ataribaby

NP, thanks a lot.

No bug really? Outward angled HUD frames are pretty significant F-16 cockpit feature that put Hud frames out of pilot FOV as much as possible. Your HUD frame is parallel - wrong.

[NO BUG] Wrong HUD frame ED, please fix HUD frame - it is more wide in front direction to not interfere with pilot FOV You made HUD frames parallel. It is pretty significant feature of cockpit. Hope it is not too late to edit cockpit model.

Multirole link points to Fighter version.

Yep I have them both. Part of DCS install.

Yep I use 10cm extension and table mount so stick is between legs :)

Yeah, just personal preference. Just using curves from pic pasted here earlier and it is sweet spot for me. Learned to fly her and it is joy now.

Yeah that values from picture is sweet spot for me. After few flights I adapted from FBW realm to this beautiful bird. Thanks all for help and suggestions!

Yep I have 10 cm extension. Thanks for diagram. I have pitch amd roll dead zone set to 3. (Warthog doesn't need big dead zones) I will try bigger form diagram.

Yep I trim her. For me it is very sensitive near center. Even slight movement of my Warthog stick in pitch results in big pitch command - I solved it to set pitch and roll curves to 25. It is not some warthog setting or so - all other modules are fine. As said, I probably need find sweet spot curves for me and get some time with her.

I will try. Kursant campaign is great to learn her.

Thanks for answer. I see your COG argument now. I go then to get some stick time to get used with her. What do you recommend? Keep my curves or set it to zero?

Hello, Recently got L-39 module and Kursant campaign and I found FM to be very sensitive - without any curves set to my Warthog even slightest movement of stick causes big pitch movement. I checked elevator surfaces movement with external view and this seems to be normal and inline with stick pitch deviation. It is just FM that is so sensitive. I can't believe that slight elevator angle can produce that big pitch change. I was unable to control jet till I set curvers to about 30. Is this normal or there is something fishy with FM and latest Open Beta?

Nice that you like tool. It helped me a lot to "archive" all my new mappings. No import planed yet. First I want improve pan and zoom and add F/A-18 grip.

Not yet pacastro, It needs bigger change in editation. Good idea.

I will add F-18 Grip.

@luckyhendrix: I am happy you found app useful. Already made all my new mappings with it and printed them. @SGT Coyle: Should be straightforward. Just open tool and start write your mappings into boxes. Use Edit menu to set chart name and font and font size (or keep default). Via View menu you can switch view between stick and throttle. You can save your chart or print/export to PNG. When printing or exporting only active view will be printed/exported. Save/Load of course works for both.

SGT Coyle yup I understand that. I was just bit shocked that such simple .net app is flagged as threat by some AV software. At first I was scared I got infection in my PC but same was when I build tool on my work PC. Anyway I removed Win32 API calls. Modal dialog windows now have closing. I think I must live with that. You can even build tool yourself - download and checkout code from GitHub and install Visual Studio Community Edition (2019 is latest now) with .NET app creation components installed and open .sln file, hit Buid solution and in Bin folder will be your new fresh exe to run.

Yeah, I already printed all my newly remapped DCS planes after loss of mappings :) Today I will do Elite Dangerous and Il-2 Sturmovik BOS. I always have hard time to remember mappings after I switch sim for a while. This sheets solves it for me.

Made little research and found that call to win32 API to remove X button from modal dialog windows causing MB to think it is threat. Of course it is completely legal code. I have no nerves to this so I removed this code and MB now passes. New release v1.0.2.1 is up. Sorry for inconvenience.

here we go: https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/229924-machine-learninganomalous94/ https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/239404-false-positive-machinelearninganomalous/ https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/230734-sharpscript-machinelearninganomalous100/ It is problem on MB side not on mine.

What? What are you talking about? What threat it detected? Edit: installed MB and and it marks it as threat. It must be false detection as it was freshly compiled exe. You can build yourself from github source.

I need think about any import functionality.

Released new version with some fixes and new features.

Added source code and releases to GitHub.