Jump to content

Fabion66

Members
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fabion66

  1. Hello. Thanks for your kind answer first of all. But I didn't understand what you mean with "introduced APs functionality for the Harrier". What is the Aps functionality introduced? Auto Pilot maybe ? And where I can find it ? Thanks Fabio
  2. Hello to all. Yesterday there has been an appreciated upgrade to the Hornet through the Hotfix 3 in DCS Wordl 2.5. There I can read textually "Added EHSD Moving Map (Work-in-Progress)". I did the upgrade, after I played the Harried but the EHSD still doesn't have a moving map. When I click in EHSD page on the left "maps"..there is written "no map". Someone can help me to understand? Do I do something wrong ? thanks . Fabio
  3. Hello to all. I ve dowloaded the new DCS world 2.5.0 beta and it's amazing. Apart of the incredible beauty of the naure rendered, I am happy to see that something is changed also in the AV8B... now it's possible to use the litening with GBU 12 without mistakes. The bombs (all the bombs) hit the assigned targets. And also it's possible to hit moving targets like in the A10C. The litening after a little bit switch to point....Great. And, more, the viewfinder of the litening is precise. If I shoot with the gun where the viewfinder is pointed, the target is exactly under the viewfinder . Before was not. I 've also noticed that finally the Mk20 are rather effective. I tried them against some BTR80 and they were after all destroyed. Thanks you Zeus and thank you Razbam...now if I can ask.... GBU38 when ? ;) Bye
  4. Hello to all. Someone of you noticed how few effective are the Mk20 rockeye? I know that they aren't CBU 97 or CBU 105 of course but I thought that they were better. By the way they are CEM, combined effect munitions...so...where is the effect?...I tried to use them on 3 targets, 1 T55, 1 BTR 80 and 1 Boman but without any result. Only few infantry nearby (but not many) was killed by the Mk20... a poor effect. I found better to use against the same targets some Mk83... I am sure that the Mk20 hit the targets....but, I repeat, no result... Is it true this poor effect or it's a bug or maybe I do something wrong in the configuration? I use CIP programm to lauch these bombs because CCRP (auto) now is not still ready for a good shot, at least without a laser guide. Thank you for some kind answer. Fabio
  5. Hello. I have the same problem . Alwayes it workd before...but now not.... I asked to technical support a solution, if they have. By the way, I see that I am not alone in this problem....
  6. :thumbup: Thank you really for the quick answer. I don't use multiplayer usually , I prefer to play alone, so, in some way, I could use this patch but for what I ve understood it's better to don'tuse it anyway. I hope that Dcs or Razbam will think about this possibility (a road farp) adding a hause made patch without related problems because I think that, in multiplayer or in single missions, now that there is this new plane, this kind of farp would be very nice, giving a near to unlimited number of places where to take off and land. This patch could be avoided if it would be possibile to have a vertical take off from the actual Farp with some weapons load, but, for what I know and for what I tryed, it's not possible, at least in Nevada map . Bye
  7. Hello. Where is possible to find this road Farp created by P. . do you have a link for the download? And, can this create after some problem with the original DCS / Razbam products? Thanks. Bye Fabio
  8. Hello. First of all I want to thank Razbam and Zeus for the last update in Nevada map. Although in the last Nevada update info there was not written about any upgrade of the Tgpod in the harrier, I found that, on the contrary, now in some way it works . So these has been a very appreciate surprise, considering that this is also an important period of holidays. I was able to launch a couple of mavericks using this system: tgpod for identification and then the button uncage the mav and finally the DMT Irmv prior to the launch. It worked. The tgpod also worked with the gbu 12 but not always. I mean, the first bomb hit the target but the second not always. I saw that the bomb goes the second time in the same place where the first has been released... also if, of course I ve changed the target because the first is destroyed... this is probably because it's a wip like Zeus told many times..... the tgpod is anyway very effective still now, using it by night with non guided weapons such as rockets because it allows a clear identification of the target and, in the same time, during the night, the land targets without a radar cannot see you. They only shot without aiming . Amazing....go on with your job Razbam...
  9. Hello to all. Someone of you knows if it is possible to create a place in Nevada map where to take off with the possibilty of refueling and rearming without a real FARP ? I mean...I d like to take off from a highway or anyway an enought long street with the Harrier, with the possibility to turn back in the same place, land, rearm and refuel and take off again in order to go on with the same mission. I tried in many ways but I am unable. The only possible thing is take off from a FARP with VTO. But in this way, with vertical take off, I can fly with a very small quantity of fuel and armament. Otherwise the plane doesn't take off. So, in order to have many armanent I put the AV8B in modality "take off from the groud, on a highway and near an ammo depot (from static warehouse), a fuel depot (from static warehouse) a farp command post (from static) a farp fuel depot (from static) a farp ammo depot (from static) and a farp tend 8from static)... but when I ask to rearm none answer me. I tried also to create a link (from one side to the other and also to both sides) between the ammo warehouse and an airport (from the menu on the right ...suppliers...add..and then click to the airport) but the same....none anwer... any suggestion?...thanks Bye
  10. Thank you Zeus for your job . I ll try to use it. Bye
  11. Great job anyway ! :). It works. It's exaclty what we are waiting for I think....the possibility to use GBU 12 with the Harrier (without the need to use the jtac with its problems ) .... go ahead with the tests ;) Bye
  12. Thank you Zeus. Waiting for some news I salute you.
  13. Hello to all. Changing argument from the colour of the Flir, someone of you ever noticed that the JTAC often doesn't work properly ? I mean..sometimes they tell you "abort abort abort, sometimes they don't answer after that you told " ready to copy remarks" and sometimes they don't speak at all, also if now we are using the "easy communications option". I normally use like Afac an ATGW Stryker, because that veicole has the laser and I put it really near to the targets, also to unrealistic distances, some 150 metres, in order to have a clean Los to the target. Unfortunatly, also in this way often the Jtac doesn't work and that's a pity, because when it works it's really amazing... I hope that Razbam will give us soon an upgrade for the Litening pod, the best to use for aiming... By the way, do you have any suggestion for the Jtac or it's simply a bug ? Because if it is a bug, this bug last since many time... I 've noticed the same thing also using the Mirage 2000C... thanks for any suggestion and answer. Fabio
  14. to 59th_RAVENS Thanks . I tried and it works like you actually suggested. The only thing is that I have to add also the helipad. In this way it works . I would have preferred not to use the helipad, but, instead, to use only the 4 farp structures (tend, ammo, fuel and command post), without helipad. Because till know I am not still a very good harrier virtual pilot, as I have some problems still with landing in the exact place where I want to land So, without the helipad would have been more easy. By the way, thanks for the suggestion. Bye. Fabio
  15. Thanks . I tried and it works like you actually suggested. The only thing is that I have to add also the helipad. In this way it works . I would have preferred not to use the helipad, but, instead, to use only the 4 farp structures (tend, ammo, fuel and command post), without helipad. Because till know I am not still a very good harrier virtual pilot, as I have some problems still with landing in the exact place where I want to land :) So, without the helipad would have been more easy. By the way, thanks for the suggestion. Bye. Fabio
  16. :thumbup: Thanks a lot....today I ll try.
  17. Hello to all. I have another question.... Someone of you is able to recieve an answer taking off from a Farp with the Harrier ? I ask this thing because I put 1 command center, 1 farp command, 1 farp tend, 1 farp ammo storage, 1 farp ammo fuel near to my harrier but when I ask to the ground crew to rearm and reful none aswer me. The farp is without the helipad. I tried to do this thing both in Dcs 158 hotfix2 (yesterday's upgrade) and in Nevada map but doesn't work. CPU I7 3,4 HD 500ssd ram, 16 gb ram, video card Radeon 8gb, win10
  18. So it's not yet implemented.... thank you very much for the quick and kind answer.... this simulation is really great... it's like in real life for what i see in the video that you post me.......I hope a patch will be given to us in order to be able to use the laser like in the video and actually like I supposed it worked....(fire button) ...thanks again. Fabio
  19. TGPOD AND LASING INFO Hello to all. I need an information about the TGPOD. Someone of you knows when will be possible to use the laser to designate the target with the Tgpod carried by the Harrier ? Because after that I ve watched in you tube the video about how to slew it, I am able to do this thing too. But at the end I cannot find the equivalent button NWS (nose wheel steering) that there is in the A10C to lase the target Or maybe I miss something ? Thanks
  20. Thanks for the information :thumbup:
  21. thanks for suggestion :thumbup:
×
×
  • Create New...