Kaptein_Damli Posted June 30, 2007 Posted June 30, 2007 Just wanted to know if you fly with full g-effect or reduced. And what happens if the server has realistic g-effect and I have reduced? I find the full g-effect to be, yep, to often going black. You can´t do much before the pilot sees black. I know this is suppose to be realistic, but I find the screen to go black all the time. There should have been something in between! So, I am just curious, full or reduced g-effect? My moviemaking channel at YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/RobertDamli
Kuky Posted June 30, 2007 Posted June 30, 2007 I use Reduced G effects as I think they are most realistic. I believe pilots in real air forces train to sustain at least 7 / 8 G's... and those really good (physically to sustain G's) can do 9G's. In LockOn with realistic setting you will black you if you pull more then 6G's and if you've been in couple of high G turns don't think you can do even 6 without starting to black out. PC specs: Windows 11 Home | Asus TUF Gaming B850-Plus WiFi | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + LC 360 AIO | MSI RTX 5090 LC 360 AIO | 55" Samsung Odyssey Gen 2 | 64GB PC5-48000 DDR5 | 1TB M2 SSD for OS | 2TB M2 SSD for DCS | NZXT C1000 Gold ATX 3.1 1000W | TM Cougar Throttle, Floor Mounted MongoosT-50 Grip on TM Cougar board, MFG Crosswind, Track IR
A.S Posted June 30, 2007 Posted June 30, 2007 Discussed here also.......... http://www.fighterops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6724 read through [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Vekkinho Posted June 30, 2007 Posted June 30, 2007 I did a lot of flying in LOMAC and Most of the time I used Reallistic G effects. But I find it to aggressive. It might be modelled correctly for a mortal that will never take off in a F-15, one with no G training at all that would black out during sustained 2G turn but professional pilots of such planes should sustain more G for a longer period of time than what's presented in LOMAC with Reallistic setting. F-15 is a plane that has a best ROT at high subsonic speeds (0.8-1.0Mach) and if you do some turns with that speed you'll experience blackouts too often to be succesful in dogfight. So I turned G settings to simplified. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Kuky Posted June 30, 2007 Posted June 30, 2007 after reading that thread at FOPS I'm thinking probably the G effect should be right between "Realistic" and "Reduced" but this sure as hell can depend greatly from person to person.. even among pilots PC specs: Windows 11 Home | Asus TUF Gaming B850-Plus WiFi | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + LC 360 AIO | MSI RTX 5090 LC 360 AIO | 55" Samsung Odyssey Gen 2 | 64GB PC5-48000 DDR5 | 1TB M2 SSD for OS | 2TB M2 SSD for DCS | NZXT C1000 Gold ATX 3.1 1000W | TM Cougar Throttle, Floor Mounted MongoosT-50 Grip on TM Cougar board, MFG Crosswind, Track IR
The_GOZR Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 Is fatigue designed into the Stick force ( shouldn't ) ? or it simulate damaged surfaces ?
The_GOZR Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 OK here a small quick track of a Su27 Realistic Demo Su-27 Realistic setting. I think a lots of you are a bit off with regarding the maneuvers with the speed of the aircraft, try to go around and respect the actual real speed or the aircraft not doing crazy move at 1000+ km/h I have good result with the F15 as well. Please post your short track here and lets see..
Recommended Posts