Skyron

Maybe in two weeks.....

Well you can't shoot things in DCS while in F18 either mate.

My Man!!!! 10+ years patience?? Things should go better, not worse.

My Dear Friend, If we all have all these years not supported ED's when and releasing nice looking videos asking for money, is not telling that the module will be ready in 4 years. I am an ED funboy, and supporter, i have allmost every module spent allmost a thousant ****ing dollars. i know very well of what are you talking about, and you know what im talking about, and please dont start the "this is beta , if you dont want dont play". ED IS forcing us mentally to play BETA, or else - no multiplayer ,no? ED does not know that 90% play BETA? Why this shit behavior? For me, these things are unacceptable. you dont read what i write, i speak about breaking old things that were working, not BETA Test something new. They shound test at least BASIC things before release. How can we test new things if the shit cant fly and battle? This is the most expensive game ever in the planet, dont behave us like sheep

i totally understand this might be a chain reaction, as long as i can recall , mostly ED modules problems makes them unplayable. like yesterdays, total radar breakout, you can remember other things like INS collapse, not able to even Fly from one point to another and many other things. i Have never been able and not to fly and shoot down while in the F14, or in Mig21, or in JF17, or Viggen. i Can understand little minor problems, but how can you release a beta update with the most popular modules been not even playable? As you said, 90% of the community is only playing Beta version of DCS with 10% been only very casual players. My opinion is that ED strategy pushed all this 90% to play in BETA. i will repeat that this is not a 30$ game like IL2, or - FSX. DCS is a very expensive hoddy that should be equally respected. Beta testing is for testing something new, not destroy past fixes, they should TEST atleast major functionalities, at least been able to do thigs you did before.

Dear Dudi, thanks for your answer. if my bad English let me understood your answer, there are too few times where another developer (HeatBlur - Deka - Leatherneck - etc) , Why not modules from that dont have any problems? Why do those delivered almost ended modules and ED - which is the mother Company cant? Its frustrating when in almost every update they break something that is already working? These i write are not some kind of toxic-ironic questions, they are real questions. This is not professional work.

Nice to meet you Gary. Still you didnt answer any questions about this thread.

Also, your out of my questions, Is ED taking advantage of our love for flying to do FREE beta testing? Shouldn't they try at least the basics before release even some BETA update?

What is this FSX? does it have 80 dollar never ended modules?

Yes garyscott, is not shattering any earth, but sometime this thing has to stop. im 36YO, and i play DCS since 2003 (LOMAC). I played more that a thousant, for some shitty developer not doing good this job. This aint a game you pay 30dollars to play forever.

Guyz, this BETA thing joke you tell all the time, is to BETA test something new, not to **** up everything. Yes ill do beta testing to the new things. no problem with that. and - OK, ill go to stable, witch stable module is complete? hohoho.

No man, i have modules total cost of 1000$. Are you kidding me?

Is ED taking advantage of our love for flying to do FREE beta testing? Shouldn't they try at least the basics before release even some BETA update? If i Go to Stable, will i have all F16 and F18 systems that i paid for, and don't have then even after 2 years? Why only ED's responsibility modules have problems and not other companies? Heatblur? Let's see what Microprose has to offer.

WE should be paid to do bug hunting. This job is not for free, our love for aircrafts should not be exploited.

Hey Thanks! :)

Hey Folks, I'm very excited about new toys coming to DCS. Seems that A/A RADAR with 4 BARS scanning is: 14 to 19 thousand feet @ 20 miles -or 07 to 26 thousand feet @ 60 miles is a little bit smaller compared to other aircraft. Will, it is like this in the future?

Yes, i ment PL-12. Keks, you dont seem to be very happy about bringing new toys in DCS. Well im not a weapon systems expert like you, but SD-10, is not OP. Its preaty easy to avoid it. 120's were OP all these years.

**Wiki** J-11A – Chinese/Russian assembled Su-27SK from Russian-made kits. 104 were built. They were later upgraded with MAWS. Unconfirmed upgrades include improved cockpit displays, and fire control systems for R-77 or PL-10 missiles.[23] It is also called J-11.[24] J-11B – Indigenously-produced version using Chinese technology,[23] and the first J-11 variant to use the WS-10A turbofan.[25] The airframe is slightly lighter due to greater use of composites.[26] It has new avionics, a glass cockpit, MAWS, and onboard oxygen generator system.[27] Upgrading to AESA radar may have been planned.[26] Photos of China's latest, very long range PL-15 missile on a J-11B may well indicate the undergoing upgrades of AESA radar to the aircraft.[28]

Is there any chance for getting an SD-10 on the Deka's J11A? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_J-11 It seems that it is legit.

Hey there! How can i change a mission , to a mission of my list? Can i force Dedicated server to just load next mission from my mission list every X hours? Without having to "Mission Edit" every mission in the list. Thanks in advance.

Save your 80$, it seems thats its too early for the 16. You should wait for more than one year for the module to be somehow playable. Its been almost 1,5 years that the same thing happens with the 18.

3600 here with 2018TI, and everything works perfect. 75-80% single core Ultilization in DCS

Thank you!

hey thanks, didnt knew that. i think that is not happening that much @ Caucasus tho.

Its not only the AIM7, its the radar guiding it. Countermeasures are very easy to distract F14 Radar. i even lock ships with PAL mode, @ PG Map. This also happens with the AIM54. if you keep TWS after shot, the missle will miss more often than if you break away and missile guides by its own.