Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

guess at best just keep lookout for a Modded Su27 with acess to R77s online.

 

Ive seen a server have F15s with Phoenix missiles, so its just a matter of having a server that accepts such mods.

Edited by Kev2go

 

Build:

 

Windows 10 64 bit Pro

Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD,  WD 1TB HDD

 

Posted
Sorry but what is E-E;

 

Ethiopia-Eritrea war

 

pK & netcode?

 

Percentage kill

 

netcode is what connects events in the server with the clients. Warpy/laggy/buggy netcode plays havoc with missiles, especially SARH missiles.

 

Also, proper implementation of the Su27 datalink? What's missing/erroneous?

 

Peer to peer datalink without the need for AWACs or GCI.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]



64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron

Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron

TS: 195.201.110.22

Posted
This is how useless the R-27s in reality are.

 

 

 

And we don't have a choice but to carry 4 of these dead weights. Highly disadvantageous being a Su27 driver in DCS when you're going up against F15s,16s & 18s with AMRAAMs. We need the AMRAAMSKIs.

 

 

Yes, let´s disregard the literally HUNDREDS of US made missiles fired and missing targets all throughout history even after Vietnam.

 

How bout those two Phoenix missiles fired by F-14s against an Iraqi MiG-25, both missed and the 25 escaped unharmed.

 

How bout most air-to-air kills in the Gulf War being made with Sidewinders.

 

So, all BVR missiles suck, let´s update everything to carry Aim-120D Amraams instead.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

GCI: "Control to SEAD: Enemy SAM site 190 for 30, cleared to engage"

Striker: "Copy, say Altitude?"

GCI: "....Deck....it´s a SAM site..."

Striker: "Oh...."

Fighter: "Yeah, those pesky russian build, baloon based SAMs."

 

-Red-Lyfe

 

Best way to troll DCS community, make an F-16A, see how dedicated the fans really are :thumbup:

Posted
Yes, let´s disregard the literally HUNDREDS of US made missiles fired and missing targets all throughout history even after Vietnam.

 

How bout those two Phoenix missiles fired by F-14s against an Iraqi MiG-25, both missed and the 25 escaped unharmed.

 

How bout most air-to-air kills in the Gulf War being made with Sidewinders.

 

So, all BVR missiles suck, let´s update everything to carry Aim-120D Amraams instead.

 

well there is quite a difference between the because Aim7M of the 80s is not the modern Aim120c

 

Build:

 

Windows 10 64 bit Pro

Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD,  WD 1TB HDD

 

Posted
Exactly! 27's job is to strike not just spook...and it doesn't do it's job at all...AMRAAMSKIs plz; I guess with it the Su27s will be quite formidable!

 

For that they need to add an Su-27S/SM/SMK or something like that which is very different. The standard Su-27 we have on DCS is the first Su-27s that came in service which are comparable to the F-15A from the 1960s/70s, vs F-15Cs from the 1980s/90s so for that you need to see which were the first Su-27s models to be upgraded with the R-77 and then, see if there is enough info on that model available publicly for ED to make it.

 

Hopefully in the future ED might update the F-15C to the MSIP II standard with the AESA radars and the AIM-9X and hopefully we'll see more Flankers, possibly a flyable Su-35 and maybe an Su-30MKI (psst I know you love that plane) :smilewink:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

Planes: FC3, P-51, F-86, F-5E, Mirage 2000, F/A-18, F-14, F-16, Mig-19P :joystick:

 

ED pls gib A-4 and F-4 :cry:

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...