Old possible-flyable list

[amalahama]

Back on 2007, Olgerd posted a list of what aircraft could or couldn't be modelled based on the amount of material available (and gathered by ED, I assume). I don't feel like bringing up such an old post, but here you have the direct link to it:

 

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=20888

 

I wonder whether this list has changed over the years and aircraft poorly documented then are in a better shape today. Basically if planes from group 2 have passed to group 3.

 

Intriguing enough, A-10C is included in "Not gonna happen for 5-10 years" group :D

 

Regards!

[FoxHoundELite]

just look what we've been through since this post.....too many things happened right? :)

[SkateZilla]

Back on 2007, Olgerd posted a list of what aircraft could or couldn't be modelled based on the amount of material available (and gathered by ED, I assume). I don't feel like bringing up such an old post, but here you have the direct link to it:

 

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=20888

 

I wonder whether this list has changed over the years and aircraft poorly documented then are in a better shape today. Basically if planes from group 2 have passed to group 3.

 

Intriguing enough, A-10C is included in "Not gonna happen for 5-10 years" group :D

 

Regards!

 

January 2007 -> April 2011 = 4.5 Years + ANG/USAF Contract.

 

the list is pretty much invalid now,

As F-16, AH-64 and other Airframes were listed as in production in 2008 and havent heard anything about them in years.