legitscoper Posted June 3, 2022 Posted June 3, 2022 (edited) Hello, I always was flying for several years at 100% RPM, and never wondering why the range is so low. I've spent many hours doing tests, and came to conclusion, that if taking typical SEAD loadout, it is the best to keep RPM at 93% when going at altitude 2000m. Interesting thing is, that going slower than like 90% is also making flying less efficient. Here is the excel file I made, maybe someone will find it useful. DCS SU-25T Fuel efficiency table.xlsx Edited June 3, 2022 by legitscoper 1 6 - legitscoper My specs: Windows 8.1 Laptop Lenovo Y50 intel core i7 Nvidia GTX 860M, 8gb RAM, 275GB SSD
Rudel_chw Posted June 3, 2022 Posted June 3, 2022 Very well done, thanks for sharing .. can't imagine how many flying hours are behind those curves You should have placed your nickname somewhere on the document, as author. I added it as a suffix to the filename, so that in the future I don't forget who made it. Cheers. 1 For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
Jascha Posted June 3, 2022 Posted June 3, 2022 I use 100% RPM only during takeoff and combat. For cruise - usually 90%, but I turn it up a notch, thanks.
legitscoper Posted June 3, 2022 Author Posted June 3, 2022 3 hours ago, Rudel_chw said: Very well done, thanks for sharing .. can't imagine how many flying hours are behind those curves You should have placed your nickname somewhere on the document, as author. I added it as a suffix to the filename, so that in the future I don't forget who made it. Cheers. Sure, I can edit the file - legitscoper My specs: Windows 8.1 Laptop Lenovo Y50 intel core i7 Nvidia GTX 860M, 8gb RAM, 275GB SSD
Recommended Posts