Does implemented RCS good enough ? How about CHAFF effectiveness!

[Raviar]

I dont see much a diffrence of Detecting, locking and firing of SA-2 against Tiger, Viper and Hornet

Tacview-20220907-170302-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-165846-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-165406-DCS.zip.acmi

[BIGNEWY]

Tacviews are not good for bug reporting, we need to see track replays for debugging. 

If you want me to highlight something to the team please provide a track replay example. 

Please also keep bug reports to one post, no need to make extra posts for the same issue.

thanks

[Raviar]

2 hours ago, BIGNEWY said:

Tacviews are not good for bug reporting, we need to see track replays for debugging. 

If you want me to highlight something to the team please provide a track replay example. 

Please also keep bug reports to one post, no need to make extra posts for the same issue.

thanks

Thanks for reply, that was my mistake, i had to put it in general, it was more of a question

[Exorcet]

Try the F-117

Speaking of RCS though, DCS seems to model the RCS of a clean aircraft, and only an average value. It might be worth looking into increases these values for aircraft that typically carry external stores, if not completely revamping the RCS model.

Edited September 7, 2022 by Exorcet

[Raviar]

13 hours ago, Exorcet said:

Try the F-117

Speaking of RCS though, DCS seems to model the RCS of a clean aircraft, and only an average value. It might be worth looking into increases these values for aircraft that typically carry external stores, if not completely revamping the RCS model.

 

the F-117 is an AI, I saw this picture before and as you know it is generated base on DCS which is not correct, the RCS of the F-5 from 50s cant be as same as F-16 Block 50! that the my point , I dont think if the chaff cartridges are the same as well! 
To me, the focus of the ED is all about A/A and Active Missile, as we can see the improvement of AIM-120C-5 over 4 years! but how about these core important details !