Bearskin Posted February 23, 2019 Posted February 23, 2019 My current rig, MVF, 3770k @ 4.4, GTX970, 16 gig RAM, 27" 1080p 144Hz monitor. DCS world default high settings with view set to ultra. The SU27 mission I am getting around 90FPS, the free flight Huey over the Vegas strip is down to 45 FPS (CPU 24%, GPU 99%). I have looked on youtube for benches but for DCS 2.5, I only seem to find 4k with VR or XX80 / ti videos. So for DCS world is a 8GB card better (1070) or will a 2060 / 1660ti 6GB do the same job. I have seen all the bench videos of the 2060 equalling the 1080 / 1070ti but is 8 GB better for DCS. Thanks for reading Z790, 13700K, RTX4080, 32 gig RAM, Warthog, WarBRD base , Virpil Pedals, Pico 4
dburne Posted February 23, 2019 Posted February 23, 2019 More is always better imho. Don B EVGA Z390 Dark MB | i9 9900k CPU @ 5.1 GHz | Gigabyte 4090 OC | 64 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 MHz CL16 | Corsair H150i Pro Cooler |Virpil CM3 Stick w/ Alpha Prime Grip 200mm ext| Virpil CM3 Throttle | VPC Rotor TCS Base w/ Alpha-L Grip| Point Control V2|Varjo Aero|
BitMaster Posted February 23, 2019 Posted February 23, 2019 More is better. It mainly depends on your screen resolution. People with 16GB cards already report 14+GB VRAM usage, so paint your pic. Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Sapphire Nitro+ 7800XT - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus XG27ACG QHD 180Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X
Recommended Posts