Blitz05

climb out to 80k feet and then burn to mach 5, active radar was initiated between 3-5 miles giving you about 4 seconds of reaction time give or take the target altitude. But who knows how they will model it in DCS with how poorly the amraam is modeled I am not going to hold my breath. I really just see it used as missile boat, launch all 4 and pray they hit. But maybe we will get an actual ocean map to accompany better carrier combat.

From what I am hearing is it works if you are running the open beta client but not the main

F10 radio menu is not functioning since latest update

So are all weapons supposed to be enabled now?

the one that uses the rafale displays

Proof or it never happened

The upgrade in 2015 was for the -5 and to make the glass cockpit NVG compatible. But the thread does have other interesting notes but most of them are no one really knows and that the french just didnt use them for interceptors.

the cockpit lights are red and of the same shade so there is minimal interference with NVG and other then the warning panel nothing causes light bloom which is acceptable for NVG qualification on an airframe. So by all standards there should be no reason why we cannot have night vision on the mirage.

Hey Greg any chance for bringing dynamic weather back again, starting to miss the night and bad weather missions

Night vision is something you clip to your helmet, the aircraft does not need any compatibility with night vision unless maybe you want uv lighting of which the mirage has ingame.

You are forgetting it is not RVE's fault that one team sways to blue or red, it comes down to more people own the a-10 then the ka-50 and the f-15 over the su-27. Also the tendency of people naturally choosing blue over red because blue is viewed as the good guys. To really help out the numbers on both sides put the attack aircraft on both teams and just leave the fighters east vs west.

That would involve the people who say it needs to be mandatory to actually use it instead of being on teamspeak and not having the application even running.

so give blue the ka-50 and red the a-10

What about limiting the 4th gen aircraft to 2 lives and have the 3rd gen set at 4? Also with how easily a single or pair of strikers can decimate a base could there possibly be a way to add them to both sides to promote more helicopter assaults? I feel it would both allow each sides players to even themselves out rather then having specific attack airframe dictate what side they join. Of course leave the fighters where they are to add more of the east vs west feeling. I feel trying to promote more of the ground attack aspect and logistical runs would allow blueflag to pull away from airquake style gameplay where most players just want to do cap and instead want them to escort strikers.

http://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_old_pdf.cfm?ARC_ID=1066 http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.PrintNewsStory&id=2943 just gonna leave this here since people are actually using data for once