Kang
-
Posts
2346 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Kang
-
-
As far as I can tell both the tractors and the waypoint action have been put in for future use and there are no 'active' trailers as of yet. At least I haven't seen one.
-
The truth is that Wags has an assistant who moves the mouse very slowly and smoothly.
-
1
-
-
22 hours ago, Mike Force Team said:
The ZEL would great for the Germany map. It would fit in the scenario when the Cold War goes hot.
That would, after all, be the perfect time to get some flight tests done!
-
1
-
-
Last I heard it's not really like the German armed forces were overly happy with it either. Showing off might just be smiling for the pain.
-
1
-
-
I perfectly get that the amount of dev-time is limited and people want different things as, sadly, we simply cannot have it all. Still, as upyr1 pointed out: ED is working on the F-35A - which in turn I have very little interest in - and HB is working on a Eurofighter Typhoon.
-
1
-
-
I know it is, in all likelihood, being based on a Spanish example of the F-104G and that's perfectly fine, but do y'all see a chance for the incorporation of the AS.34 Kormoran anti-ship missile?
-
1
-
-
Since the 'No manual?' thread got merged and conveniently closed, I'll put the question here:
Is the manual being proof-read with surprising tenacity or is it - as said thread recently suggests - running into some trouble in the writing process?
-
1
-
-
Doubly so, in fact, if you fly a mission you haven't created yourself and in lieu of a good briefing have to guess at which radio channel preset is the one you need...
-
1
-
-
It definitely would be a good choice. As you said: the early models saw combat in WW2, it was rather prominent in the Korean War and the later variants saw some action in Vietnam and Africa.
You could say the rug really tied the room together.
-
1
-
-
Quite frankly, this is the wrong variant to be dogfighting F-14 Tomcats in
-
3
-
-
I would take that swap in an instant as well, but given how the F-35A is officially announced, I'd say it's a bit late for that now.
-
I'm fairly sure there is no more work being done on the BS2 version.
-
1
-
-
Having just muzzle flashes akin to the fire and smoke effects to be placed would be a great solution. Place them around buildings or in the forests.
-
10 hours ago, Vakarian said:
Yes, but that list only works for already placed units. What Kang wishes is in the dropdown where you actually select which unit to place to have a distinction so you don't have to jump between two windows. I certainly support this.
That's what I meant, yes.
I do not find it amusing when I spend time carefully placing things in a mission only to later find out that I can't share it people freely because at some point I used something form an asset pack. It isn't always obvious, and it's definitely going to get harder when there are more asset packs around.
-
1
-
-
Must be one hell of a manual if proofreading alone takes more than one and a half years.
-
2
-
-
21 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:
I’ve seen this wish several times before, but not once have I seen how do they propose to keep the company afloat during that year.Selling a lot of the modules that are actually released and would become a whole lot less annoying to use, I presume.
I know that probably doesn't work out, but it is no secret that the enormous backlog of errors is only getting bigger and bigger, and it sure hampers DCS' progress and in turn sales. Now, I'd say that ED isn't exactly a prime example of being geniuses at running a business either, but to be honest - they might have us morons figured out just right and manage to just scrape by despite the releases to - as you said - stay afloat during the year, coming ever quicker and - some people say - being less and less impressive.
-
2
-
-
Simple wish:
Mark units that require one or the other asset pack in the ME unit lists. Give them an asterisk or a "(Asset Pack)" or whatnot. Perhaps retroactively for units from the original asset pack as well?
-
1
-
-
Frankly, the whole reputation of the Starfighter in Germany was decidedly blown out of proportion by a contemporary media campaign and the concurrent bribery scandal. Once it had that reputation there was nothing to be done to change it again.
A lot of it had to do less with the F-104G or its mission profiles and more with the Luftwaffe itself.
-
3
-
-
Isn't the sight only one part of the system, though?
-
If it were only the mission creators...
No, seriously, I agree there are about three or four aircraft carriers worth of gross register tonnes of things that ended up 'on the backlog' for who knows how long. Literal bugs of things not working, plenty of issues of things kinda working but definitely not right and a plethora of things that weren't exactly cutting edge back then but are frankly hideous design choices today.
But I think we all know what ED's reply is going to be. 'It's complicated and takes time', 'We don't have time to work on it because there are so many other things that need doing' and the classic 'provide a track!'.
P.S.:
While I'm sure someone will kindly point out how I am not a software developer and thus have no idea about that, it isn't made better by the fact that a lot of these things (mind you definitely not all) are pretty much copy/paste jobs for an afternoon, which we know, because community members, past and present, have provided these fixes in mods previously.-
5
-
-
Either that or you position them accordingly, make good use of the setting that makes them fire only at a percentage of their max range, too.
-
They don't care for such and fire when they get the shot.
-
15 hours ago, Slice313 said:
I never made any complex mission, so ain't sure if that is even possible when you are making a campaign. Maybe waypoints are needed? This screen is from mission 6 or 7 of the Outpost Campaign.
Anyway, that would not be a solution but rather avoiding the problem.
I see. I thought it was a mission you made yourself. Can't really change it then.
13 hours ago, AeriaGloria said:It’s hands written! A pilot could write as small as they want!!!!
Well, to an extend. I doubt many Soviet pilots carried microfiche writing equipment with them.
13 hours ago, AeriaGloria said:Warthunder???? lol, if I was a pilot drawing on my map o surely wouldn’t write instructions for different legs on top of each other making it impossible to read!!!!!!!!!
That is definitely a point. If ED was to take care of this at all (I doubt they will) a very walkable way would be to just suppress the markings for legs that are too short.
-
1
-
-
Perhaps the easy solution is to just not have as many waypoints that closely together. In your example picture you seem to be following the coastline. Surely there is no need for 5 (?) major course corrections within a couple miles.
-
1
-
Help to understand why JTAC does not work ! (eternal issue)
in Mission Editor
Posted
Frankly what would be nice:
A little indication in the ME when setting up a unit to act as JTAC on what it is capable of or not.