Jump to content

Sukhoi25

Members
  • Posts

    327
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sukhoi25

  1. I think you need to go to the descriptions of the plane liveries located in bazar. But not sure. Sorry man, no ATM here at moment...:(
  2. Omg. This looks very 3rd party ;) (you know what i mean[emoji14]rofessional) Man, it's wonderful
  3. As far as i know coyote has not been selected for the USAF on the LAS because of 'buy american' rules. It has been judged that Sierra Nevada which offerted the A-29 (oneseater: without FLIR) is 'more american' that Hawker (GB) Beech (US) craft Raytheon (US) that offerted the AT-6C an extensive reworking of the PC-9M (CH). AT-6 has FLIR and A-29 no. AT-6 has a more powerful version of the PT6A engine and a lighter empty weight. It results in a better T/W ratio. T-6 is currently in service with more AFs including USAF, USN, Luftwaffe. But let's not start a debate please.
  4. I just discovered to have a big shit on my pC! Blender doesn't run. Expect delays... Sorry... :(:(
  5. Stratos! Be happy! AT-6C Coyote has better LGB ability than AT-29 (twoseater) and A-29 (oneseater) don't has it... So :thumbup::music_whistling: EDIT: Has anybody blueprint for the T-6A texan II? didnt found them. Instead using PC-9M
  6. Hello guys: small update. Some of you will get angry but i decided to swap the A-29 with the Beechcraft T-6 "Texan II" family. The why: i am Swiss and first the T-6 has wing easier to model, but the much bigger why is that i have a good platform near to house: the Pilatus PC-7MkII. The T-6 was developed from Pilatus PC-9M which is (dimensions) exactly the same of the PC-7MkII, so in SFM and animations it's a good start point. The T-6 has a very powerful COIN version which it's the AT-6C bought by Iraqi Air Force which is much better than the Tucano. The cockpit is similar (I don't wanna travel to Brazil every time to take a good look at it) and uses US weapons so no need to model new weapons like Python-3 from Israel of Tucano. Hope to can post progresses and that you will like them in anycase :music_whistling:
  7. I too would like this :) Some idea, could you post the standard DCS UKR Mi-8 skin?
  8. Ah right...But does a such "tool" not work?
  9. Try to copy Usaf_stencils from F-15 and VVS_stencils from Su-25T. Then definite it with the description.lua on the liveries
  10. Nice mod joey. I'll got it ;) Good idea!
  11. Thank you very much! Any chance USAs [emoji631] or WITHOUT Combined arms?
  12. Thank you very much! Any chance USAs [emoji631] or WITHOUT Combined arms?
  13. Old of A-10A should be 16 if ain't go wrong and Su-25t is nil [emoji6] Somthing like: {self_ID,'A10A',old = 16}, current_mod_path..'/Comm/Hawk.lua' ? Or Somthing like: {self_ID,'Hawk',old = 16}, current_mod_path..'/Comm/Hawk.lua' ? But i am not sure...
  14. Hello guys, i wanted to ask you if is possible to use the infantry as drivable: like use it with CA, or like an ejected pilot-in this case if we would press C use e.g. the M4, with a HUD to shoot... Or will DCSW 1.5/2.0 give us this possibility? [emoji4]
  15. Zei has made one: russian forum. DONATE Required to obtain
  16. Thank you:):)! A thing to note is that probably it will be a mod. (SU-25T or A-10A Hud) The reason of it is because ED releases C++ DLLs to developers that prove they have already knowledges in programming, but i haven't these, so on subsequence, if one day it will be finish it will be mod.
  17. Hello RedBeard could you tell us where exactly (which path and file) is located the SFM? I would tune it for an own plane. Thank you:p!
  18. ;) First two point should be easy, the third is a little more difficult, but probably i need a tester for this mod when it will be ready! No worries, because i will surely get back to you.
  19. Anyways, like i remarked so many times i am not a good modeler, so i am very satisfied with it. ;) What goes on, next things to do: -correct wing -sharpen up fuselage -start cockpit -give an in-game try with very basical settings :)
  20. Hello Stratos. Sad :( it doesn't look real! :D I am joking a little bit. Anyways: I think it's because the camera for the render's positioned in a strange way, so it might disturb proportions!
×
×
  • Create New...