Boberro Posted May 15, 2009 Posted May 15, 2009 Wow nuclear FABs :D 1 Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
Namenlos Ein Posted May 15, 2009 Posted May 15, 2009 I think this evidence of Ka-50's possibility to deliver a nuclear weapon can put the end to whole program because of some international agreements about WoMD. But I want it in DCS! And I don't mean the nukes, of course. I want that new targeting system instead of 'Shkval'. I hope (just hope!), that system equipped with a 'night channel' (FLIR). 1
topol-m Posted May 16, 2009 Posted May 16, 2009 Speaking on nukes why don`t we have nukes in FC? At least the bombers should be able to use them. Any chance to see them in DCS: fighters add-ons? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Grimes Posted May 16, 2009 Posted May 16, 2009 Speaking on nukes why don`t we have nukes in FC? At least the bombers should be able to use them. Any chance to see them in DCS: fighters add-ons? What would be the point? Outside of the visuals there would be point gameplay wise to include it. The right man in the wrong place makes all the difference in the world. Current Projects: Grayflag Server, Scripting Wiki Useful Links: Mission Scripting Tools MIST-(GitHub) MIST-(Thread) SLMOD, Wiki wishlist, Mission Editing Wiki!, Mission Building Forum
Boberro Posted May 16, 2009 Posted May 16, 2009 Speaking on nukes why don`t we have nukes in FC? At least the bombers should be able to use them. Any chance to see them in DCS: fighters add-ons? I would like to see nuclear in DCS. I don't think in Lo it is possible cos it is really a bit difficult to model correct atomic explosion which affects on near buildings, forests ect, but in DCS.... At least Russia has them thousands, so more than few R-77 :D Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
topol-m Posted May 16, 2009 Posted May 16, 2009 What would be the point? Outside of the visuals there would be point gameplay wise to include it. The point would be making the campaign more dinamic. Including bombers armed with small nukes will make them highest priority targets which if not shot down can have bigger impact on the campaign progress... I`m not saying they should drop nukes on every mission but it should be great to have several missions where you should escort a bomber to deliver its lovely present behind enemy lines, or to shoot down one before it turns your airbase into barbecue :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
wickedpenguin Posted June 1, 2009 Posted June 1, 2009 Wow - the KA-52 is a beautiful machine. The KA-50 falls under the "it's so ugly it's evil-looking" category, like the Mi-28. The Alligator is actually a good-looking helicopter. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
topol-m Posted June 2, 2009 Posted June 2, 2009 Hello everyone. Does anyone know who is the wolfdog that appears in her last video? I guess its an Arimminum but im not sure. What is clear is that the CZW is much more beautiful than Laura What the :huh: are you talking about? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Kirai Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 AH-64 APACHE has always been my favorite by the looks but when I saw the pictures of the KA-52 I don't know anymore cause it's freaking beautiful :) Go Ugly Early
nscode Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 I think this evidence of Ka-50's possibility to deliver a nuclear weapon can put the end to whole program because of some international agreements about WoMD. No, it can't. You simply remove the possibility. Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us.
AlexHunter Posted November 3, 2012 Posted November 3, 2012 http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCUQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftvcs2011.technicalvision.ru%2Freports%2F15.03.11%2F14.30.ppt&ei=MX-QUKz2MuL7iwLl94DwAg&usg=AFQjCNHtnVPKXsM-P305v_LyQqRlG2taCA Открылась бездна звезд полна; Звездам числа нет, бездне дна. (М. В. Ломоносов)
marcos Posted November 3, 2012 Posted November 3, 2012 No, it can't. You simply remove the possibility. Why would anyone choose to deliver a nuke by helicopter anyway? Aside from the difficulties of getting away in time, it has to be the slowest, most interceptable delivery method.
Erforce Posted November 5, 2012 Posted November 5, 2012 Damn thoses Helmets ! Damn this 3y+ thread resurrection ! Oh, well, i like warlocks anyway. just saying ;) TASK / ROLES acronyms guide Black Shark A.I. datalink guide illustrated (v1.2.4 Available on Wiki) DCS World Codex 1.1 : full units list (Speed/Weapons/Armor thickness/Threat zone/Weapon damage...) (Oct 2013) BlackShark 2 1.2.x Bug and glitches thread (v1.2.7)
Recommended Posts