Jump to content

Khost : missing airplane runway


Go to solution Solved by Minsky,

Recommended Posts

  • Solution
Posted
3 hours ago, f-18hornet said:

Hi guys, this is not a bug.

Hi, thanks for your response!

I am aware that both airfields have unpaved runways.

In DCS, however, it looks like a bug because the blurry satellite photo that goes as a "runway" doesn't match the rest of the aerodrome neither in pattern or in quality. And the taxiways are abruptly cut without any transition.

Maybe try making runway more pronounced by adding a semi-transparent detail overlay? And/or make aprons and taxiways semi-transparent, so their underlying photo background could better blend with the runway.

  • Like 4

Dima | My DCS uploads

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Was it ever paved (was it paved when the Soviets were there, or did they just use it unpaved too?)

If it was paved when the Soviets were there, it should be paved:

From the ED store description:

Quote

Few war zones have ever seen more A-10C, AH-64D, F-16C, F/A-18C, CH-47F, Mi-24P, Mi-8MTV2, and Su-25 sorties than this.

Everyone using it as a Soviet era map has to live with the fact that the map is really modelling the times while the US & its allies were there, if the runway was paved when the Soviets were there this could be a nod to the fact that the 'war on terror' isn't the only war that's ever been fought there.

  • Like 1

Cheers.

Posted

It has nothing to do with the soviets, nods, and whatever.

The map represents a more or less modern Afghanistan, when runways at both airfields were unpaved.

And so they should remain unpaved in DCS.

The problem is purely aesthetic: the current "unpavedness" looks hideous and distracting.

  • Like 1

Dima | My DCS uploads

Posted (edited)

There are actually two airports in that area, and we only have the top right one in DCS (without the tarmac), which is actually not in use anymore. But the other one is operational since 2021. It is called Khost International Airport. I think would be cool to have them both.

image.png

image.png

image.png

 

--

About the other smaller "airport" which is nearby Khost airport which is Khost Heliport, it's actually named as Salerno Airport. Would be good to rename it.

--

Link to two still active airpoirts (the old one we actually have its not in use anymore): https://skyvector.com/airports/Afghanistan/Khost

Edited by skywalker22
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Minsky said:

It has nothing to do with the soviets, nods, and whatever.

The map represents a more or less modern Afghanistan, when runways at both airfields were unpaved.

And so they should remain unpaved in DCS.

The problem is purely aesthetic: the current "unpavedness" looks hideous and distracting.

It has everything to do with the Soviets. This used to be a Russian airbase. There are still 22 abandoned AN-26 aircrafts "parked" at the side of the runway.

I'm sure the runway had been paved as usual Russian runways, with huge plates, which you can still see on the parking lots of this airport.

image.png

image.png

 

Would be cool to have the whole runway paved with those huge plates.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, skywalker22 said:

I think would be cool to have them both.

The map is set about ten years earlier, Khost International wasn't there back then.

20 minutes ago, skywalker22 said:

It has everything to do with the Soviets.

...

I'm sure the runway had been paved as usual Russian runways, with huge plates

Well, if that knowledge will help them to make runways, taxiways and aprons a closer match to materials used by the soviets, then sure.

Edited by Minsky
  • Like 1

Dima | My DCS uploads

Posted

Was the runway paved, or just the taxiways? Soviets were no strangers to rough field operations. Most Soviet aircraft, especially civilian ones, could use dirt runways, because that's all you get in most "airports" in Russian Far East.

Whatever the case, the locals probably stole the plates as soon as the Soviets moved out. 🙂 

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...