Mirage 2000 Discussion (On Topic Only)

[Kelevra9987]

If you mean the pod that looks like a sidewinder, then yes. The M-2000C can carry it and will be included.

 

I mean that thing seen here:

 

[snowsniper]

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2611964&postcount=6

 

help needed if someone don't mind to give a help.

I did a check list in french from the realaircraft manual, and did compare with razbam pre-manual. I've got some few questions and interrogations to make the final check list kneeboard in french. questions and things to check are in grey colours in the file attached.

 

thanks

[Dee-Jay]

Cockpit is too tight. We tried but the body basically hides every single side panel.

 

Same IRL indeed. MF1 is even tighter than M2K!

[-7th-Kilgore]

[ame]

[/ame] Edited December 27, 2015 by -7th-Kilgore

[rrohde]

No. Cockpit is too tight. We tried but the body basically hides every single side panel.

 

That's why pilot bodies can be toggled on/off with Rshift+P. That's something we all do when we need to access any panels in other modules as well.

 

Having said that, I certainly would want to see a pilot body. That's how DCS does things - and it helps immersion tremendously.

 

So - RAZBAM - please add the option to have a pilot body, and allow us to toggle it off when needed. :thumbup:

 

Thank you!

[Sporg]

No. Cockpit is too tight. We tried but the body basically hides every single side panel.

 

That's why pilot bodies can be toggled on/off with Rshift+P. That's something we all do when we need to access any panels in other modules as well.

 

Having said that, I certainly would want to see a pilot body. That's how DCS does things - and it helps immersion tremendously.

 

So - RAZBAM - please add the option to have a pilot body, and allow us to toggle it off when needed. :thumbup:

 

Thank you!

 

+1 Please give us option for pilot body.

Possibly with click through for hidden switches.

[Gliptal]

Would an head tracking system take care of the pilot body problem?