-
Posts
2257 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
About Mainstay
- Birthday 01/08/1979
Personal Information
-
Flight Simulators
DCS, IL-2 BOX, IL-2 CLOD, Rise of Flight and BMS
-
Location
Чистое Небо
-
Interests
Siamese cats, Scale models and Aviation history
-
Occupation
Business IT Liaison
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
I have the same issue... My cursor was causing extreme lag ingame and when i stopped touching my mouse and the cursor disappeared everything is fine. My report rate was set to 1000 from the range i have (1000/500/250/125), only after setting it to 125 DCS didnt start to flip out and had massive stutters and FPS drops. Why cant DCS handle the higher report rates of the mouse? Mine is a Logitech G203 and i had this mouse for ages so its not the mouse (i used multiple of the same model)... Besides DCS seems to be the only problem and i only had this since last 2 patches.
-
I would like this option as well. Indeed make it work with radar on and launch warning and that would be awsome!
-
Exactly… either you do all the modules at once to create an honest battleground or just make it equal until you actually can. But this is just absurd.
-
So will we see an improved version of the RWR system with launch detection and working continues instead of the “thing” we have now? Realism is nice but since this is a sim it should be balanced as well. I for one are really frustrated with the fact I don’t know when being fired at… don’t get proper warnings all the time while we have a whole fleet of modules that have a balanced suite of RWR systems unlike the real thing…. It just doesn’t make sense to put a brilliant module like the fulcrum in the DCS skies with such a weird choice of handicapping.
-
Well real or not for me your modded versions work better in VR when it comes to readability. And besides it’s a sim and not a real aircraft.
-
-
Oh if you could share it the MiG work that would be awsome m8! And thnx for the work you have done so far for other modules ED should take a look at your mod and implement it for VR users in my opinion
-
This is a mod for the F-18 HUD. Thats one example of a HUD that’s way sharper and better for VR usage. The lines ED uses are way too thick and blurred for higher resolution and VR. Same with F-16 / AH-64 and now MiG-29…. Just try switching to night HUD on the Fulcrum and it looks way sharper and less blown up and fuzzy… credits to mod maker https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3328256/
-
I dont know if any other VR users are experiencing the same issues as me. But i have to use mods for a lot of modules (F-18/F-16/AH-64/AV-8) in DCS to tone down the fuzziness and thickness to make it enjoyable. Now the MiG-29 is the same problem all over again..... Night time mode the fuzziness and thickness of the displayed symbology and lines is perfect in VR. Why cant it be the same for the daytime mode HUDS for all these aircraft? Its kinda weird that we have this problem for years now over multiple modules and people need to mod it while it has been requested many times. Make a slider or something for users to adjust for VR maybe? Anyways if anyone knows where i can find the files for the MiG-29 to adjust the DAYTIME HUD Symbology fuzziness and thickness im grateful. I checked multiple folders and i cant find the .Lua with the right lines to adjust them to get things right. Thanks in advance
-
Will the F1M see the Exocet missile? Grabbed this from wik In October 1996, Thomson-CSF was awarded a FFr700 million (US$96m) contract to upgrade 48 F1C/E single-seaters and 4 F1EDA trainers to Mirage F1M standard (see below). Ex-Qatar Mirage F1s were left outside the upgrade, as it was a different version, and were the first ones to be retired.[88] As well as a service-life extension, this improved the avionics and added anti-shipping capability with a modernised Cyrano IVM radar and Exocet compatibility. It seems the M's had anti ship capabilities
-
Why would i wanna press on the line.... doesnt make sense at all
-
ED, we need help as modules have been abandoned by Polychop
Mainstay replied to peeter's topic in Polychop-Simulations
Well aint that something... so whos gonna do developing for these modules now? ED? Whats the plan.... -
@Eagle Dynamics So what is going on?
-
+1 support the extra fuel modification on the wings