Saigon

+1

Good morning. Can the ED add the commands menù for wingman 4. Currently there is only wingman 2 and wingman 3. The command would also be useful: "engage ship"

COMPLETELY AGREE:thumbup:

Yes . I have observed them closely and we note that they are not on the same axis. One is more forward than the other. I seemed to understand by reading that the thing was intentionally affixed to some Russian aircraft but I'm not sure if I understood correctly because I often use the translator and sometimes I struggle:blush:. Thanks again.

Hello. I would like to ask you why there are these differences in proportions between the internal view and the external view? From the internal view everything is further away than the external view. I try to put some pictures to explain myself better. Thanks bye

as for the bombardment, I am trying the manual function by setting an angle of between 35/40 degrees 2 km distance, which allows me to see the pipper. with an angle of 15/20 starting from 2000 meters it is surely easier to recover by avoiding to overcome the G and lose the load but it is not possible to have an effective target lock. Even the cannon pods or the 32 rockets are released from the 1e2 pylons if you make abrupt maneuvers. I definitely need more practice but I used this aircraft exclusively for a long time in the past and now I'm flying it again, but most of the time I lose the charged by internal pylons on the first pass on the target.:doh::megalol::thumbup:

Ah ok, I didn't know. Thanks for the clarification.

Hi everyone, me again. During an attack on the ground I carry the plane with an angle between 30 and 40 very close to the target, at a speed of around 600 km. I often have to interrupt the attack, recover the plane and resume the climb abruptly to avoid crashing to the ground or exposing myself too much to air defenses. So most of the time I lose the load from the pylons. I understand that the bombardment requires a lot of practice but, thanks to ASP, the difficulty in maneuvering the aircraft and the G factor for the attachment of the pylons, I find that the loss of the load is a little frustrating. I understand that it's probably realistic but maybe having an option on the menu to avoid losing the load from the pylons would be a good thing for me, and for you?:blush:

The landing lights but above all the taxi lights point to the left, they are not centered. it's normal?

Hello. no they were not wrong, there was simply no update in this patch for the mig-21. we will have to wait for the next one.

Resolved. I have now read a post by Hiromachi. no update for the mig in this patch. we will wait for the next one.

Hello I updated dcs to the latest stable version available: 2.5.4.30386 but I don't see any differences in MIG-21 compared to the changelog. For example SOD mode Knob rotation Range and White flood light knob rotation are like before updating. I also did a repair, but nothing. I don't use any Mods. Have you noticed the changes mentioned in the list? Thank you,Bye.

ok thanks a lot for the clarifications. pity because they were better before but rightly so.Bye bye:thumbup:

Thanks for the reply Red Yeti. I'll do tests tomorrow because I can't now. However I don't know if it will work, I'm looking for a way to get an example: Key "C" (Joy Button 1) for "AirBrake ON" and Key "B" (Joy Button 2) for AirBrake OFF. As in the M2000c or in the F-18. Thanks anyway

I'm looking for a way to get the speed brake on off on separate commands. I tried the code strings you posted, I also changed them, but without success. Does anyone know how to do ? thank you

Hi everyone. I noticed a decrease in performance regarding the duration of the combustion and speed of the R-3R, R-3S, R-13M / M1 missiles, I also noticed that the R-3R hardly hit the target even though it is blocked and centered in the radar for the entire duration of the launch. I have read posts about it but I cannot understand if this is correct or not. Maybe I'm wrong ...? Are they working on this or are they so correct? Thank you.

yes, maybe for some it may seem of little use, but this function would give a big change to the simulator bringing it to a higher level of simulation. on xplane I always used it and the same flight the same route or mission every day becomes different.

I hope they introduce real weather option in a short future. would give the simulator an additional realism and dynamism.

Hi everyone I remember that when the MIG-21 came out many commands had the ON-OFF function separat as for example the air brakes. it is possible in the future to have this option again in addition to the already existing one ??. Thank you.

Hi NakedSquirrel, yes, yesterday I did some quick tests with the ARU system putting it on manual with a maximum setting. As I said before, I was really surprised. it is as if it were a limiter of the angle of attack. It is thus possible to make tight and decisive turns without risking stalling with respect to the AUTO setting. Today I still try to see if it offers even greater pitch stability. I would like to have your feedback on the ARU system.

I just did a test now. I put the ARU system on manual and set it to high speed at maximum, it was amazing. I performed attack maneuvers with a high coefficient G and the angle of attack hardly reached 30 (red), thus avoiding stalling. Invitation to try it. Returning it to Auto the sensitivity increases excessively and with little you exceed the angle limit and you immediately enter a stall. At this point I think I will always use it on Manual and high speed settings.

Ok, thanks for the clarification. I was hoping instead that they were still working on the flight model including the stall. I find it very fluctuating. I remember that in the past they had developed better and more stable versions of FM, but I'm not a MIG pilot and this remains my opinion given by the feeling I have in flying it. In any case, I still love this plane. Thank you again, bye-bye.

Yes it is true, I agree with you. I am currently using MIG -21 with pleasure; but the flight model is not the maximum is very unstable and ASP is not correct. What I'd like to know is whether they're still working on fixing these problema or not. Thank you

Goodmorning everyone. I bought the Mig 21 in March 2015 and I have used only this aircraft for almost 2 years, so I haven't used it for another 2 years and now I have tried to reuse it again. I noticed personally and I read here on the forum that there are still problems with the flight model and ASP as well as other small bugs. What I'd like to know from those who are selling this product is if it's working to fix these problems. I really liked this aircraft when it came out, but over time I noticed that the problems generally got worse and this was the reason why I stopped using it. it would be a real shame not to assist him because it remains a fascinating product. Thank you,:bye_2:

+1. I was going to ask the same.