Hummingbird Posted September 11, 2016 Posted September 11, 2016 Just wondering wether the F-5's flight model has been fixed since this announcement by Belsimtek?: Known DCS F-5E bugs and inconsistencies: IDLE RPM (Thrust) vs altitude. IDLE thrust too big at altitude. Damaged aircraft without one wing sink smoothly. No spin after tail slide. According to TO, when tailsliding with pitch > 70 degrees the plane should enter inverted spin. Choсks animation linked to canopy animation on net phantom Turn perfomance at 5000ft. Sustained turn curve has no step on 330 KIAS. No compressor stall and flameout. Max lift g-loads. According to TO at 5000 ft and GW 13750 the F-5 can achieve 6.0 G at M = 0.5. In simulator the plane can achieve 6.6 at M=0.5 and 7.1 at M = 0.52.
joey45 Posted September 11, 2016 Posted September 11, 2016 What's wrong with it? The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
Harpoon Posted September 13, 2016 Posted September 13, 2016 What's wrong with it? You aren't implying that there's nothing wrong with the bugs that Chizh listed, right? Of course I have no quarrel with the current flight modelling, but some others, such as the OP, might. To Hummingbird: I do wonder when Chizh posted that, however. Fixes come in due time, especially with a beta module that may have other problems with higher priority. The best trick to make time fly faster is to either forget the problem for the most part and live with it, or have an even higher degree of patience for the developer (not saying you have a low amount). The essential part is to not dwell on it. If you want to talk to anyone about anything personal, send it to their PM box. Interpersonal drama and ad hominem rebuttal are things that do not belong on a thread viewed by the public. One thing i have to point out... naming a thread.. "OK, so" is as useful as tits on a bull.
nomdeplume Posted September 13, 2016 Posted September 13, 2016 I do wonder when Chizh posted that, however. It was from the DCS changelog for the initial release of the module at the end of July.
Harpoon Posted September 14, 2016 Posted September 14, 2016 It was from the DCS changelog for the initial release of the module at the end of July. Thanks. If you want to talk to anyone about anything personal, send it to their PM box. Interpersonal drama and ad hominem rebuttal are things that do not belong on a thread viewed by the public. One thing i have to point out... naming a thread.. "OK, so" is as useful as tits on a bull.
Recommended Posts