FeoFUN Posted August 6, 2009 Posted August 6, 2009 (edited) SR-71, of-course - 3-4 hours of flight time from Moscow and i'm at teh Times Square!..or underneath of it...in the small crater...lol :D Edited August 6, 2009 by FeoFUN
nscode Posted August 6, 2009 Posted August 6, 2009 But don't forget to add 3 hours that you have to sit in the cockpit after landing, before it cools down enough that you can get out :) Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us.
Vault Posted August 6, 2009 Posted August 6, 2009 You have good taste Zakobi, she's a beautiful aircraft isn't she. For me the fullback is the most aesthetically pleasing aircraft ever to of graced the skies... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Boberro Posted August 6, 2009 Posted August 6, 2009 Oh man! I can't believe that You wrote this! You're playing too much Falcon! Nooo :P I play it too rarely :P Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
Weta43 Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 Su-34 Because it has a galley, bed & toilet ? Cheers.
vrv Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 MiG-25: Because I could get to where I am going extremely fast but not so fast that I won't completely miss the scenery. Imagine buzzing the highway with a MiG-25 at full stretch. Ka-50: I would love to fly her to work and back. I wouldn't have to worry about traffic and it would probably scare the crap out of everyone on the road. F-14D: Aviator glasses. Squadron Jacket. Kenny Lodgins. Corny Haircut. And a callsign. Why not? I would fly balls to the wall everywhere with "Highway to the Danger Zone" blaring from my custom made speakers that are on the bottom. You could hear me coming from a mile away because I wouldn't venture above 1,000 meters LOL. Mi-24: It would go along side the Ka-50 perfectly. Plus its a symbol that everyone recognizes. It's a big, intimidating, mean slick that would make people soil themselves and wreck when I would come flying down the highway at full speed. Plus I could carry a large troop of pornstars / models in the back ;D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] EtherealN: I will promptly perform a sex change and offer my hand in marriage to whomever
Vault Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 Because it has a galley, bed & toilet ? Those commodities are a bonus Weta... but TBH I'd pick the Su-34 purely for aesthetic reasons. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
zakobi Posted August 7, 2009 Author Posted August 7, 2009 Those commodities are a bonus Weta... but TBH I'd pick the Su-34 purely for aesthetic reasons. Dunno were i found it it, but someone said somethilg like this: Name: Su-34 (export nam: Su-32, Nato name: Fullback) WTF??? "export name: Su-32" :megalol: 1. It's Su-32FN 2. There's no export version (AFAIK) 3. Su-32FN is the naval version... How many other aircrafts have a rear viewing radar? :D
Shaman Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 Tough choice... no one EF-111F so far:) 51PVO Founding member (DEC2007-) 100KIAP Founding member (DEC2018-) :: Shaman aka [100☭] Shamansky tail# 44 or 444 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 100KIAP Regiment Early Warning & Control officer
zakobi Posted August 27, 2009 Author Posted August 27, 2009 Hmm, seems the SU-34 also got massage installed in the seat...
jerom1992 Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Gripen because i could land on highways in style :) Imagine asking a fuel tank operator: "3000 litres of kerosine please!":megalol:
joey45 Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 (edited) I might go for a latter model of the Spitfire with the Griphen engine. EDIT: on second thoughts.. I want this plane. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJo5TQMOuSE Edited August 27, 2009 by joey45 The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
jerom1992 Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 on second thoughts.. I want this plane. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJo5TQMOuSE If Fictional planes are possible: Firefox http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_wKcDLSTPE
mvsgas Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 I might go for a latter model of the Spitfire with the Griphen engine. EDIT: on second thoughts.. I want this plane. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJo5TQMOuSE I think you can build it at home http://www.bd-micro.com/FLS5J.HTM#KIT%20FEATURES http://video.yahoo.com/watch/2715044/7911414 To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
zakobi Posted August 27, 2009 Author Posted August 27, 2009 I might go for a latter model of the Spitfire with the Griphen engine. EDIT: on second thoughts.. I want this plane. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJo5TQMOuSE Damn, i want a missile like, just look at how much fuel it seems to have... And the explosion! :D
topol-m Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 (edited) I think you can build it at home http://www.bd-micro.com/FLS5J.HTM#KIT%20FEATURES http://video.yahoo.com/watch/2715044/7911414 OMG never knew such small ameteur jets existed. :) It would be great fun to fly this thing much more than one with a propeller IMHO. Any idea how much would cost to have this baby? Edited August 27, 2009 by topol-m [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
wildcat EAF51 Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Harrier because I can park everywhere LMAO! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I'm Fighter pilot not a murderer!
zakobi Posted August 27, 2009 Author Posted August 27, 2009 (edited) Harrier because I can park everywhere LMAO! A CV-22 can carry more :thumbup: Edited August 27, 2009 by zakobi
Recommended Posts