Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I tried to drop some LS-6-100s because there's a jtac in the area so it is safer for me, I get the tone, drop it, and one second later, my wing blows up. Tested twice. I was going about mach 0.94, idk why it decides to blow up my wing but I wish it wouldn't.

Posted
On 6/22/2025 at 1:47 PM, Mavkruger said:

the problem exist for 1 year, it depend on the speed and the range, but it's ED work...

yes, we've reported this to ED's bug track system for a while, still wait for a response from ED

@BIGNEWY 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

My DCS Mods, Skins, Utilities and Scripts

 

| Windows 10 | i7-4790K | GTX 980Ti Hybrid | 32GB RAM | 3TB SSD |

| TM Warthog Stick | CH Pro Throttle + Pro Pedal | TIR5 Pro | TM MFD Cougar | Gun Camera: PrtScn |

Posted
On 6/21/2025 at 7:16 PM, Napillo said:

I tried to drop some LS-6-100s because there's a jtac in the area so it is safer for me, I get the tone, drop it, and one second later, my wing blows up. Tested twice. I was going about mach 0.94, idk why it decides to blow up my wing but I wish it wouldn't.

the work arround untill ED has free time is try to launch it on high alt (25-30k) and with a little nose up

Posted

i do the same thing, but maybe ED need to let Deka debug weapon. They know their weapon since they are the ones who made it in the first place and they are also the ones who suffer from the bugs.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/25/2025 at 9:03 AM, uboats said:

yes, we've reported this to ED's bug track system for a while, still wait for a response from ED

@BIGNEWY 

Why is it not possible for Deka to take back control of their weapons?

Mainly things specific to the JF17, BRM, SD10, 802, etc. 

I don't understand why this method is being used, They are all weapons designed by Deka and should remain in their care. 

@BIGNEWY

  • Like 2
Posted
On 7/19/2025 at 9:58 AM, Creampie said:

Why is it not possible for Deka to take back control of their weapons?

Mainly things specific to the JF17, BRM, SD10, 802, etc. 

I don't understand why this method is being used, They are all weapons designed by Deka and should remain in their care. 

@BIGNEWY

This issue was reported over a year ago, and unfortunately, it still hasn't been addressed.

I agree with your point, no disrespect to ED, but if the development team is so overwhelmed that a critical weapon bug rendering it unusable remains unresolved for this long, perhaps it's time to consider delegating weapon development to the respective third-party developers. This could help reduce the burden on ED's internal team and ensure more timely fixes.

again, it's been a year, and we have no clue when it'll be fixed

  • Like 2
Posted
8 hours ago, hamza_Khan said:

This issue was reported over a year ago, and unfortunately, it still hasn't been addressed.

I agree with your point, no disrespect to ED, but if the development team is so overwhelmed that a critical weapon bug rendering it unusable remains unresolved for this long, perhaps it's time to consider delegating weapon development to the respective third-party developers. This could help reduce the burden on ED's internal team and ensure more timely fixes.

again, it's been a year, and we have no clue when it'll be fixed

 

Yeah it 100% doesn't make sense to leave things probably easily fixed by the developer broken for such a long period of time. This goes for many of the Jeff weapons unfortunately, 802 still bonked sometimes, ls6100s, LD10 supposed to be getting its explosive mass slightly increased... Respectfully ED just can't handle the work load & like you said leave it to the devs, If their concern is approval. surely it is easier to do an approval process to help keep code or whatever uniform, thats fine. 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Creampie said:

Yeah it 100% doesn't make sense to leave things probably easily fixed by the developer broken for such a long period of time.

Not relevant to the bug itself, this should probably be moved to discussions.

From what I've seen ED do, it's mainly to keep "balance". Like increasing the air friction on the LD-10 so it performs worse than a harm, same with the SD-10. Or they increase the RCS so that an LD-10 or SDB can actually be seen by a SAM even though they probably couldn't see them, etc.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...