Kev2go Posted July 15, 2016 Posted July 15, 2016 (edited) guess at best just keep lookout for a Modded Su27 with acess to R77s online. Ive seen a server have F15s with Phoenix missiles, so its just a matter of having a server that accepts such mods. Edited July 15, 2016 by Kev2go Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD
*Rage* Posted July 15, 2016 Posted July 15, 2016 Sorry but what is E-E; Ethiopia-Eritrea war pK & netcode? Percentage kill netcode is what connects events in the server with the clients. Warpy/laggy/buggy netcode plays havoc with missiles, especially SARH missiles. Also, proper implementation of the Su27 datalink? What's missing/erroneous? Peer to peer datalink without the need for AWACs or GCI. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22
Chrinik Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 This is how useless the R-27s in reality are. And we don't have a choice but to carry 4 of these dead weights. Highly disadvantageous being a Su27 driver in DCS when you're going up against F15s,16s & 18s with AMRAAMs. We need the AMRAAMSKIs. Yes, let´s disregard the literally HUNDREDS of US made missiles fired and missing targets all throughout history even after Vietnam. How bout those two Phoenix missiles fired by F-14s against an Iraqi MiG-25, both missed and the 25 escaped unharmed. How bout most air-to-air kills in the Gulf War being made with Sidewinders. So, all BVR missiles suck, let´s update everything to carry Aim-120D Amraams instead. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] GCI: "Control to SEAD: Enemy SAM site 190 for 30, cleared to engage" Striker: "Copy, say Altitude?" GCI: "....Deck....it´s a SAM site..." Striker: "Oh...." Fighter: "Yeah, those pesky russian build, baloon based SAMs." -Red-Lyfe Best way to troll DCS community, make an F-16A, see how dedicated the fans really are :thumbup:
Kev2go Posted July 17, 2016 Posted July 17, 2016 Yes, let´s disregard the literally HUNDREDS of US made missiles fired and missing targets all throughout history even after Vietnam. How bout those two Phoenix missiles fired by F-14s against an Iraqi MiG-25, both missed and the 25 escaped unharmed. How bout most air-to-air kills in the Gulf War being made with Sidewinders. So, all BVR missiles suck, let´s update everything to carry Aim-120D Amraams instead. well there is quite a difference between the because Aim7M of the 80s is not the modern Aim120c Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD
carss Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 Exactly! 27's job is to strike not just spook...and it doesn't do it's job at all...AMRAAMSKIs plz; I guess with it the Su27s will be quite formidable! For that they need to add an Su-27S/SM/SMK or something like that which is very different. The standard Su-27 we have on DCS is the first Su-27s that came in service which are comparable to the F-15A from the 1960s/70s, vs F-15Cs from the 1980s/90s so for that you need to see which were the first Su-27s models to be upgraded with the R-77 and then, see if there is enough info on that model available publicly for ED to make it. Hopefully in the future ED might update the F-15C to the MSIP II standard with the AESA radars and the AIM-9X and hopefully we'll see more Flankers, possibly a flyable Su-35 and maybe an Su-30MKI (psst I know you love that plane) :smilewink: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Planes: FC3, P-51, F-86, F-5E, Mirage 2000, F/A-18, F-14, F-16, Mig-19P :joystick: ED pls gib A-4 and F-4 :cry:
Recommended Posts