Jhuss96 Posted January 21, 2018 Posted January 21, 2018 Hey guys, I just ordered a 1440p monitor to replace a dying 1080p one I have. I run an i7 4790k, msi gtx 970 & 16 gb of ram, would this be good enough to run dcs on 1440p? If not what would be the most beneficial thing to upgrade? Looking to run smoothly when 2.5 releases :D Thanks Intel i7-4790K 4GHz l 32 GB DDR3 l MSI 1080ti l Gigabyte 97ZX l TrackIR + DelanClip l TM Warthog HOTAS l CH Pedals AV-8B l AJS-37 l A-10A l A-10C l F-15C l F-16C l F-5E l F-14A/B l F-86F l F/A-18C l Hawk l M2000 l MiG 29 l NTTR l Persian Gulf l Su-27 l Su-33 l Su-25 l Supercarrier l L-39 l UH-1 l
Guest Posted January 21, 2018 Posted January 21, 2018 Hey guys, I just ordered a 1440p monitor to replace a dying 1080p one I have. I run an i7 4790k, msi gtx 970 & 16 gb of ram, would this be good enough to run dcs on 1440p? If not what would be the most beneficial thing to upgrade? Looking to run smoothly when 2.5 releases :D Thanks Trust me, get a 1070. With that i7 you'll rock. 1
Jhuss96 Posted January 21, 2018 Author Posted January 21, 2018 Trust me, get a 1070. With that i7 you'll rock. Thanks for the suggestion. I do some research on them:joystick: Intel i7-4790K 4GHz l 32 GB DDR3 l MSI 1080ti l Gigabyte 97ZX l TrackIR + DelanClip l TM Warthog HOTAS l CH Pedals AV-8B l AJS-37 l A-10A l A-10C l F-15C l F-16C l F-5E l F-14A/B l F-86F l F/A-18C l Hawk l M2000 l MiG 29 l NTTR l Persian Gulf l Su-27 l Su-33 l Su-25 l Supercarrier l L-39 l UH-1 l
Guest Posted January 21, 2018 Posted January 21, 2018 Thanks for the suggestion. I do some research on them:joystick: I had same setup as you, with gtx 970. I kept my 4790k and upgraded to an Aorus GTX 1070. I sold my 970 and put extra money to get the 1070, for the difference I spent I got way much more performance. Nevada is a piece of cake now :D
Pilotasso Posted January 21, 2018 Posted January 21, 2018 My old GTX 970 was running DCS in 1440p just fine. You are not required to replace it, even though there would be definitely a difference in performance. .
Johnny_Rico Posted January 21, 2018 Posted January 21, 2018 sweet, 3440 x 1440 gaming is excellent, welcome to the club METAR weather for DCS World missions Guide to help out new DCS MOOSE Users -> HERE Havoc Company Dedicated server info Connect IP: 94.23.215.203 SRS enabled - freqs - Main = 243, A2A = 244, A2G = 245 Please contact me HERE if you have any server feedback or METAR issues/requests
ViperDriver Posted January 28, 2018 Posted January 28, 2018 Hello Could you please post a screenshot from your graphic settings? I would like to compare your settings as I play DCS in 3440 x 1600 with a GTX 1080 but graphic looks not so good and the FPS are very low. Thank you guys
Django Posted January 29, 2018 Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) I was considering a 1080Ti for my next build but not convinced about the current generation of VR hardware, so I'm looking at the 1070. Would the 1070 be good enough for a multi monitor setup at 1440p in DCS 2.5? Edited January 29, 2018 by Django Regards, Django. | BMS | DCS OB | A-10C II | AV-8B | F-16C | F/A-18C | FC3 | Persian Gulf | Supercarrier | Tacview | XP11 | FF A320 | FF 757 | | I7-9700K + NH-D15 | RTX3080Ti 12GB | DDR4-3200 16GB | Aorus Z390 Ultra | 2X Evo 860 1TB | 850W | Torrent Case | | Warthog HOTAS + CH Pedals | 32" TV 1080p 60Hz | TrackIR5 |
BitMaster Posted January 29, 2018 Posted January 29, 2018 My 980 did a good job @ 1440, the 970 should not be much lesser. You can try mid-to-high settings, that should work, 2x MSAA is plenty at 1440p, 16x ASF should be ok, water medium maybe, civ. traffic off too maybe, blurr as you like, visibility is a VRAM thing too, so maybe HIGH as max, further up may stutter. Try, one by one, always same airframe, always same scene, so you can compare. Different airframes have different results, some give me 65 fps where others have 100+, so dont take one model as a "fixed" thing, it goes up and dow with fps depending in which cockpit you are sitting. Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Sapphire Nitro+ 7800XT - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus XG27ACG QHD 180Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X
=Pedro= Posted January 29, 2018 Posted January 29, 2018 My old GTX 970 was running DCS in 1440p just fine. You are not required to replace it, even though there would be definitely a difference in performance. Settings mid/high, 60 fps, MP "dynamic campaign" with 40 players on the server ? 1440 not possible (only if you don't mind 30-50 fps and stuttering). Gigabyte Z390 Gaming X | i7 9700K@5.0GHz | Asus TUF OC RTX 4090 | 32GB DDR4@3200MHz | HP Reverb G2 | TrackIR 5 | TM Warthog HOTAS | MFG Croswinds
Repsol2k Posted January 29, 2018 Posted January 29, 2018 I think your 970 has 4gb of Video Ram or ? The 1070 offers u a 8Gb V Ram. For simulations a high VRam is in my opinion essential. The Video Card need to have many textures and objects in his pipe so that u dont get stuttering when it reloads stuff. I have also an 1440p Monitor and took me quite a while with a 1070 to get smooth lag free 60FPS with average DCS Settings. Maybe my thread about how i get to that can help u a bit. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=200623
The LT Posted February 1, 2018 Posted February 1, 2018 These days, there is only one spec. And it's called 1080Ti. :) My controls & seat Main controls: , BRD-N v4 Flightstick (Kreml C5 controller), TM Warthog Throttle (Kreml F3 controller), BRD-F2 Restyling Bf-109 Pedals w. damper, TrackIR5, Gametrix KW-908 (integrated into RAV4 seat) Stick grips: Thrustmaster Warthog Thrustmaster Cougar (x2) Thrustmaster F-16 FLCS BRD KG13 Standby controls: BRD-M2 Mi-8 Pedals (Ruddermaster controller) BRD-N v3 Flightstick w. exch. grip upgrade (Kreml C5 controller) Thrustmaster Cougar Throttle Pilot seat
David OC Posted February 1, 2018 Posted February 1, 2018 I think your 970 has 4gb of Video Ram or ? The 1070 offers u a 8Gb V Ram. For simulations a high VRam is in my opinion essential. The Video Card need to have many textures and objects in his pipe so that u dont get stuttering when it reloads stuff. I have also an 1440p Monitor and took me quite a while with a 1070 to get smooth lag free 60FPS with average DCS Settings. Maybe my thread about how i get to that can help u a bit. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=200623 mmm, what CPU / RAM you running Repsol2k? The only time I run at 60 fps, is very low the middle of Vegas on very high settings. Here are my base settings for Normany. Not test any of this in 2.5, will be doing some flights later tonight, will see how it goes. . i7-7700K OC @ 5Ghz | ASUS IX Hero MB | ASUS GTX 1080 Ti STRIX | 32GB Corsair 3000Mhz | Corsair H100i V2 Radiator | Samsung 960 EVO M.2 NVMe 500G SSD | Samsung 850 EVO 500G SSD | Corsair HX850i Platinum 850W | Oculus Rift | ASUS PG278Q 27-inch, 2560 x 1440, G-SYNC, 144Hz, 1ms | VKB Gunfighter Pro Chuck's DCS Tutorial Library Download PDF Tutorial guides to help get up to speed with aircraft quickly and also great for taking a good look at the aircraft available for DCS before purchasing. Link
Jhuss96 Posted February 1, 2018 Author Posted February 1, 2018 Thanks for all the responses everyone. I'm looking at upgrading my hardware within the next few weeks. So just to recap is the 1070 the best gpu option for the i7 4790k? I'm not planning on upgrading my processor (would rather not get a whole new motherboard). I already have 16gb of ram & I'm planning on getting 16 more to get up to 32gb. Now I'm just looking for the gpu that will give me the best performance in 1440p. I've read some forums saying some better gpus like the 1080ti would bottleneck with a 4790k. But I'm honestly not techie enough to fully understand which gpus are too much for my processor. Intel i7-4790K 4GHz l 32 GB DDR3 l MSI 1080ti l Gigabyte 97ZX l TrackIR + DelanClip l TM Warthog HOTAS l CH Pedals AV-8B l AJS-37 l A-10A l A-10C l F-15C l F-16C l F-5E l F-14A/B l F-86F l F/A-18C l Hawk l M2000 l MiG 29 l NTTR l Persian Gulf l Su-27 l Su-33 l Su-25 l Supercarrier l L-39 l UH-1 l
David OC Posted February 2, 2018 Posted February 2, 2018 (edited) If you can afford the 1080ti I would go with that, Would the 1080ti be waiting for the 4790K, I would say the 4790K should be enough to keep up with the 1080ti, DCS is using the GPU much more now, and if you want to get into VR, the 1070 is OK for VR, 1080ti is recommended and will be my next upgrade soon, I was just waiting to see anything about VR 2.0. My build was built with the overall throughput in mind. The 1080ti is the missing piece..;) . Edited February 2, 2018 by David OC i7-7700K OC @ 5Ghz | ASUS IX Hero MB | ASUS GTX 1080 Ti STRIX | 32GB Corsair 3000Mhz | Corsair H100i V2 Radiator | Samsung 960 EVO M.2 NVMe 500G SSD | Samsung 850 EVO 500G SSD | Corsair HX850i Platinum 850W | Oculus Rift | ASUS PG278Q 27-inch, 2560 x 1440, G-SYNC, 144Hz, 1ms | VKB Gunfighter Pro Chuck's DCS Tutorial Library Download PDF Tutorial guides to help get up to speed with aircraft quickly and also great for taking a good look at the aircraft available for DCS before purchasing. Link
BitMaster Posted February 2, 2018 Posted February 2, 2018 I'd get the 1080Ti if you can afford it. the 1070 is ok, it's fast too, but only half as fast as a Ti. I'd now buy a FE and put a wc block on it, cheaper, just as fast, 0dB...and available usually. Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Sapphire Nitro+ 7800XT - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus XG27ACG QHD 180Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X
karkka Posted February 2, 2018 Posted February 2, 2018 (edited) I´ve just download and tried DCS 2,5, I have the spec in my signature. and I have around 70-120 FPS in Instant action mode. Monitor, AOC Agon AG271QG G-sync IPS 1440p 165hz My settings, Maybe someone could tell how to improve. https://imgur.com/a/CebmL Edited February 2, 2018 by karkka Windows 10 pro 64bit | Intel I7 4790K@ 4GHz | 24GB Crucial ballistix sport 1600MHz DDR3 | ASUS Strix GTX1080Ti OC | Crucial mx 100 250Gb SSD | Crucial mx 300 520Gb SSD "Game disc"| Samsung 1Tb HDD |
BitMaster Posted February 3, 2018 Posted February 3, 2018 Take VSYNC off, you are running GSYNC dont you !? ASF to 16x is best imho MSAA 4x does cost performance but looks nice, Off is more fluent imho. 24GB should allow max Preload oc your CPU if you can. YOur GPU will likely not run 100% with the 4790k at stock settings. Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Sapphire Nitro+ 7800XT - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus XG27ACG QHD 180Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X
Repsol2k Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 mmm, what CPU / RAM you running Repsol2k? The only time I run at 60 fps, is very low the middle of Vegas on very high settings. Here are my base settings for Normany. Not test any of this in 2.5, will be doing some flights later tonight, will see how it goes. . Im running a i7 7700k with 4.6GhZ and Ram i have Corsair Vengeance 32Gb @ 2666MhZ With 2.5 i can push all up with deferred shading except the MSAA which i run at Off atm and use therefore Nvidia's FXAA and Object Shadows are on Flat cause with Standard i got flickering shadows. Doenst look as good as MSAA 2x or 4x but it gives me a wonderfull smooth lag free picture at 60FPS. Also i have VSync enabled cause i have a FreeSync Monitor with a Nvidia Card so no GSync or FreeSync would work. Only problem which accours with 2.5 is the Multiplayer behaviour which isnt as smooth as singleplayer but playable without a problem. And we have a BETA so we can cross the fingers that after the touch ups of ED we will get better results in a Final/Release version.
karkka Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 Take VSYNC off, you are running GSYNC dont you !? ASF to 16x is best imho MSAA 4x does cost performance but looks nice, Off is more fluent imho. 24GB should allow max Preload oc your CPU if you can. YOur GPU will likely not run 100% with the 4790k at stock settings. Yes I have g-sync on. So should I always have v-sync off in every game and Nvidia control panel? Windows 10 pro 64bit | Intel I7 4790K@ 4GHz | 24GB Crucial ballistix sport 1600MHz DDR3 | ASUS Strix GTX1080Ti OC | Crucial mx 100 250Gb SSD | Crucial mx 300 520Gb SSD "Game disc"| Samsung 1Tb HDD |
Recommended Posts