X-man

Göteborg Aero Show till helgen, någon som ska gå?

That doesn't stop us from being the best of the best though! :D Actually, I started of with MSFS98, but LOMAC was my first militarty...

I started with LOMAC :baby:

no, no, no...It's jävla h**a. Dont forget the dots. Now, run along :P

I know... :thumbup: :D :lol:

Where's the Im only tired of stupid, meaningless polls...

About time this poll came up :D

:lol: Comrade Cosmo, good one :D

The aircraft, McDonnell Douglas MD-82, is a T-tail aircraft. T-tails have poorer stall characteristics than aircraft with conventional tails/stabalizors and wing mounted engines. http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1358541/L/ Given the fact that the explosion happend very short after takeoff, the time during flight where the alpha is the highest, the loss of one engine would have incresed that alpha and gone into a stall which, with the little altitude, could have been unrecoverable. This is just my speculation though. Another spectulation; Could the hydrulics been damaged by explosion/fire and cuased the plane to bank right :huh: Whatever the cuase, may they RIP... :cry:

Here's mine right now. :music_whistling:

Happy Birthday m8! :)

Notice, it's the 159th withdrawing :P

Russia withdrawing from Poland. Very nice pics! :) http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia---Air/Sukhoi-Su-27/1051180/L/ http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia---Air/Sukhoi-Su-27/1325749/L/ http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia---Air/Sukhoi-Su-27UB/1043510/L/ On the matter of a/c ratios. Even though the ratio might have been 7:8:2, no one would ever deploy just 2 aircraft to a battlefield. Naturally you'd deploy a squadron or not. So the ratio argument is a bit flawed. Now, we're not flying IRL and I understand for balancing purposes it works really well with the ratio :) Keep up the good work RvE :D

I ahve, actually flew F-15 on this particular server the other day...Nice try :thumbup: You implied that the AIM-7 was usless :P You're providing your point of view, Im providing my and everyone else theirs. In the end, it's RvE that decides the rules and mission...

No, but it's still SARH, and notching (breaking lock) should actually be even easier at longrange. I fail to see why AIM-7 is useless BVR...

Ive flown Su-27 with SARH for 3+ years...This hasnt prevented me from getting BVR kills with them. One thing is to say how to defeat them and one thing is to do it 10/10 times. And from what Ive seen, notching also kills actives...

I wouldnt know, havent seen the real one... Who give's a **** when your entering the actual engagement. Be it 300km or 50 km from homeplate...The fuel still matters and so does the missiles and radar. Amen ;)

So you wouldnt consider 4 Semi-actives vs 2 Semi-actives crippled? :lol: F-15 losses it's 120 and suddenly it's WVR arena??? lol @ RvE: Hope you dont get offended by my argumentation. I know it's you server/missions, but Im simply expressing my point of view. Cheers :D

Well, if you put archers on F-15, they would be too good. You currently have 7 F-15C vs 8 MiG-29A and 2 Su-27. The MiGs are already crippled in terms of weapons (add to that 2 R-60), radar, fuel. And the 2 SUs arent really compensating for that disadvantage. If you even the only advantage the MiGs have...well you get what im trying to say. There's realistic and there's HL... :)

Good Job RvE and especially Yoda! :D S!

Jo visst, Stockholm är la fint, men Göteborg är ändå #1 :P :D

Maybe not my best creations, but these are the ones I have now... ;) Enjoy! :) Quick Start.rar

A silly mission I made long time ago :) A-10A_Belogorsk_Offensive.rar

Su-25T probably shouldn't be allowed. However, the Su-25A and all it's ordinance should...

1. R-27E series became operational in early 90's... 2. Tor, Avenger