Cisco

i setup one 4 the lulz. Here you can see how they work. In this example. The SRV records points to the A record "abuddyspike" and then the SRV record "buddyspike.kjeks.io" defines the port and protocol

Nope, its a type of DNS record.

DanielNL, if you use an SRV record you dont need the port. TS3 support SRV records :D

7 times out of 10, red wins every time!

Just did a bit of flying... Man the R27's are bad, like jesus.

Gadget website having problems or just me?

ED could buy anti cheat software, not sure if its really needed. There is like 100's of ways to get around this.

If you know how to code you can write a very simple hack to change memory so that you turn on labels for example. Coding a simple ESP would not be that hard either. Cheaters will cheat, hopefully the DCS community is mature enough to not have this happen.

T O P K E K @ users in this thread asking about BF having realism. Flying FC3 aircraft with M2000 on both sides. Listen, BF is not about realism its about teamwork. If you want realism play the fishbed vs mig or you always have VATSIM.

The 120C's have incorrect flight dynaics IIRC. If you fox 3 at long distance they dont try to save energy and when they are fired at a steep off bore angle at medium ideal range they loose alot of energy fast because the top priority for the missile is to get on target super fast instead of taking it slow.

No but really, would not mind having AIM-120's in. The B model for example.

Good flying today guys Shoutout to epic GCI by =RvE=SirScorpion

I have really only ever used the 120C's. How much does it differ from the 120B?

Yeah, im in. Hopefully we can get a furball going and then do some spamramming.

I want to make it very clear that i dont have any access to the server at all, and even tho i host the server for free i dont have any say in how it is run. :)

I would like to see everything enabled on both sides for everything. May the best pilot win regardless of airframe or wepons. Would also fix the issue that players choose blue because of F15 and vise versa. This har allready been done with viggen and m2000 so i dont see why mig-29, su-27, su-33 and f-15 cannot be included.

Yeah, if anyone is experiencing network issues (packetloss, ping issues, etc.) i would love to have a look at a traceroute.

I think all aircraft on both sides would make the balance better, i really like flying russian jets, but when the people i fly with want F-15's i have no choice. I would really like to have all wepons enabled too. Right now its kind of a boring BVR version, if players want dogfight we might as well make a F-5, Mig-21, Su-25 server.

Is there any way to turn off radio sound effect for SRS?

BUG REPORT: Su-33 starts with full loadout (ER and ET) on carrier. Have not played the red side yet on the but they either spawn there or they land there and then rearm. Until this is fixed i suggest removing the carrier on RU side, replacing it with destroyers or enabling all weapons for both sides.

TS can do all this and more.

Teamspeak > Simple Radio. Sorry bud.

The problem with DCS servers is that it require a GPU that supports DX11 or higher. So if you are running Xeons you ned v4 or newer, I7's (spesific chipsets) or a full GPU. You guys should see that hardware that Buddyspike runs on.

Viggen is not a SEAD aircraft. Everything the viggen can do the SU-25T and the A10C can do better. Exception might be ship defence but thats it.

Would much rather have su-33 vs viggen tbh. Viggen is not a very capable CAS aircraft either tbh. Yeah, sure, its fast but the way you can aqire targets with a su-25t or A10C is much better.