Airhunter Posted August 13, 2019 Posted August 13, 2019 So, since a couple updates the RB24J is smokeless and the RB74 is now smoky and shows up as an AIM-9M in game, while it technically should be an AIM-9L. I hope this gets fixed soon as the most viable missile now has a smoketrail that is super easy to spot.
Airhunter Posted August 19, 2019 Author Posted August 19, 2019 So, could the RB74 models simply be replaced by the AIM9L model, since its in the game already? Also, RB24J's need to be smoky and 74's reduced smoke as per real life.
Airhunter Posted October 12, 2019 Author Posted October 12, 2019 Can this finally be adressed by someone? Heatseekers have been broken/wrong for a while now. The RB24J flies like an AIM-9L and is smokeless while the RB-74 flies like the AIM-9J and smokes, which should be quite the other way around. RB74 is also reduced smoke, like the 9L.
QuiGon Posted October 14, 2019 Posted October 14, 2019 I wish there would be an IronMike for the Viggen too... :( Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
IronMike Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Got your pm bud, I'll make sure we take a look at it. We actually adjusted both missiles to be as they should with Jedi and Ragnar quite a while ago (last year), so it surprises me to see that this now happens. Flight behavior should be still correct though, yes? Only visible representation? Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
QuiGon Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 (edited) Got your pm bud, I'll make sure we take a look at it. We actually adjusted both missiles to be as they should with Jedi and Ragnar quite a while ago (last year), so it surprises me to see that this now happens. Flight behavior should be still correct though, yes? Only visible representation? I haven't noticed any inaccuracies with the flight model, but I'm no expert in this. The RB-24 seems to still be rear aspect only, so that seems to be correct as well, unlike the smoke behaviour. Edited October 31, 2019 by QuiGon Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
Airhunter Posted October 31, 2019 Author Posted October 31, 2019 Got your pm bud, I'll make sure we take a look at it. We actually adjusted both missiles to be as they should with Jedi and Ragnar quite a while ago (last year), so it surprises me to see that this now happens. Flight behavior should be still correct though, yes? Only visible representation? Flight behaviour yes, only visually it looks off or has lack of or too much smoke. If you need any help with testing and stuff I'd be happy to assist.
Airhunter Posted December 20, 2019 Author Posted December 20, 2019 FIXED as of the latest OB (20th DEC 19). Thank you very much Heatblur! :thumbup:
MYSE1234 Posted March 20, 2020 Posted March 20, 2020 RB74 is back to being super smokey with this beta update. Viggen is love. Viggen is life. 7800X3D | RTX 4070 Ti S | 64GB 6000MHz RAM |
Airhunter Posted March 27, 2020 Author Posted March 27, 2020 +1 Bug has appeared again. Can you specify? To clarify, the 74's should be 9L's visually and do smoke and the 24J's should be aim 9J's and smoke even more.
Schmidtfire Posted March 28, 2020 Posted March 28, 2020 Yes, you are right. Rb74 = 9L = smoke. We're good here. No bug. My confusion since we have seen both smoke and smokeless.
Airhunter Posted March 29, 2020 Author Posted March 29, 2020 Yes, you are right. Rb74 = 9L = smoke. We're good here. No bug. My confusion since we have seen both smoke and smokeless. Yes, they were smokeless in the past, which was wrong. Then the smoke got flipped with the 9J's. ALL GOOD: :thumbup:
Recommended Posts