Jump to content

SkateZilla

ED Beta Testers
  • Posts

    19843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by SkateZilla

  1. Not to be a pickle, But there's no water to hold with this, it sounds like someone just decided to cook up a complaint to the server admins to justify their losing streak. As for Comparing VR to Non VR Screenshots and FoV, ie, the Above shot. That Little Circle would be stretched across 160°+ of your vision depending on headset,
  2. I can tell you stories about norton and kaspersky, their software will take 1 line of code and flag it as a false positive. If the App is being flagged, delete it and re-download it, but the EXE was likely injected by another.
  3. The Newtonsoft DLL needs to be in the same folder as the App. Normally I Update the app as soon as possible after a new release, As stated a few pages back, the app is undergoing an extensive re-write, what started as 1 re-write has expanded into what I've started this week as the forth re-write, due to a few things overlooked in the new code, and windows updated to remove some things previously used. I will post a news update as soon as I am comfortable with the state of things. To add fuel to a fire, My employer recently re-structured, and decided to discontinue my position despite it being a vital position (and despite the work I put into it), that being said, I was able to transfer to another department to continue working, but the main issue now is gas, as it's more travelling as my home base office is no longer right across the street, but 20 minutes and 2 tolls away.
  4. 3 Prototypes were built, it never got beyond that, so there's likely no printed manuals for it anywhere. Ka-50 had over 30, and the Su-25T was a upgrade program which converted Su-25UBs to the T, they only converted a Dozen (including the prototypes.), but it was a active Aircraft and was fielded by Russian, as was the Ka-50, Comparing those two to a Prototype that only had 3 built, and never was deployed. Ummm,. There is not a New F-5E Module coming.
  5. pretty sure they do them now
  6. Use the Force Rooster, Mav had a working TGP on his Foxtrot.
  7. Please Also attach a .trk or a .miz
  8. just to note, everyone on YT, and Movie reviewers saying the "Mystery nation" had to be Iran because of the F-14s. A. It was described as a breakaway, likely a group of extremists, B. By the comment above, RU is the only nation with Su-57s, so... the reason for the F-14s is so no one can say it was russia, and the reason for the Su57s is so no one can say it was the IIAF. C. the F-14A used by the group was not Iranian, as it had the TCS Chinpod with Aero Cover, Iranian Tomcats did not have a TCS Chinpod, so they didnt come from IIAF.
  9. That's what everyone wants though, no one wants just one export, everyone wants one of the many. If you fulfill one, someone is going to want another.
  10. I doubt you see sub DLC for aircraft like the F-4E, F-16, F-18 etc. The reason being, is those aircraft have Export options, Different Avionics, and sometimes different engines, the general shape may look the same but often they are completely different requiring not only the 3D Shapes to be re-done, but the Systems and Flight Model as well. For example: the F-4, AH-64 and F-16 were widely exported and produced not only in the USA by in factories in other countries. The Changes done to the Actual Airframe are extensive, the avionics swap outs as well. Same is said for the F/-18A/B/C/D and F/A-18E/F/G, Switzerland, Finland, Canada, Australia etc all have different avionics and extra options. (whether it's lights, solid wings, CFTs etc). The Export Lots have features not in use by the primary operator (USN/USAF). The Primary Operator is where most of these modules will continue to focus on. If ED was to do every Export Lot for Every Country, it would basically be a giant feature creep, as the list of changes from Operator to Operator is extensive. The Development Time/Cost to Return Ratio would not be feasible, as stated, most of these export versions have different avionics, engines and airframe shapes, each Country specific lot is essentially a new aircraft.
  11. I doubt you see sub DLC for aircraft like the F-4E, F-16, F-18 etc. The reason being, is those aircraft have Export options, Different Avionics, and sometimes different engines, the general shape may look the same but often they are completely different requiring not only the 3D Shapes to be re-done, but the Systems and Flight Model as well. For example: the F-4E, AH-64 and F-16 were widely exported and produced not only in the USA by in factories in other countries. The Changes done to the Actual Airframe are extensive, the avionics swap outs as well. Same is said for the F/-18A/B/C/D and F/A-18E/F/G, Switzerland, Finland, Canada, Australia etc all have different avionics and extra options. (whether it's lights, solid wings, CFTs etc). The Export Lots have features not in use by the primary operator (USN/USAF). The Primary Operator is where most of these modules will continue to focus on. If ED was to do every Export Lot for Every Country, it would basically be a giant feature creep, as the list of changes from Operator to Operator is extensive. The Development Time/Cost to Return Ratio would not be feasible, as stated, most of these export versions have different avionics, engines and airframe shapes, each Country specific lot is essentially a new aircraft.
  12. now we just gotta take the TCS Chin Housing off and replace with ALQ100 Chin by itself.
  13. Yes, Mainly LRIP 1 and 2 Bunos, were sent to be modified for the Demonstration Team. 2 From VX9, 2 From VFA 122, 1 from VFA 106, and 2 from VX 31 (Both of Which wore the Maverick Livery for Filming of TG:M). They also have several in reserve. Most of these Airframes have trapped out, so they no longer deploy to carriers, they are used in Fleet Reserve/Testing/Demonstration Roles. as Fleet Reserve units are transitioning from LRIP/Block I to Block II or Block III Aircraft, all of the LRIP and Block I's have been sent to either the Demonstration Team or Mothballed. All Block II Airframes will rotate to Cecil Field to undergo Service Life Extensions and Rebuild to Block III Spec.
  14. It would depend on the block, AGM-65s werent added until later Blocks (53?)
  15. The Superhornet itself is not exactly hard to get access to photograph, I know several photographers, myself included that have base access to photograph aircraft. There's a few forbidden shots, as somethings are still classified. For Laser scanning/Reference photo's I wasn't implying the use of "display aircraft" as most static displays have been modified. The USN allowed MS to Laser scan Airframe's, the main issue with the FS2020 SH, is the cockpit systems are not modelled at all or not modelled to the same depth as DCS.
  16. There is more than 1 reason the F-14D Manuals are still classified, and those reasons do not involve IIAF nor the IRST System. PS the NAVAIR01-F14AAD-1A is already public, and that's not what HB Needs.
  17. afaik, this is not a real issue and more incorrectly being setup? I run 5 Screens in Potrait, or 3 in landscape, I set my Viewport resolutions, and then set where I want to restrict the UI (ie to the center screen). And I've been doing this since DCS A-10C 1.1.1.1
  18. would also be helpful to post the dcs.log, as it records load/unload events.
  19. From my experience so far, laser scanning tends to deliver more accurate results, and has a quicker turn over. Having access to the airframe allows the team to collect high resolution photos of sections not normally photographed by public (internal bays, service doors, etc etc) The issue with Crowd Funding, is this community has been burnt by it too many times, pretty sure this community would likely never support a crowd funded module project or team again, So said "3rd Party" would have to secure their own Financial support elsewhere. Block I - Lot 24 Would be the latest Super Hornet, the systems are Pre HoL, and Pre AESA, so the OFP would be closer to that of the Lot 20 Hornet we have now, Lot 21 was EoL for Legacy and Start of LRIP of E/F, Lot 22/23 was LRIP, Lot 24 was full production lot for service. Anything after Lot 24 integrates provisions for AESA, ACS, Updated Countermeasure Systems, New OFP Format, DVMC, AMCD.
  20. Depending on Block/Lot: Available Data, Time/Money, Access to an Airframe to Laser Scan etc.
  21. And I say Again, there is no such Exclusive Rights Contract with Boeing, not for VRS, not for Microsoft, anyone or any developer of any games or simulations.
  22. As stated, your build is on DCS Stable, to update to the latest open beta version you will have to change branches:
  23. Windows is being told the Saved Games folder is located in /Saved Games/FSCAI/ Either by Setting, or by mk Link https://www.google.com/search?q=changing+windows+saved+games+location&oq=changing+windows+Saved+Games+lo&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j33i160l2j33i299.7861j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
×
×
  • Create New...