dotChuckles Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 So I have an i7-4790k overclocked to 4.6, 16GB of RAM, and everything running off a solid state drive. Currently I have a Standard GTX970 too. My Rift is on the way and i'm hoping to just try it out with my current system for a bit before I spend some more money. So when that moment inevitably comes in a months time and I wan't to buy a new card. Which should I go for 1070 or 1080? I have read a few posts that I didn't really understand, that the 1080 isn't so good. Does that mean the 1070 is giving better performance? Or is the 1080 performing better but not as much as it should? As I say, i'm a complete novice at VR, so can someone break it down for me in a way my idiot-man-baby brain can understand? thank you muchly in advance. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
DerekSpeare Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 980ti Derek "BoxxMann" Speare derekspearedesigns.com 25,000+ Gaming Enthusiasts Trust DSD Components to Perform! i7-11700k 4.9g | RTX3080ti (finally!)| 64gb Ram | 2TB NVME PCIE4| Reverb G1 | CH Pro Throt/Fighterstick Pro | 4 DSD Boxes Falcon XT/AT/3.0/4.0 | LB2 | DCS | LOMAC Been Flight Simming Since 1988! Useful VR settings and tips for DCS HERE
dotChuckles Posted August 12, 2016 Author Posted August 12, 2016 What is that based on, value for money or raw frame rates? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Penshoon Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 (edited) The 970 might not be your bottleneck in DCS with VR anyway so I would wait for the rift to arrive and check how it runs first. You will be able to crank up the AA & pixel density more with a gtx 1080 compared to a gtx 1070 as it's faster but you pay a premium for that extra bump graphical horsepower for only a slight increase in "eye candy". You will definitely not gain any better performance (maximum potential fps) with a 1080 compared to a 1070 in DCS as they both will be bottlenecked by your cpu. VR in DCS is very demanding on the CPU. [ame= ] [/ame] Edited August 12, 2016 by Penshoon 1 Otter
dotChuckles Posted August 12, 2016 Author Posted August 12, 2016 That was a really useful video! Very clear. So I could save some money, hit the maximum potential performance with a cheaper card. Food for thought. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
KLR Rico Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 In DCS, the CPU is still the limiting factor for your draw distances, number of units, etc; GPU isn't stressed by these things much. The CPU has to do all the work deciding what to draw, and the GPU just has to render it. In DCS the single biggest factor for GPU load is resolution. The GTX970 can feed the frames to the Rift as fast as the CPU can give them if you keep AA reasonable and pixel density to 1.0, but IMHO the pixel density has a *huge* impact on visual quality with the rift, and this is where you need GPU power. The GPU load increases by the square of the pixel density setting. Pushing it up to 2.0 requires 4x the power as keeping it at 1.0, and even a 1080 struggles here. For the sole reason of being able to push the density as high as possible, I recommend still buying the most GPU power you can afford. i5-4670K@4.5GHz / 16 GB RAM / SSD / GTX1080 Rift CV1 / G-seat / modded FFB HOTAS
hansangb Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 The one thing to consider into the ROI equation is how much VRAM is available on the card. I think we can all agree that the demand is increasing. One of these days, I'll have to try and test how much of my VRAM is being used with XYZ settings. hsb HW Spec in Spoiler --- i7-10700K Direct-To-Die/OC'ed to 5.1GHz, MSI Z490 MB, 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, EVGA 2080 Ti FTW3, NVMe+SSD, Win 10 x64 Pro, MFG, Warthog, TM MFDs, Komodo Huey set, Rverbe G1
Raz_Specter Posted August 13, 2016 Posted August 13, 2016 (edited) A mate of mine has the same system as me, he ordered his CV1 while still having a Gainward GTX970 installed. In DCS he was getting between 20 and 25 FPS, which isn't that great to be honest in the CV1. So he ordered the EVGA 1080 Founder Edition, same as me and is very happy You need that extra power to use Pixel Density, I currently have PD set at 2.0 and this gives, for me, the best resolution for the cockpits and detail Check this Thread out I would certainly recommend getting a 1080 myself. Edited August 13, 2016 by Raz_Specter Custom built W10 Pro 64Bit, Intel Core i9 9900k, Asus ROG Maximus Code XI Z390, 64GB DDR4 3200 RGB, Samsung 1TB NVme M.2 Drive, Gigabyte AORUS 2080TI, 40" Iiyama Display. Wacom Cintiq Pro 24, HOTAS Virpil T50 Stick / FA-18C TM Stick and Virpil T50 Throttle, MFG Crosswind Graphite Pedals. HP Reverb SPECTER [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Lead Terrain Developer / Texture Artist
dotChuckles Posted August 13, 2016 Author Posted August 13, 2016 Thanks guys, VR is a bit of an experiment for me. If it works out then I'll invest some more money in to power. If not I'll see what I can get on ebay for it :-) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
hansangb Posted August 14, 2016 Posted August 14, 2016 Be careful. Once you go VR...there is no going back! hsb HW Spec in Spoiler --- i7-10700K Direct-To-Die/OC'ed to 5.1GHz, MSI Z490 MB, 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, EVGA 2080 Ti FTW3, NVMe+SSD, Win 10 x64 Pro, MFG, Warthog, TM MFDs, Komodo Huey set, Rverbe G1
Gman109 Posted August 14, 2016 Posted August 14, 2016 Are you JUST using your system for DCS with VR? If not, 1080 isn't a bad card, nor the 1070. At all. We maintain 3 or 4 gaming PCs plus a gaming laptop or 2 constantly, and I just went through an upgrade cycle (yearly pretty much) and switched out 980ti SLI for 1080s in 2 systems. In no way shape or form are the 1080s a disappointment or poor cost/performance cards. I think in fact that DCS using VR or SLI with a 1440p/4k Gsync panel is the only place where a 980ti is still reasonably close to the performance of the 1080 cards. I would buy a 1070 over a 980ti right now, you would be crazy not to IMO - lower cost, as good if not better performance in virtually ever game I've tried. Primary DCS System: AMD 9800x3d, MSI Tomahawk 870, 6TB m.2s (2x2t, 1x2tb), MSI Ventus 5080, Seasonic 1200 PSU, 64GB Gskill 6000mhz CL30. 32" Asus 4K OLED 240hz, 49"MSI OLDED Secondary System : 14600KF, z790 Tomahawk, 32GB Gskill 6000mhz CL32, Asus 4090, 2x2TB m.2. VR: Quest 3 for now. Virpil T50x2,T50CM2x2,Warbrd x2, VFX/Delta/Flankr/CM2/Alpha/Tm Hornet sticks, VKB GF3, Tm Warthog(many), Modded Cougar, VKB Pedals/MFG Pedals/Slaw Viper RX+109Cam Pedals/Virpil Pedals x2, Virpil T50+T50CM2+T50+T50CM3+VMAX Throttles/CH Fightersticksx2/CH Throttlesx2/CH peds, Quest 3. Virpil Rotor TCS Plus. All virpil grips, TM Grips, working on VKB GF Grips.
hansangb Posted August 14, 2016 Posted August 14, 2016 DAMN!! That's a lot of horsepower! hsb HW Spec in Spoiler --- i7-10700K Direct-To-Die/OC'ed to 5.1GHz, MSI Z490 MB, 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, EVGA 2080 Ti FTW3, NVMe+SSD, Win 10 x64 Pro, MFG, Warthog, TM MFDs, Komodo Huey set, Rverbe G1
Recommended Posts