Bobby Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 (edited) HI alll I have read all posts about DCS WW2 and it's problematics. AS backer of that project, I need to say that I'm satisfied with how the things are going. It says many times that map development is expensive, so I ask myself why ED doesn't use existing map in scenario, for example Battle for Caucaus (Operation Edelweiss). In my opinion,that way the map and scenario wouldn't cost so much.:pilotfly: Edited July 11, 2014 by =Bobby=
Arrowhead Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 My guess is they don't want to directly compete with IL2:BoS right now... Intel i9 12900K ROG Ryujin II Hydro Cooler PNY GeForce RTX 5090 OC EpicX 64GB RAM DDR5-6000
AndyJWest Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 My guess is they don't want to directly compete with IL2:BoS right now... Possibly. And the planned aircraft would be out of place on the map. And the existing map only covers the extreme southerly part of the Caucaus front anyway.
cwmiforphill Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 To be honest, as DCS WW2 will primarily be used as an air-to-air combat simulator, I couldn't really give a donkeys if they simulated flying over that Atlantic ocean. A beautiful rendition of the ground is nice, but is window dressing. What I want are a good selection of well modeled aircraft and decent AI in the opposing aircaft. .
9.JG27 DavidRed Posted July 12, 2014 Posted July 12, 2014 not so much interested in an eastern front scenario.besides with the current announced planes it wouldnt fit anyway.im quite happy with the theater they chose.next on my list would be central europe, then MTO and PTO
SAM77 Posted July 12, 2014 Posted July 12, 2014 I want the La-5FN please and a Yak 9 anything :) Spoiler Intel i7 14700F | 64GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB | MSI RTX 4060 Gaming X 8G | WD Black SN770 2TB | Sound Blaster Audigy RX | MSI B760 Tomahawk WIFI | Thrustmaster T.16000M FCS Flight Pack | TrackIR 5 | Windows 11 Home |
Mnemonic Posted July 12, 2014 Posted July 12, 2014 Current map is not really good solution, all the airports are modern, most of the buildings in the cities by the look of them built after 1960.
NeilWillis Posted July 12, 2014 Posted July 12, 2014 Agreed, it'd need a complete revamp, and as previously stated, it wouldn't suit the projected aircraft mix anyway. Nice idea, but I guess it'll not be taken up.
Recommended Posts