Jump to content

Wizard_03

Members
  • Posts

    1637
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wizard_03

  1. Many of us have a huge interest in carrier ops. Including our friends that play online.
  2. I don’t feel the same way. I don’t buy things based on other people’s decisions, if I want it and they don’t then; tough I don’t get to play with them anymore.
  3. Like MAC? Bottom line for me is I want the new carrier comms whatever it takes to get them in the game.
  4. Or they could not make it free to play and charge for the base game.
  5. Because them and I want a more realistic sim. These modules have a huge “upkeep cost” they take years to release and sometimes even longer to complete
  6. So make everything more expensive? That won’t work because people in this thread are already saying they can’t afford the carrier module.
  7. What the alternative? ED creating some sort of subscription program where we all pay for everything all the time. The way they have it now, you have the freedom to chose what you’d like to support, by voting with your money.
  8. Everyone does not have to buy it. But if you want the full hornet/tomcat experience why wouldn’t you? That’s what I don’t understand. I get the feeling not everyone is interested in hyper realism all the time. But that’s why we have server menus. They are not taking anything away from what we have now. Those that won’t buy it for whatever reason don’t have too. They can still play online just not with the new carrier
  9. Because the hornet is most popular module in the game and carrier ops are a huge part of that experience.
  10. I’ll concede that, but making it free is not the answer either.
  11. The 70 percent can still play the game on their own servers without the carrier
  12. How are they going to lose money by charging for their work?!?
  13. That’s fine, just don’t complain that you can’t join people’s servers who did buy it. I’m quite sure the group of people like yourself who don’t want it will create their own servers without it.
  14. It’s not going to divide the community if we all buy it. You already spent 70 bucks on the hornet 60 for the PG map. Why would you do that and NOT buy the carrier?!? Lol
  15. Really? Cause people said the exact same things when ED dared to charge for WW2 assets..
  16. It’s not elitist, it’s a fact DCS expensive. Rightfully so
  17. No you said my argument is invalid I’m challenging you to present yours.
  18. So how can they improve the game without money?
  19. So You don’t think ED deserves compensation for their work?
  20. It is fair, I spent well over a thousand US dollars on DCS software and the necessary hardware set up. If you can’t afford it please find a new game, No hard feelings. But anyone who plays DCS seriously is going to buy the module and completely understand why they’ve got to pay for it. When MAC comes out, it will allow causal players an alternative.
  21. Flight simming is not a cheap hobby... Stop complaining about having to pay for EDs craftsmanship. This is not some massive Development company trying to suck money out of us, this a small group of enthusiasts building the best product possible in a tiny market. It’s going to cost money to keep them working for us. If you can’t afford it, find a new hobby. :)
  22. That's why the AIM-54 is not really needed anymore.. In fact, aircraft like the F-15/22 can hurl the spears even further...speed and altitude are very important in BVR.
  23. So its probably better to have something heavy on the tips then not, to cut down on that.
×
×
  • Create New...