Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I hear that the aim-120 sucks in the demo? did the devs nurf the aim-120? I hope it's just not modeled well in the demo since it wasn't ment to be used in the demo.

 

anyways, in the demo the r-77 is better then the aim-120 so I hear.

Posted

The Demo isn't the full add-on. At least wait until it comes out before putting it down. Since the demo contains only the Su-25 and A-10 and the A-10 doesn't carry the AIM-120.......... you get my drift. :wink:

Asus ROG Strix B-560-F, Intel i9-11900k, EVGA GTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra, Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 PC4-24000, 1TB WD Blue SN550 NVME SSD, Asus PB287Q 28" 3840x2160 TN 4K, Thrustmaster Warthog + F/A-18 HOTAS, Thrustmaster MFD Cougar, Thrustmaster TFRP rudder, Razer orbweaver chroma.

The artist formerly known as VVS 504 Wolverine.

Posted

you guys read past the part about aim-120 sucks? cause when I did it said that It's probably not correct since this is a demo and it wasn't ment to be used in the demo :roll:

 

anyways I went ahead and tested it. aim-120 tends to loose speed quicker then the r-77.

Posted
you guys read past the part about aim-120 sucks? cause when I did it said that It's probably not correct since this is a demo and it wasn't ment to be used in the demo :roll:

 

anyways I went ahead and tested it. aim-120 tends to loose speed quicker then the r-77.

 

The R77 is a better missile ;) plain and simple I would have thought :twisted:

 

Mizzy

Guest ruggbutt
Posted

The grid style control surfaces on the R77 cause more drag than the 120.

Guest ruggbutt
Posted

They supposedly help the missile w/better maneuverability than the 120.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...