Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Haha!! Holy flipping Matrix there Keanneu

ASUS Tuf Gaming Pro x570 / AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @ 3.8 / XFX Radeon 6900 XT / 64 GB DDR4 3200 

"This was not in the Manual I did not read", cried the Noob" - BMBM, WWIIOL

Posted

Awesome.

Windows 10 Home, Intel Core i7-9700K @ 4.6GHz, Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 Gaming (8GB VRAM) on 34" LG curved monitor @ 3440x1440, 32GB RAM, TrackIR 3 (with Vector Expansion), Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS, Saitek Combat Pedals, Thrustmaster Cougar MFDs.

Posted

That's great, like dooom said, the Matrix is real.



Win 10 64 Pro, MSI Z390 I7-9700K @5ghz Kraken Z63, 32Gb Corsair Dominator, MSI RTX-2070, 1TB NVME 2TB SSD's, TM Warthog, Pro Rudders, OpenTrack w/ IR Clip

Posted

You didn't throttle up, and catch up with the wing, so it could miraculously reattach too then?

 

Excellent save, but I suspect your laundry might be a little toxic after that!

 

:music_whistling: :music_whistling: :music_whistling:

Posted

No way man... That did not just happen. this is so hard to believe! Now that... Is skill! :D

Link to my Imgur screenshots and motto

 

http://imgur.com/a/Gt7dF

One day in DCS... Vipers will fly along side Tomcats... Bugs with Superbugs, Tiffy's with Tornado's, Fulcrums with Flankers and Mirage with Rafales...

:)The Future of DCS is a bright one:)

 

Posted
You didn't throttle up, and catch up with the wing, so it could miraculously reattach too then?

 

Honestly, I was half expecting him to overtake the broken wing, strike it with the other wing, and end up balanced out by breaking that one, too... at which point it'd fly straight, just... well, not slow =P

Posted
Honestly, I was half expecting him to overtake the broken wing, strike it with the other wing, and end up balanced out by breaking that one, too... at which point it'd fly straight, just... well, not slow =P

 

Hahaha I wish I wish

'Fear the strike'

Posted

wait what happened after the accident :D

Link to my Imgur screenshots and motto

 

http://imgur.com/a/Gt7dF

One day in DCS... Vipers will fly along side Tomcats... Bugs with Superbugs, Tiffy's with Tornado's, Fulcrums with Flankers and Mirage with Rafales...

:)The Future of DCS is a bright one:)

 

Posted

Maybe send it ED for physics bug tracking. I imagine, there must be no wing structure so strong to cause horizontal roll at that inpact speed. :huh:

DCS F16C 52+ w JHMCS ! DCS AH64D Longbow !

Posted
Maybe send it ED for physics bug tracking. I imagine, there must be no wing structure so strong to cause horizontal roll at that inpact speed. :huh:

 

Who exactly would I send it to?

 

Name is claimed now thanks to arglmauf haha!

 

I trimmed it to f ... and then tried to keep going with the gates and crashed haha. I recon if i tried and land it I would. She was quite stable at slow turns anything tight was a disaster hence why i crashed.

'Fear the strike'

Posted
Strange physics /aerodynamics / damage model.... Well... but lucky you were indeed :)

 

I don't see huge issues with the aerodynamic model; it seems to have behaved relatively believably (it seems like the engine should have dragged the plane more down into the dirt, but considering the speed at which the maneuver completed, and that the blades would be stalling, it's believable to me).

 

What I do have issue with is the damage model. That aircraft was going over 350 mph indicated, from what I could see. The wings going flat-on to the airflow should have torn them right off.

 

I think the way wing overstress damage is calculated in DCS is based on lift loading or something (in this situation, there's technically no "lift", since the wing is stalled, so maybe the physics engine ignored it?), but the raw drag should have snapped them.

  • Like 1
Posted

What I do have issue with is the damage model. That aircraft was going over 350 mph indicated, from what I could see. The wings going flat-on to the airflow should have torn them right off.

 

Exactly.

 

+Why is the wingtip that touched the ground and broke off flying faster than the plane ? :D

The friction with the ground should have slowed it down more than the plane.

Posted
Exactly.

 

 

 

+Why is the wingtip that touched the ground and broke off flying faster than the plane ? :D

 

The friction with the ground should have slowed it down more than the plane.

 

 

Welcome to DCS logic! :lol:

Link to my Imgur screenshots and motto

 

http://imgur.com/a/Gt7dF

One day in DCS... Vipers will fly along side Tomcats... Bugs with Superbugs, Tiffy's with Tornado's, Fulcrums with Flankers and Mirage with Rafales...

:)The Future of DCS is a bright one:)

 

Posted

LOL, that was awesome.

 

The physics engine obviously doesn't take into account the exact same forces on the debris as on the aircraft, which is okay I think. Imagine how the system would run if the physics engine went from calculating for one object to instantly a whole number of objects --including their weight, form and velocity--, just so that blown off pieces flew exactly as they would in RL :huh:.

 

What I wonder about more is that after spinning 360% the aircraft could recover so smoothly, as if the inertia of nearly 10,000 lbs. rotating at that speed could be so quickly overcome.

 

Question, can you recover from a spin like that with a healthy aircraft that quickly :joystick:?

When you hit the wrong button on take-off

hwl7xqL.gif

System Specs.

Spoiler
System board: MSI X670E ACE Memory: 64GB DDR5-6000 G.Skill Ripjaw System disk: Crucial P5 M.2 2TB
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D PSU: Corsair HX1200 PSU Monitor: ASUS MG279Q, 27"
CPU cooling: Noctua NH-D15S Graphics card: MSI RTX 3090Ti SuprimX VR: Oculus Rift CV1
 
Posted

The thing is I think because of the way I hit the ground I had actually very little say to the outcome that was 90% Luck, 5% Physics and 5% Skill hahaha

'Fear the strike'

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...