DarkStar79 Posted March 22, 2021 Posted March 22, 2021 Shouldnt the RB-75T do more damage then the RB-75 and RB-75-B? When killing shelters and other ground units and such the RB-75T do less damage? Shouldnt the RB-75T be equal to the AGM-65F on the Harrier? Is this a bug or?
BonerCat Posted March 22, 2021 Posted March 22, 2021 Damage to ground units in general is off by a wide margin I've seen Abrams tanks take a C-802 AKG (150+ Kg's warheads) to the front armor and live without taking any damage whatsoever, but at the same time, an Sa-19 Tunguska can kill an Abrams (admittedly from the back) with 2 of it's missiles (9kg warheads) Not to mention ships... Point being, ground unit damage models are a bit scuffed in general at the moment, and that's on ED 1 Modules: F-14, F-15C, F-16C, F/A-18C, M-2000C, A-10C, A-10C II, AV-8B N/A, MiG-29, Su-33, MiG-21 Bis, F-5E, P-51D, Ka-50, Mi-8, Sa 342, UH-1H, Combined Arms Maps and others: Persian Gulf, Syria, Normandy, WWII Assets, NS 430 + Mi-8 NS 430
DarkStar79 Posted March 22, 2021 Author Posted March 22, 2021 2 hours ago, BonerCat said: Damage to ground units in general is off by a wide margin I've seen Abrams tanks take a C-802 AKG (150+ Kg's warheads) to the front armor and live without taking any damage whatsoever, but at the same time, an Sa-19 Tunguska can kill an Abrams (admittedly from the back) with 2 of it's missiles (9kg warheads) Not to mention ships... Point being, ground unit damage models are a bit scuffed in general at the moment, and that's on ED Yes i know that, its just that it have been like this now for several years, that RB-75T do less dmg. Just want to know if its being worked on somehow? Maybe HB can clarify this?
Recommended Posts