Vitormouraa Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 I wouldnt mind Laser MAVs back...:joystick: Why would you like a non fire and forget missile? :music_whistling: SplashOneGaming Discord https://splashonegaming.com
Pocket Sized Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 Why would you like a non fire and forget missile? :music_whistling: In DCS? Longer range or something idk In real life? Because mavericks suck. Keep in mind that they're an optical/thermally guided missile, so it's possible for them to lock the wrong target or lose track after launch. Don't even get me started on force correlated launches, they're only good for hitting one section of a large target, ie the corner of a warehouse. Laser mavericks are good because somebody on the ground can point a laser and the missile will land there from a decent standoff range no matter what he's pointing at. It could be a camouflaged tank, underground bunker, or a frog on a unicycle... none of which a standard maverick would be able to target. (Except maybe the last one, but you'd have to be REALLY close) DCS modules are built up to a spec, not down to a schedule. In order to utilize a system to your advantage, you must know how it works.
Eddie Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 I was referring to specifically missing LITENING pod and aircraft system TGP features, never mind other systems and weapons. Multi target cueing and multi target tracking being just two.
Recommended Posts