pepin1234 Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 (edited) Every time I lock a target unlock itself back again Edit: from 10km constantly unlock in MP. The tactics are using the new modules against this are very silly. We already do not get solid lock at WVR. Wow the Mig-29 is becoming the most nasty fighter ever. Even the new AFM seem very weird. Edited March 28, 2019 by pepin1234 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
FoxAlfa Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 That is happening if you are locking AI with a jammer at more target at the more then burn trough range ~45km. AI can turn on instantly the jammer to brake your lock. ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery
pepin1234 Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 (edited) That is happening if you are locking AI with a jammer at more target at the more then burn trough range ~45km. AI can turn on instantly the jammer to brake your lock. no look above. I am talking inside 10km and afterburner on the target. all the shoot down against me have been made with Aim-120 within 6km (after been defeated all Aim-120 with high Gs maneuvers) with no option to me to get a solid lock with vertical scanner. even when the target is afterburner on. The target keep doing notching maneuver even inside 20km they can feel confident enough to do this against a RU fighter to face in a silly way the R-27 and R-77. and even known they are inside 15km they face the nose toward The RU fighter... The worst part of this history the last option left for Mig is the vertical scanning combined with radar and event this does not work. KEEP all the time unlocking!! locking and back unlocking all this downgrades have been introduced after F-18 went on sale. Edited March 28, 2019 by pepin1234 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Ironhand Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 Have you checked to see if the same issues exist in SP? If they don’t, then nothing has been “degraded” (bug introduced) to the MiG-29 systems themselves. There seems to be something broken between the aircraft systems and some of the online coding YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU1...CR6IZ7crfdZxDg _____ Win 11 Pro x64, Asrock Z790 Steel Legend MoBo, Intel i7-13700K, MSI RKT 4070 Super 12GB, Corsair Dominator DDR5 RAM 32GB.
pepin1234 Posted March 29, 2019 Author Posted March 29, 2019 Have you checked to see if the same issues exist in SP? If they don’t, then nothing has been “degraded” (bug introduced) to the MiG-29 systems themselves. There seems to be something broken between the aircraft systems and some of the online coding I will keep doing my tests. But just to be honest when the target do those things against another in a simulator like this, it is because they already made their Tacview test and get the conclusion what they do is the key... :thumbup: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
FoxAlfa Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 It could be related to the issue I reported... https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3854530&postcount=104 ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery
Recommended Posts