Jump to content

AlexCaboose

Members
  • Posts

    251
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AlexCaboose

  1. It'd be really great if we had the ability to preconfigure a bunch of additional settings in the Mission Editor for our jets.

    • TACAN Channel/Band/Mode
    • JHMCS On/Off (Or even a brightness slider for it in %)
    • Radar modes/settings
    • MFD pages
    • Etc.

    I realize that some of this would be covered by a DTC tool, but some of it wouldn't. I've built an air start mission for BFM Perch setups, but having to get everyone to setup their jets every time still delays getting into position to begin.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  2. 2 hours ago, BaronVonVaderham said:

    I’m contemplating this one over the  WW version. Mostly because I saw YT reviews of the WW version that was negative about the deadzone and how that affects the fssb functionality. I have a non fssb WW stick which is great, but I do have issues with the deadzone. 
     

    I’m contemplating which stick to go for though. Should I go for the basic stick, or the ce/as version at twice the expense? I have no need for direct memory slots to be honest. 
     

    also, none of them are in stock. Any clue when they will be available again?

    They should be back in stock at the end of the month. No need to buy the CE/AS unless you want to mount the grip to another (non-RS base).

    I'd buy once, cry once. The RS is the better product vs WW.

    • Like 2
  3. The current implementation is wrong anyway. EO and IR shouldn’t have the same level of zoom to the best of my knowledge given they’re different sensors with different capabilities.

     

     The implantation should be whatever is most correct, whether or not it adds or removes features. It’s a simulator and should reflect an accurate simulation of the capabilities.

    • Like 4
  4. On 3/4/2023 at 8:18 AM, darkman222 said:

    So what youre saying, or more or less confirming is, that RS got it right, or at least at right as you can get the behavior and movement of the real F16 stick with a FFB replica. Correct?

    Yes, although it is not FFB. Force Feedback uses a motor to provide resistance or hold the stick in a given location. This is force sensing. Similar sounding name, but very different.

     

    On 3/4/2023 at 10:19 AM, Mr_sukebe said:

    My apologies, but I can't bring myself to read or watch any thread of video that includes the statement "this changes everything".  After all, my dog still looks the same to me.

    Please don't encourage others to continue to abuse the English language in this way.

    It’s a significant departure from a typical center or side stick with a gimbal. Seems like you’re being deliberately obtuse about his meaning. 

     

  5. On 2/28/2023 at 9:03 AM, feipan said:

    But radar range is not saved, so this is a bit moot

    Range is saved, that was fixed.

    4 hours ago, S said:

    What do you mean by this? TWS vs RWS?

    Range is easy enough to change with either the push buttons on the display or (even easier) the pipper (up to extend, down to contract, left/right to change azimuth).

    Never use TWS.

    Range is a good one, but it can also be your cursor correlation range and altitude settings and whatnot that get adjusted. Saves time on a recommit into a short skate or banzai.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...