and planning. It all boils down to one move. I noticed that a lot of players who base their game on the opponent's missile detection visually, and then attack, not running away. I'm alive until I not launch a missile. Immediately after my launch, discover me visual, and I'm dead. Absolutely nobody escape, no matter what type of missiles. I think I'm paying the consequences because I don't think like "gaming way" , but the like RL pilot. I must to change complete reorganization of views DCS fight.

No one escapes in front of the Russian aircraft. Fired missiles only shows my position, nothing more. R-73 not work. Eagle just push 11G and 73 misses. Has never been this exploitation in such a quantity. Each skill is neutralized with exploit. There is no situation from which I have not missed. DCS fighters = Eagles fight

never lived anything like. it's just a theory. There are many problems. exactly

MiG-31 can do it. But... complex conditions require long time corrections. For example, in the description for AIM-120 it is clearly stated it can be launched with Eagle platform, and that the guiding with E-3! But in RL, USAF tried once or twice a long time ago, always unsuccessful. No longer spending money on testing. I do not know in the near future... ...theoretically possible, but practically hard to do or nonsensical. either case, it comes to the inertial guidance, easier than SARH but it's a big mistake correction also.

does anyone know why there were many failures and R-27R? my source: - on the side of Ethiopia were some Russian pilots, who are more trained Ethiopian pilots but than were fighting. In the beginning of the war, Ethiopian pilots behaved in that the fired rockets from a large distance, and with the first rapprochement interrupted lock. My source said that the Russian instructor insisted on that it must be approached much closer and not to leave the offensive to end. On the same day was shot down mig with missile R-27R. The other victory with R-73 was later. Sounds simple, but there it was. Between brave pilots who are may there come closer, she was a woman pilot :) I'm ready to tell my source, but only PM. I have proof :)

omg lol I opened a forum page just to write exactly that. Yesterday I flew at 104th. and I've seen several times in a row, opponent flying about 400 km / h, I fire him, he does not run. I killed him with gun :D people, I think that the biggest hassle for developers for the right, how to coordinate constantly behavior skills from AI and new small correction for guidance SARH. Apparently, while we debate the probability of impact, the problem is programmed an adequate anti-missile maneuver for AI. I mean, I do not know... :(

only axis you must in dcs settings. it is easier

lol profiler for logitech 940 is perfect. import my profil, go in "options" global settings, aaply persistent profile in list "name g940f15"

:thumbup: g940f15.rar

your reply like "update to hopes"

Hey guys, just to say hello ... and I see that the battle moved on forum from multiplayer server who yawning empty, but very very hotly forum. Very interesting... I think it's a problem with the Chaff and R-27. I, for now, chill out 'just like developers ED :juggle: